Can Magnetic Resonance-Ultrasound Fusion Biopsy Improve Cancer Detection in Enlarged Prostates?

被引:63
作者
Diaz, Annerleim Walton [1 ]
Hoang, Anthony N. [1 ]
Turkbey, Baris [2 ]
Hong, Cheng William [3 ]
Hong Truong [1 ]
Sterling, Todd [1 ]
Rais-Bahrami, Soroush [1 ]
Siddiqui, M. Minhaj [1 ]
Stamatakis, Lambros [1 ]
Vourganti, Srinivas [1 ]
Nix, Jeffrey [1 ]
Logan, Jennifer [1 ]
Harris, Colette [1 ]
Weintraub, Michael [1 ]
Chua, Celene [1 ]
Merino, Maria J. [4 ]
Choyke, Peter [2 ]
Wood, Bradford J. [3 ]
Pinto, Peter A. [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] NCI, Urol Oncol Branch, NIH, Bethesda, MD 20892 USA
[2] NCI, Mol Imaging Program, NIH, Bethesda, MD 20892 USA
[3] NCI, Ctr Intervent Oncol, NIH, Bethesda, MD 20892 USA
[4] NCI, Pathol Lab, NIH, Bethesda, MD 20892 USA
关键词
prostate; prostatic neoplasms; prostatic hyperplasia; magnetic resonance imaging; ultrasonography; NEEDLE-BIOPSY; GLAND VOLUME; MRI; POPULATION; EXPERIENCE; GUIDANCE; SYSTEM;
D O I
10.1016/j.juro.2013.05.118
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Purpose: Patients with an enlarged prostate and suspicion of prostate cancer pose a diagnostic dilemma. The prostate cancer detection rate of systematic 12-core transrectal ultrasound guided biopsy is between 30% and 40%. For prostates greater than 40 cc this decreases to 30% or less. Magnetic resonance-ultrasound fusion biopsy has shown superior prostate cancer detection rates. We defined the detection rate of magnetic resonance-ultrasound fusion biopsy in men with an enlarged prostate gland. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the records of patients who underwent multiparametric prostate magnetic resonance imaging followed by magnetic resonance-ultrasound fusion biopsy at our institution. Whole prostate volumes were calculated using magnetic resonance imaging reconstructions. Detection rates were analyzed with respect to age, prostate specific antigen and whole prostate volumes. Multivariable logistic regression was used to assess these parameters as independent predictors of prostate cancer detection. Results: We analyzed 649 patients with a mean +/- SD age of 61.8 +/- 7.9 years and a median prostate specific antigen of 6.65 ng/ml (IQR 4.35-11.0). Mean whole prostate volume was 58.7 +/- 34.3 cc. The overall detection rate of the magnetic resonance-ultrasound fusion platform was 55%. For prostates less than 40 cc the detection rate was 71.1% compared to 57.5%, 46.9%, 46.9% 33.3%, 36.4% and 30.4% for glands 40 to 54.9, 55 to 69.9, 70 to 84.9, 85 to 99.9, 100 to 114.9 and 115 cc or greater, respectively (p < 0.0001). Multivariable logistic regression showed a significant inverse association of magnetic resonance imaging volume with prostate cancer detection, controlling for age and prostate specific antigen. Conclusions: Transrectal ultrasound guided and fusion biopsy cancer detection rates decreased with increasing prostate volume. However, magnetic resonance-ultrasound fusion biopsy had a higher prostate cancer detection rate compared to that of transrectal ultrasound guided biopsy in the literature. Magnetic resonance-ultrasound fusion biopsy represents a promising solution for patients with suspicion of prostate cancer and an enlarged prostate.
