A Hybrid Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Model for Evaluating Companies' Green Credit Rating

被引:22
作者
Yang, Chia-Chen [1 ]
Ou, Shang-Ling [2 ]
Hsu, Li-Chang [1 ]
机构
[1] Ling Tung Univ, Dept Finance, Taichung 40852, Taiwan
[2] Natl Chung Hsing Univ, Dept Agron, Taichung 40227, Taiwan
关键词
green credit rating; hybrid MCDM model; GRA; DEMATEL; ANP; TOPSIS; FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE; MCDM APPROACH; ENVIRONMENTAL DISCLOSURE; COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE; RELATIONAL ANALYSIS; CRITERIA; EXPENDITURES; SELECTION; TOPSIS;
D O I
10.3390/su11061506
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Along with economic development and social progress, environmental issues are increasingly becoming the subject of public concern. Through green credit, banks intentionally direct money into resource-conserving technology development and environmental protection industries, thus, encouraging enterprises to focus on green products. Therefore, establishing a reasonable green credit evaluation mechanism for banks is an important issue. Based on this, this study combines grey relational analysis (GRA), the Decision-Making Trial and Evaluation Laboratory technique (DEMATEL), analytic network process (ANP) and the Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) to develop a hybrid multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) model for quantifying data and, thereby, to establish a green credit rating mechanism. In order to verify the model, this study combines credit risk and economic, environmental and social performance evaluation criteria as green credit evaluation criteria. There are 55 high-tech listed companies in Taiwan in 2014 taken as the evaluation objects and conducted for a performance ranking. The empirical results can serve as a reference for financial authorities promoting green finance policies and for investors making investment decisions.
引用
收藏
页数:23
相关论文
共 69 条
[1]   Corporate environmental disclosure, financial markets and the media: An international perspective [J].
Aerts, Walter ;
Cormier, Denis ;
Magnan, Michel .
ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2008, 64 (03) :643-659
[2]  
Alam-tabriz A, 2014, Glob J Manag Stud Res, V1, P85
[3]  
Alimardani Maryam, 2014, International Journal of Services and Operations Management, V18, P179, DOI 10.1504/IJSOM.2014.062000
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2013, INFORM SCI, DOI DOI 10.1016/j.ins.2011.09.012
[5]  
Aruldoss M., 2013, American Journal of Information Systems, V1, P31, DOI [DOI 10.12691/AJIS-1-1-5, 10.12691/ajis-1-1-5]
[6]  
Balaji S., 2018, INT J APPL ENG RES, V13, P5216
[7]   Development of a fuzzy decision support framework for complex multi-attribute decision problems: A case study for the selection of skilful basketball players [J].
Balli, Serkan ;
Korukoglu, Serdar .
EXPERT SYSTEMS, 2014, 31 (01) :56-69
[8]   Evaluation of E-Learning Web Sites Using Fuzzy Axiomatic Design Based Approach [J].
Bueyuekoezkan, Guelcin ;
Arsenyan, Jbid ;
Ertek, Guerdal .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL INTELLIGENCE SYSTEMS, 2010, 3 (01) :28-42
[9]  
Bulgurcu B., 2013, INT J EC FINANC, V3, P844
[10]   A novel hybrid MCDM approach based on fuzzy DEMATEL, fuzzy ANP and fuzzy TOPSIS to evaluate green suppliers [J].
Buyukozkan, Gulcin ;
Cifci, Gizem .
EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2012, 39 (03) :3000-3011