Robot Assisted Radical Prostatectomy in Kidney Transplant Recipients. Our Clinical Experience and a Systematic Review

被引:15
|
作者
Moreno Sierra, Jesus [1 ]
Ciappara Paniagua, M. [1 ]
Galante Romo, M. I. [1 ]
Senovilla Perez, J. L. [1 ]
Redondo Gonzalez, E. [1 ]
Galindo Herrero, M. I. [1 ]
Novo Gomez, N. [1 ]
Blazquez Izquierdo, J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Complutense, Hosp Clin San Carlos, Inst Invest Sanitaria, Serv Urol, ES-28760 Madrid, Spain
关键词
Kidney transplantation; Prostatectomy; Prostatic adenocarcinoma; Prostatic carcinoma; Radical prostatectomy; Robotic prostatectomy; Robot assisted radical prostatectomy; RENAL-TRANSPLANTATION; CANCER; RADIOTHERAPY; MULTICENTER;
D O I
10.1159/000446323
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction: Radical prostatectomy is a more skillful procedure in kidney graft recipients. Robotic surgery can provide a useful minimally invasive tool. Objectives: The study aims to evaluate the robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy (RALP) in kidney transplant recipients, describing intra/postoperative complications, renal and oncological outcomes. Methods: This is a retrospective study conducted in a single institution of 84 RALP. Four of them were kidney transplant recipients. Side of the renal graft, clinical stage, intra/postoperative events, operating time, creatinine levels before/after intervention and oncologic follow-up were recorded. A systematic review of the literature was performed. Results: Aged 61.25 +/- 7.76 years, interval between renal transplantation and RALP: 10 +/- 3.16 years. Mean prostate specific antigen: 7.1 +/- 2.8 ng/ml, 2 patients were cT1c and 2 cT2a. Preoperative biopsies: Gleason score 3 + 3 in 3 patients, 3 + 4 in 1 patient. Charlson comorbidity index mean was 4.82 +/- 0.82. No intra/postoperative events were reported. Mean operating time: 196 +/- 20.8 min. Positive surgical margins: 2/4 patients. Pathological analysis: Gleason 3 + 4 in 2 patients and Gleason 3 + 3 in the others 2. A patient developed a bladder neck sclerosis. No differences between pre/postoperative creatinine. Three patients are free of biochemical recurrence and 1 patient required adjuvant radiotherapy. Conclusion: RALP in renal transplant recipients is a safe and feasible technique for localized prostate cancer. No difference in oncological outcomes and no impairments on renal function were found. (C) 2016 S. Karger AG, Basel
引用
收藏
页码:440 / 444
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Robot-assisted versus open radical prostatectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective studies
    Wang, Junji
    Hu, Ke
    Wang, Yu
    Wu, Yinyu
    Bao, Erhao
    Wang, Jiahao
    Tan, Chunlin
    Tang, Tielong
    JOURNAL OF ROBOTIC SURGERY, 2023, 17 (06) : 2617 - 2631
  • [32] Comparison of oncological outcomes between retropubic radical prostatectomy and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: an analysis stratified by surgical experience
    Park, Jinsung
    Yoo, Dae-Seon
    Song, Cheryn
    Park, Sahyun
    Park, Sejun
    Kim, Seong Cheol
    Cho, Yongmee
    Ahn, Hanjong
    WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2014, 32 (01) : 193 - 199
  • [33] Can Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy Improve Functional Outcomes Compared to Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy? Experience at a Laparoscopic Center
    Lu, Cheng-Hsin
    Wu, Chun-Hsien
    Chen, Yu-Chi
    Chen, Chung-Hsien
    Wu, Richard Chen-Yu
    Lee, Yeh-Hsi
    Huang, Ching-Yu
    Yu, Tsan-Jung
    Lin, Victor C.
    UROLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2019, 30 (03) : 124 - 130
  • [34] Robot-assisted extraperitoneal laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: A review of the current literature
    Xylinas, Evanguelos
    Ploussard, Guillaume
    Durand, Xavier
    de la Taille, Alexandre
    UROLOGIC ONCOLOGY-SEMINARS AND ORIGINAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2013, 31 (03) : 288 - 293
  • [35] Initial Clinical Experience of Simultaneous Robot-Assisted Bilateral Partial Nephrectomy and Radical Prostatectomy
    Jung, Jae Hung
    Arkoncel, Francis Raymond P.
    Lee, Jae Won
    Oh, Cheol Kyu
    Yusoff, Noor Ashani Md
    Kim, Kwang Jin
    Rha, Koon Ho
    YONSEI MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2012, 53 (01) : 236 - 239
  • [36] Oncological and Postoperative Outcomes of Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy in Renal Transplant Recipients: A Multicenter and Comparative Study
    Leonard, Gregoire
    Pradere, Benjamin
    Monleon, Laure
    Boutin, Jean-Michel
    Branchereau, Julien
    Karam, Georges
    Rigaud, Jerome
    Bruyere, Franck
    TRANSPLANTATION PROCEEDINGS, 2020, 52 (03) : 850 - 856
  • [37] A review of technical progression in the robot-assisted radical prostatectomy
    Cho, Eric Y.
    Yang, Kevin K.
    Lee, Ziho
    Eun, Daniel D.
    TRANSLATIONAL ANDROLOGY AND UROLOGY, 2021, 10 (05) : 2171 - 2177
  • [38] Laparoscopic transperitoneal radical prostatectomy in renal transplant recipients: a review of the literature
    Alvarez Maestro, Mario
    Tabernero Gomez, Angel
    Alonso y Gregorio, Sergio
    Cisneros Ledo, Jesus
    de la Pena Barthel, Javier
    Martinez-Pineiro, Luis
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2010, 105 (06) : 844 - 848
  • [39] Extraperitoneal robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: Initial experience
    Dogra, Prem Nath
    Saini, Ashish Kumar
    Singh, Prabhjot
    Bora, Girdhar
    Nayak, Brusabhanu
    UROLOGY ANNALS, 2014, 6 (02) : 130 - 134
  • [40] Kidney stones in renal transplant recipients: A systematic review
    Piana, A.
    Basile, G.
    Masih, S.
    Bignante, G.
    Uleri, A.
    Gallioli, A.
    Prudhomme, T.
    Boissier, R.
    Pecoraro, A.
    Campi, R.
    Di Dio, M.
    Alba, S.
    Breda, A.
    Territo, A.
    ACTAS UROLOGICAS ESPANOLAS, 2024, 48 (01): : 79 - 104