Robot Assisted Radical Prostatectomy in Kidney Transplant Recipients. Our Clinical Experience and a Systematic Review

被引:15
|
作者
Moreno Sierra, Jesus [1 ]
Ciappara Paniagua, M. [1 ]
Galante Romo, M. I. [1 ]
Senovilla Perez, J. L. [1 ]
Redondo Gonzalez, E. [1 ]
Galindo Herrero, M. I. [1 ]
Novo Gomez, N. [1 ]
Blazquez Izquierdo, J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Complutense, Hosp Clin San Carlos, Inst Invest Sanitaria, Serv Urol, ES-28760 Madrid, Spain
关键词
Kidney transplantation; Prostatectomy; Prostatic adenocarcinoma; Prostatic carcinoma; Radical prostatectomy; Robotic prostatectomy; Robot assisted radical prostatectomy; RENAL-TRANSPLANTATION; CANCER; RADIOTHERAPY; MULTICENTER;
D O I
10.1159/000446323
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction: Radical prostatectomy is a more skillful procedure in kidney graft recipients. Robotic surgery can provide a useful minimally invasive tool. Objectives: The study aims to evaluate the robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy (RALP) in kidney transplant recipients, describing intra/postoperative complications, renal and oncological outcomes. Methods: This is a retrospective study conducted in a single institution of 84 RALP. Four of them were kidney transplant recipients. Side of the renal graft, clinical stage, intra/postoperative events, operating time, creatinine levels before/after intervention and oncologic follow-up were recorded. A systematic review of the literature was performed. Results: Aged 61.25 +/- 7.76 years, interval between renal transplantation and RALP: 10 +/- 3.16 years. Mean prostate specific antigen: 7.1 +/- 2.8 ng/ml, 2 patients were cT1c and 2 cT2a. Preoperative biopsies: Gleason score 3 + 3 in 3 patients, 3 + 4 in 1 patient. Charlson comorbidity index mean was 4.82 +/- 0.82. No intra/postoperative events were reported. Mean operating time: 196 +/- 20.8 min. Positive surgical margins: 2/4 patients. Pathological analysis: Gleason 3 + 4 in 2 patients and Gleason 3 + 3 in the others 2. A patient developed a bladder neck sclerosis. No differences between pre/postoperative creatinine. Three patients are free of biochemical recurrence and 1 patient required adjuvant radiotherapy. Conclusion: RALP in renal transplant recipients is a safe and feasible technique for localized prostate cancer. No difference in oncological outcomes and no impairments on renal function were found. (C) 2016 S. Karger AG, Basel
引用
收藏
页码:440 / 444
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Transperitoneal Versus Extraperitoneal Approach for Laparoscopic and Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Purnomo, Stefanus
    Hamid, Agus Rizal Ardy Hariandy
    Siregar, Moammar Andar Roemare
    Afriansyah, Andika
    Mirza, Hendy
    Seno, Doddy Hami
    Purnomo, Nugroho
    UROLOGY RESEARCH AND PRACTICE, 2023, 49 (05) : 285 - 292
  • [42] Adherence to the immunosuppressive regimen in pediatric kidney transplant recipients: A systematic review
    Dobbels, F.
    Ruppar, T.
    De Geest, S.
    Decorte, A.
    Van Damme-Lombaerts, R.
    Fine, R. N.
    PEDIATRIC TRANSPLANTATION, 2010, 14 (05) : 603 - 613
  • [43] Outbreaks and clustering of Pneumocystis pneumonia in kidney transplant recipients: a systematic review
    de Boer, Mark G. J.
    de Fijter, Johannes W.
    Kroon, Frank P.
    MEDICAL MYCOLOGY, 2011, 49 (07) : 673 - 680
  • [44] Economic evaluations of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy and the factors affecting its cost-effectiveness: a systematic review
    Lei, Qing-qiang
    Li, Hai-nan
    Zhao, Jin
    Li, Jing-yi
    Dai, Yu-di
    Hu, Min
    JOURNAL OF ROBOTIC SURGERY, 2024, 18 (01)
  • [45] Fracture Risk in Kidney Transplant Recipients: A Systematic Review
    Naylor, Kyla L.
    Li, Alvin H.
    Lam, Ngan N.
    Hodsman, Anthony B.
    Jamal, Sophie A.
    Garg, Amit X.
    TRANSPLANTATION, 2013, 95 (12) : 1461 - 1470
  • [46] Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy vs. Open Retropubic Radical Prostatectomy for Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Pan, Xiu-wu
    Cui, Xin-ming
    Teng, Jing-fei
    Zhang, Dong-xu
    Wang, Zhi-jun
    Qu, Fa-jun
    Gao, Yi
    Cui, Xin-gang
    Xu, Dan-feng
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2015, 77 : S1326 - S1333
  • [47] Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy vs. Open Retropubic Radical Prostatectomy for Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Xiu-wu Pan
    Xin-ming Cui
    Jing-fei Teng
    Dong-xu Zhang
    Zhi-jun Wang
    Fa-jun Qu
    Yi Gao
    Xin-gang Cui
    Dan-feng Xu
    Indian Journal of Surgery, 2015, 77 : 1326 - 1333
  • [48] Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy has lower biochemical recurrence than laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: Systematic review and meta-analysis
    Lee, Seon Heui
    Seo, Hyun Ju
    Lee, Na Rae
    Son, Soo Kyung
    Kim, Dae Keun
    Rha, Koon Ho
    INVESTIGATIVE AND CLINICAL UROLOGY, 2017, 58 (03) : 152 - 163
  • [49] Technical feasibility of robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy in renal transplant recipients: Results of a series of 12 consecutive cases
    Le Clerc, Quentin-Come
    Lecornet, Emilie
    Leon, Gregoire
    Rigaud, Jerome
    Glemain, Pascal
    Branchereau, Julien
    Karam, Georgess
    CUAJ-CANADIAN UROLOGICAL ASSOCIATION JOURNAL, 2015, 9 (7-8): : E490 - E493
  • [50] Elderly Patients' Outcomes After Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: A Single Center Experience
    Islamoglu, Ekrem
    Aksaray, Eren Erdi
    Tas, Selim
    Ari, Ozgur
    Boga, Mehmet Salih
    Ates, Mutlu
    Savas, Murat
    JOURNAL OF LAPAROENDOSCOPIC & ADVANCED SURGICAL TECHNIQUES, 2023, 33 (11): : 1097 - 1101