Phylogenetic diversity reveals hidden patterns related to population source and species pools during restoration

被引:19
作者
Khalil, Mohammed I. [1 ]
Gibson, David J.
Baer, Sara G.
机构
[1] Southern Illinois Univ, Dept Plant Biol, 1263 Lincoln Dr, Carbondale, IL 62901 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
community assembly; cultivars; dominant species; ecotypes; phylogenetic diversity; phylogeny; prairie; restoration; seed sources; stability; COMMUNITY ASSEMBLY MECHANISMS; GENETIC DIFFERENTIATION; INTRASPECIFIC VARIATION; COMPETITIVE-EXCLUSION; FUNCTIONAL DIVERSITY; GENOTYPIC DIVERSITY; LIMITING SIMILARITY; DOMINANT GRASSES; SEED SOURCE; PLANT;
D O I
10.1111/1365-2664.12743
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
A phylogenetic perspective of community assembly can reveal new insights into how variation within dominant species interacts with the local species pool to influence the structure of restored plant communities. Many studies have examined the effect of dominant species in structuring plant communities, but few have investigated their effect on phylogenetic diversity (PD). We established grassland in a post-agricultural field using two population sources (cultivars and local ecotypes) of three dominant grasses (Sorghastrum nutans, Andropogon gerardii and Schizachyrium scoparium) with three unique pools of subordinate species that varied in PD but not taxonomic or life-form diversity. We tested the effect of the population source treatment on two metrics of community PD (net relatedness index [NRI] and nearest taxon index [NTI]) during the first 4years of restoration. The NRI measures the overall pairwise phylogenetic distance between all pairs of taxa in a community. By contrast, NTI measures the pairwise distance between closely related taxa in a community. Population sources had a transitory effect on community phylogenetic structure over time. Local ecotypes decreased the abundance of closely related eudicots, monocots (low +NRI and +NTI values) and volunteer species (-NTI) more than cultivars. However, population sources did not affect ecologically conservative species (i.e. species with intermediate-to-poor ecological tolerance and a high degree of fidelity to prairie habitats). Thus, cultivars might have a positive effect on community phylogenetic diversity more than local ecotypes by decreasing the abundance of a phylogenetically diverse community of less closely related volunteer species. Differences in PD of seed mixes were maintained in the community of high-fidelity species, but did not affect PD of the unsown (volunteer) species in the assembling community.Synthesis and applications. This is the first experiment to show consequences of using different seed sources on phylogenetic diversity (PD) in grassland restoration. Phylogenetics can reveal the effects of population sources on the abundance of volunteer species not evident through traditional analyses of species diversity. The PD of seed mixes or establishing communities, or other assessments of phylogenetic relationships, by restoration practitioners is recommended as a metric to allow consequences of the evolutionary patterns among species to be included in conservation planning. Increased accessibility of phylogenetic tools will allow the application of PD in restoration monitoring.
引用
收藏
页码:91 / 101
页数:11
相关论文
共 101 条
  • [31] Diboll N., 2005, The tallgrass restoration handbook, P135
  • [32] Contrasting lineage-specific patterns conceal community phylogenetic structure in larger clades
    Elliott, Tammy L.
    Waterway, Marcia J.
    Davies, T. Jonathan
    [J]. JOURNAL OF VEGETATION SCIENCE, 2016, 27 (01) : 69 - 79
  • [33] Falk Donald A., 2006, P14
  • [34] Phylogenetic community structure when competition and environmental filtering determine abundances
    Freilich, Mara A.
    Connolly, Sean R.
    [J]. GLOBAL ECOLOGY AND BIOGEOGRAPHY, 2015, 24 (12): : 1390 - 1400
  • [35] Seed source impacts germination and early establishment of dominant grasses in prairie restorations
    Gallagher, M. Kate
    Wagenius, Stuart
    [J]. JOURNAL OF APPLIED ECOLOGY, 2016, 53 (01) : 251 - 263
  • [36] Phylogenetic patterns are not proxies of community assembly mechanisms (they are far better)
    Gerhold, Pille
    Cahill, James F., Jr.
    Winter, Marten
    Bartish, Igor V.
    Prinzing, Andreas
    [J]. FUNCTIONAL ECOLOGY, 2015, 29 (05) : 600 - 614
  • [37] Intraspecific variation among clones of a naive rare grass affects competition with a nonnative, invasive forb
    Gibson, David J.
    Dewey, Justin
    Goossens, Helene
    Dodd, Misty M.
    [J]. ECOLOGY AND EVOLUTION, 2014, 4 (02): : 186 - 199
  • [38] Limited effects of dominant species population source on community composition during community assembly
    Gibson, David J.
    Baer, Sara G.
    Klopf, Ryan P.
    Reed, Lewis K.
    Wodika, Ben R.
    Willand, Jason E.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF VEGETATION SCIENCE, 2013, 24 (03) : 429 - 440
  • [39] Effects of foundation species genotypic diversity on subordinate species richness in an assembling community
    Gibson, David J.
    Allstadt, Andrew J.
    Baer, Sara G.
    Geisler, Matt
    [J]. OIKOS, 2012, 121 (04) : 496 - 507
  • [40] Ecological assembly rules in plant communities-approaches, patterns and prospects
    Gotzenberger, Lars
    de Bello, Francesco
    Brathen, Kari Anne
    Davison, John
    Dubuis, Anne
    Guisan, Antoine
    Leps, Jan
    Lindborg, Regina
    Moora, Mari
    Partel, Meelis
    Pellissier, Loic
    Pottier, Julien
    Vittoz, Pascal
    Zobel, Kristjan
    Zobel, Martin
    [J]. BIOLOGICAL REVIEWS, 2012, 87 (01) : 111 - 127