Bilateral Ultrasound-guided Erector Spinae Plane Block for Postoperative Analgesia in Lumbar Spine Surgery: A Randomized Control Trial

被引:139
作者
Singh, Swati [1 ,2 ]
Choudhary, Neeraj K. [2 ,3 ]
Lalin, Dusu [2 ]
Verma, Vinod K. [2 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Postgrad Inst Med Educ & Res, Dept Anaesthesia & Crit Care, Chandigarh, Punjab, India
[2] Indira Gandhi Inst Med Sci, Patna, Bihar, India
[3] Patna Med Coll & Hosp, Dept Anaesthesia & Crit Care, Patna, Bihar, India
[4] Rajendra Inst Med Sci, Dept Anaesthesia, Ranchi, Jharkhand, India
关键词
lumbar spine surgery; postoperative analgesia; nerve block; PAIN; MANAGEMENT; THORACOTOMY; EFFICACY; FUSION;
D O I
10.1097/ANA.0000000000000603
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Background: Major lumbar spine surgery causes severe postoperative pain. The primary objective of this randomized controlled study was to compare the effect of ultrasound (US)-guided erector spinae plane (ESP) block on 24-hour postoperative cumulative opioid requirements with standard (opioid-based) analgesia. Postoperative pain control and patient satisfaction were also assessed. Materials and Methods: Adults scheduled for elective lumbar spine surgery under general anesthesia were randomly assigned to the following (and they are): Control group-no preoperative ESP block, or ESP block group-preoperative bilateral US-guided ESP block. Both groups received standard general anesthesia during surgery. Postoperative pain score, number of patients requiring rescue analgesia, and total morphine consumption during the first 24 postoperative hours were recorded. Patient satisfaction was assessed 24 hours after surgery. Results: Postoperative morphine consumption was significantly lower in patients in the ESP group compared with those in the control group (1.4 +/- 1.5 vs. 7.2 +/- 2.0 mg, respectively;P<0.001). All patients in the control group required supplemental morphine compared with only 9 (45%) in the ESP block group (P=0.002). Pain scores immediately after surgery (P=0.002) and at 6 hours after surgery (P=0.040) were lower in the ESP block group compared with the control group. Patient satisfaction scores were more favorable in the block group (P<0.0001). Conclusions: US-guided ESP block reduces postoperative opioid requirement and improves patient satisfaction compared with standard analgesia in lumbar spine surgery patients.
引用
收藏
页码:330 / 334
页数:5
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]   The pharmacokinetics and efficacy of ropivacaine continuous wound instillation after spine fusion surgery [J].
Bianconi, M ;
Ferraro, L ;
Ricci, R ;
Zanoli, G ;
Antonelli, T ;
Giulia, B ;
Guberti, A ;
Massari, L .
ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2004, 98 (01) :166-172
[2]   Erector spinae plane block in abdominal surgery: Case series [J].
Carlos Luis-Navarro, Juan ;
Seda-Guzman, Maria ;
Luis-Moreno, Cristina ;
Chin, Ki-Jinn .
INDIAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2018, 62 (07) :549-554
[3]   The right plane for drug injection in ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block [J].
Chaudhary, Neeeraj Kumar ;
Singh, Swati .
INDIAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2018, 62 (05) :405-405
[4]   The analgesic efficacy of pre-operative bilateral erector spinae plane (ESP) blocks in patients having ventral hernia repair [J].
Chin, K. J. ;
Adhikary, S. ;
Sarwani, N. ;
Forero, M. .
ANAESTHESIA, 2017, 72 (04) :452-460
[5]   The Erector Spinae Plane Block Provides Visceral Abdominal Analgesia in Bariatric Surgery A Report of 3 Cases [J].
Chin, Ki Jinn ;
Malhas, Laith ;
Perlas, Anahi .
REGIONAL ANESTHESIA AND PAIN MEDICINE, 2017, 42 (03) :372-376
[6]   Postoperative pain control after lumbar spine fusion - Patient-controlled analgesia versus continuous epidural analgesia [J].
Cohen, BE ;
Hartman, MB ;
Wade, JT ;
Miller, JS ;
Gilbert, R ;
Chapman, TM .
SPINE, 1997, 22 (16) :1892-1896
[7]   Erector spinae plane block as an alternative to epidural analgesia for post-operative analgesia following video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery: A case study and a literature review on the spread of local anaesthetic in the erector spinae plane [J].
Das Adhikary, Sanjib ;
Pruett, Ashlee ;
Forero, Mauricio ;
Thiruvenkatarajan, Venkatesan .
INDIAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2018, 62 (01) :75-78
[8]  
Forero M, 2017, A A CASE REP, V8, P254, DOI 10.1213/XAA.0000000000000478
[9]  
Forero M, 2018, CAN J ANESTH, V65, P288, DOI 10.1007/s12630-017-1010-1
[10]  
Forero M, 2017, SCAND J PAIN, V17, P325, DOI 10.1016/j.sjpain.2017.08.013