Optimum exposure ranges for computed dental radiography

被引:12
作者
Hayakawa, Y
Farman, AG
Scarfe, WC
Kuroyanagi, K
Rumack, PM
Schick, DB
机构
[1] Division of Radiology, School of Dentistry, The University of Louisville, Kentucky
[2] Department of Oral Radiology, Tokyo Dental College, Chiba
[3] Schick Technologies Inc., Long Island City, NY
[4] Division of Radiology, School of Dentistry, The University of Louisville, Louisville
关键词
radiography; dental; radiographic image enhancement; signal processing; computer-assisted;
D O I
10.1259/dmfr.25.2.9446976
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Objectives. Computed dental radiography (CDR; Schick Technologies Inc, Lond Island City, NY, USA) can be used with any dental X-ray generator. The optimum exposure at various tube voltage settings was studied. Methods. Images were made of a dental QA jaw phantom and a standard aluminium stepwedge. Exposures were made between 50 and 90 kVp at 10 kVp intervals. Two contrast indices were calculated from the bone stepwedge pixel values: CI(1), the ratio between the highest and lowest pixel values, and CI(2), the difference between them. Results. Contrast indices were greatest at low kVp. The gradual decrease in CI(1) with increased exposure demonstrated that the optimum exposure range was always relatively wide. Maximum CI(2) values were found at exposures of 27, 17, 15, 11 and 9 mu C kg(-1) at 50, 60, 70, 80 and 90 kVp, respectively, at the centre of the optimum exposure range. Pixel values for each aluminium step increased both with increased exposure and with increased kVp. The longest contrast scale was obtained at 11.0, 9.6, 8.7, 7.2 and 7.0 mu C kg at 50, 60, 70, 80 and 90 kVp. The steepest slopes were obtained either with thin aluminium steps or at low kVp. Conclusions. CDR is a fast CCD-based system and is capable of operating at a wide range of kVp settings.
引用
收藏
页码:71 / 75
页数:5
相关论文
共 18 条
  • [1] EVALUATION OF THE NEW RADIOVISIOGRAPHY SYSTEM IMAGE QUALITY
    BENZ, C
    MOUYEN, F
    [J]. ORAL SURGERY ORAL MEDICINE ORAL PATHOLOGY ORAL RADIOLOGY AND ENDODONTICS, 1991, 72 (05): : 627 - 631
  • [2] Farman A G, 1995, Quintessence Int, V26, P399
  • [3] PIXEL PERCEPTION AND VOXEL VISION - CONSTRUCTS FOR A NEW PARADIGM IN MAXILLOFACIAL IMAGING
    FARMAN, AG
    SCARFE, WC
    [J]. DENTOMAXILLOFACIAL RADIOLOGY, 1994, 23 (01) : 5 - 9
  • [4] Grondahl H G, 1992, Dentomaxillofac Radiol, V21, P198
  • [5] SENS-A-RAY CHARACTERISTICS WITH VARIATIONS IN-BEAM QUALITY
    HARADA, T
    NISHIKAWA, K
    SHIBUYA, H
    HAYAKAWA, Y
    KUROYANAGI, K
    [J]. ORAL SURGERY ORAL MEDICINE ORAL PATHOLOGY ORAL RADIOLOGY AND ENDODONTICS, 1995, 80 (01): : 120 - 123
  • [6] HAYAKAWA Y, 1995, ORAL RADIOL, V11, P31
  • [7] Kapa S F, 1990, Dentomaxillofac Radiol, V19, P67
  • [8] KUROYANAGI K, 1994, J JPN DENT ASS, V47, P129
  • [9] AN EVALUATION OF THE SENS-A-RAY DIGITAL DENTAL IMAGING-SYSTEM
    MCDONNELL, D
    PRICE, C
    [J]. DENTOMAXILLOFACIAL RADIOLOGY, 1993, 22 (03) : 121 - 126
  • [10] DIRECT DIGITAL DENTAL-X-RAY IMAGING WITH VISUALIX/VIXA
    MOLTENI, R
    [J]. ORAL SURGERY ORAL MEDICINE ORAL PATHOLOGY ORAL RADIOLOGY AND ENDODONTICS, 1993, 76 (02): : 235 - 243