引用
收藏
页码:2020 / 2025
页数:6
相关论文
共 29 条
  • [1] Use of extended systematic sampling in patients with a prior negative prostate needle biopsy
    Chon, CH
    Lai, FC
    McNeal, JE
    Presti, JC
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2002, 167 (06) : 2457 - 2460
  • [2] Prospective evaluation of a 21-sample needle biopsy procedure designed to improve the prostate cancer detection rate
    de la Taille, A
    Antiphon, P
    Salomon, L
    Cherfan, M
    Porcher, R
    Hoznek, A
    Saint, F
    Vordos, D
    Cicco, A
    Yiou, R
    Zafrani, ES
    Chopin, D
    Abbou, CC
    [J]. UROLOGY, 2003, 61 (06) : 1181 - 1186
  • [3] Magnetic Resonance Imaging for the Detection, Localisation, and Characterisation of Prostate Cancer: Recommendations from a European Consensus Meeting
    Dickinson, Louise
    Ahmed, Hashim U.
    Allen, Clare
    Barentsz, Jelle O.
    Carey, Brendan
    Futterer, Jurgen J.
    Heijmink, Stijn W.
    Hoskin, Peter J.
    Kirkham, Alex
    Padhani, Anwar R.
    Persad, Raj
    Puech, Philippe
    Punwani, Shonit
    Sohaib, Aslam S.
    Tombal, Bertrand
    Villers, Arnauld
    van der Meulen, Jan
    Emberton, Mark
    [J]. EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2011, 59 (04) : 477 - 494
  • [4] Diagnostic value of systematic biopsy methods in the investigation of prostate cancer: A systematic review
    Eichler, K
    Hempel, S
    Wilby, J
    Myers, L
    Bachmann, LM
    Kleijnen, J
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2006, 175 (05) : 1605 - 1612
  • [5] A Novel Stereotactic Prostate Biopsy System Integrating Pre-Interventional Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Live Ultrasound Fusion
    Hadaschik, Boris A.
    Kuru, Timur H.
    Tulea, Corina
    Rieker, Philip
    Popeneciu, Ionel V.
    Simpfendoerfer, Tobias
    Huber, Johannes
    Zogal, Pawel
    Teber, Dogu
    Pahernik, Sascha
    Roethke, Matthias
    Zamecnik, Patrik
    Roth, Wilfried
    Sakas, Georgios
    Schlemmer, Heinz-Peter
    Hohenfellner, Markus
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2011, 186 (06) : 2214 - 2220
  • [6] The clinical management of patients with a small volume of prostatic cancer on biopsy: What are the risks of progression?
    Harnden, Patricia
    Naylor, Brian
    Shelley, Michael D.
    Clements, Hayley
    Coles, Bernadette
    Mason, Malcolm D.
    [J]. CANCER, 2008, 112 (05) : 971 - 981
  • [7] EAU Guidelines on Prostate Cancer. Part 1: Screening, Diagnosis, and Treatment of Clinically Localised Disease
    Heidenreich, Axel
    Bellmunt, Joaquim
    Bolla, Michel
    Joniau, Steven
    Mason, Malcolm
    Matveev, Vsevolod
    Mottet, Nicolas
    Schmid, Hans-Peter
    van der Kwast, Theo
    Wiegel, Thomas
    Zattoni, Filliberto
    [J]. EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2011, 59 (01) : 61 - 71
  • [8] Image guidance in the focal treatment of prostate cancer
    Hoang, Anthony N.
    Volkin, Dmitry
    Yerram, Nitin K.
    Vourganti, Srinivas
    Nix, Jeffrey
    Linehan, W. Marston
    Wood, Bradford
    Pinto, Peter A.
    [J]. CURRENT OPINION IN UROLOGY, 2012, 22 (04) : 328 - 335
  • [9] Hodge KK, 1989, J UROL, V142
  • [10] Multiparametric MRI for prostate cancer localization in correlation to whole-mount histopathology
    Isebaert, Sofie
    Van den Bergh, Laura
    Haustermans, Karin
    Joniau, Steven
    Lerut, Evelyne
    De Wever, Liesbeth
    De Keyzer, Frederik
    Budiharto, Tom
    Slagmolen, Pieter
    Van Poppel, Hendrik
    Oyen, Raymond
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2013, 37 (06) : 1392 - 1401