Analysis of Quality Indicators for Colorectal Cancer Surgery in Units Accredited by the Spanish Association of Coloproctology

被引:10
|
作者
de la Portilla, Fernando [1 ]
Builes, Sergio [2 ]
Garcia-Novoa, Alejandra [3 ]
Espin, Eloy [4 ]
Kreisler, Esther [5 ]
Maria Enriquez-Navascues, Jose [6 ]
Biondo, Sebastiano [5 ]
Codina, Antonio [7 ]
机构
[1] Univ Seville, Hosp Univ Virgen del Rocio, Unidad Cirugia Colorrectal, CSIC,IBiS,Serv Cirugia Gen & Aparato Digest, Seville, Spain
[2] Hosp Juaneda Miramar, Serv Cirugia Gen & Aparato Digest, Palma de Mallorca, Spain
[3] Hosp Salnes, Serv Cirugia Gen & Aparato Digest, Villagarcia, Pontevedra, Spain
[4] Hosp Valle De Hebron, Serv Cirugia Gen & Aparato Digest, Unidad Coloproctol, Barcelona, Spain
[5] Hosp Bellvitge Princeps Espanya, Serv Cirugia Gen & Aparato Digest, Unidad Coloproctol, Barcelona, Spain
[6] Hosp Donostia, Serv Cirugia Gen & Aparato Digest, Unidad Coloproctol, San Sebastian, Spain
[7] Hosp Josep Trueta, Serv Cirugia Gen & Aparato Digest, Unidad Coloproctol, Girona, Spain
来源
CIRUGIA ESPANOLA | 2018年 / 96卷 / 04期
关键词
Colon neoplasms; Colon surgery; Quality indicators; Accreditation; OF-CARE INDICATORS; ANASTOMOTIC LEAKAGE; RISK-FACTORS; COLON-CANCER; RESECTION; MORTALITY; SOCIETY; AUDIT;
D O I
10.1016/j.ciresp.2018.02.008
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Introduction: Currently, there is growing interest in analyzing the results from surgical units and the implementation of quality standards in order to identify good healthcare practices. Due to this fact, the Spanish Association of Coloproctology (AECP) has developed a unit accreditation program that contemplates basic standards. The aim of this article is to evaluate and analyze the specific quality indicators for the surgical treatment of colorectal cancer, established by the program. Data were collected from colorectal units during the accreditation process. Methods: We analyzed prospectively collected data from elective colorectal surgeries at 18 Spanish coloproctology units during the period 2013-2017. Three main and four secondary quality indicators were considered. Colon and rectal surgeries were analyzed independently; furthermore, results were compared according to surgical approach. Results: A total of 3090 patients were included in the analysis. The global anastomotic leak rate was 7.8% (6.6% colon vs 10.6% rectum), while the surgical site infection rate was 12.6% (11.4% colon vs 14.8% rectum). Overall 30-day mortality was 2.3%, and anastomotic leak-related mortality was 10.2%. There were higher surgical site infection and mortality rates in the patients operated by open approach, however there was no difference in the anastomotic leak rate when compared with minimally invasive approaches. Conclusions: The evaluation of these results has determined optimal quality indices for the units accredited in the treatment of colorectal cancer. Furthermore, it allows us to establish realistic references in our country, thereby providing a better understanding and comparison of outcomes. (C) 2018 AEC. Published by Elsevier Espana, S.L.U. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:226 / 233
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Anastomotic leakage as an outcome measure for quality of colorectal cancer surgery
    Snijders, H. S.
    Henneman, D.
    van Leersum, N. L.
    ten Berge, M.
    Fiocco, M.
    Karsten, T. M.
    Havenga, K.
    Wiggers, T.
    Dekker, J. W.
    Tollenaar, R. A. E. M.
    Wouters, M. W. J. M.
    BMJ QUALITY & SAFETY, 2013, 22 (09) : 759 - 767
  • [22] A retrospective study examining the association between polypharmacy and complications after laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer
    Watanabe, Takashi
    Kashiwagura, Shota
    Ouchi, Ryusuke
    Usui, Kensuke
    Shibata, Chikashi
    Okada, Kouji
    JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL HEALTH CARE AND SCIENCES, 2024, 10 (01):
  • [23] QUALITY INDICATORS IN THORACIC SURGERY: THE IMPORTANCE OF PROCESS INDICATORS IN LUNG CANCER
    Darling, Gail E.
    Dickie, John
    Malthaner, Richard
    Mcknight, Leigh
    Sallay, Yasmin
    Hunter, Amber
    Li, Yingzi
    Mcleod, Robin
    JOURNAL OF THORACIC ONCOLOGY, 2013, 8 : S166 - S167
  • [24] Quality indicators for thyroid cancer surgery: current perspective
    Liu, Rachel Q.
    Wiseman, Sam M.
    EXPERT REVIEW OF ANTICANCER THERAPY, 2016, 16 (09) : 919 - 928
  • [25] Meta-analysis of the effect of laparoscopic surgery and open surgery on long-term quality of life in patients with colorectal cancer
    Cui, Mengfan
    Liu, Shimin
    MEDICINE, 2023, 102 (36) : E34922
  • [26] Analysis of mortality in colorectal surgery in the Bi-National Colorectal Cancer Audit
    Teloken, Patrick Ely
    Spilsbury, Katrina
    Platell, Cameron
    ANZ JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2016, 86 (06) : 454 - 458
  • [27] Evaluation of the Spanish Urological Association quality care indicators in a kidney transplantation programme
    Cienfuegos-Belmonte, I. R.
    Leon-Duenas, E.
    Roman-Martin, A. A.
    Olmo-Ruiz, M.
    Gonzalez-Roncero, F. M.
    Medina-Lopez, R. A.
    ACTAS UROLOGICAS ESPANOLAS, 2016, 40 (08): : 523 - 528
  • [28] Safety of elective colorectal cancer surgery: Non-surgical complications and colectomies are targets for quality improvement
    Henneman, Daniel
    Ten Berge, Martijn G.
    Snijders, Heleen S.
    Van Leersum, Nicoline J.
    Fiocco, Marta
    Wiggers, Theo
    Tollenaar, Rob A. E. M.
    Wouters, Michel W. J. M.
    JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2014, 109 (06) : 567 - 573
  • [29] A meta-analysis to determine the oncological implications of conversion in laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery
    Clancy, C.
    O'Leary, D. P.
    Burke, J. P.
    Redmond, H. P.
    Coffey, J. C.
    Kerin, M. J.
    Myers, E.
    COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2015, 17 (06) : 482 - 490
  • [30] Analysis of Recurrent Cases after Laparoscopic Surgery for Colorectal Cancer
    Matsuda, Takeru
    Fujita, Hirofumi
    Kunimoto, Yukihiro
    Kimura, Taisei
    Ogino, Kazunori
    HEPATO-GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2014, 61 (132) : 1028 - 1032