Analysis of Quality Indicators for Colorectal Cancer Surgery in Units Accredited by the Spanish Association of Coloproctology

被引:10
|
作者
de la Portilla, Fernando [1 ]
Builes, Sergio [2 ]
Garcia-Novoa, Alejandra [3 ]
Espin, Eloy [4 ]
Kreisler, Esther [5 ]
Maria Enriquez-Navascues, Jose [6 ]
Biondo, Sebastiano [5 ]
Codina, Antonio [7 ]
机构
[1] Univ Seville, Hosp Univ Virgen del Rocio, Unidad Cirugia Colorrectal, CSIC,IBiS,Serv Cirugia Gen & Aparato Digest, Seville, Spain
[2] Hosp Juaneda Miramar, Serv Cirugia Gen & Aparato Digest, Palma de Mallorca, Spain
[3] Hosp Salnes, Serv Cirugia Gen & Aparato Digest, Villagarcia, Pontevedra, Spain
[4] Hosp Valle De Hebron, Serv Cirugia Gen & Aparato Digest, Unidad Coloproctol, Barcelona, Spain
[5] Hosp Bellvitge Princeps Espanya, Serv Cirugia Gen & Aparato Digest, Unidad Coloproctol, Barcelona, Spain
[6] Hosp Donostia, Serv Cirugia Gen & Aparato Digest, Unidad Coloproctol, San Sebastian, Spain
[7] Hosp Josep Trueta, Serv Cirugia Gen & Aparato Digest, Unidad Coloproctol, Girona, Spain
来源
CIRUGIA ESPANOLA | 2018年 / 96卷 / 04期
关键词
Colon neoplasms; Colon surgery; Quality indicators; Accreditation; OF-CARE INDICATORS; ANASTOMOTIC LEAKAGE; RISK-FACTORS; COLON-CANCER; RESECTION; MORTALITY; SOCIETY; AUDIT;
D O I
10.1016/j.ciresp.2018.02.008
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Introduction: Currently, there is growing interest in analyzing the results from surgical units and the implementation of quality standards in order to identify good healthcare practices. Due to this fact, the Spanish Association of Coloproctology (AECP) has developed a unit accreditation program that contemplates basic standards. The aim of this article is to evaluate and analyze the specific quality indicators for the surgical treatment of colorectal cancer, established by the program. Data were collected from colorectal units during the accreditation process. Methods: We analyzed prospectively collected data from elective colorectal surgeries at 18 Spanish coloproctology units during the period 2013-2017. Three main and four secondary quality indicators were considered. Colon and rectal surgeries were analyzed independently; furthermore, results were compared according to surgical approach. Results: A total of 3090 patients were included in the analysis. The global anastomotic leak rate was 7.8% (6.6% colon vs 10.6% rectum), while the surgical site infection rate was 12.6% (11.4% colon vs 14.8% rectum). Overall 30-day mortality was 2.3%, and anastomotic leak-related mortality was 10.2%. There were higher surgical site infection and mortality rates in the patients operated by open approach, however there was no difference in the anastomotic leak rate when compared with minimally invasive approaches. Conclusions: The evaluation of these results has determined optimal quality indices for the units accredited in the treatment of colorectal cancer. Furthermore, it allows us to establish realistic references in our country, thereby providing a better understanding and comparison of outcomes. (C) 2018 AEC. Published by Elsevier Espana, S.L.U. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:226 / 233
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Quality indicators for colorectal cancer screening for colonoscopy
    Schoenfeld, Philip S.
    Cohen, Jonathan
    TECHNIQUES IN GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2013, 15 (02) : 59 - 68
  • [2] Improving Uniformity of Care for Colorectal Cancers Through National Quality Forum Quality Indicators at a Commission on Cancer-accredited Community Based Teaching Hospital
    Pappas, Dean P.
    Garbus, Jules E.
    Feuerman, Martin
    Reed, William P.
    SURGICAL ONCOLOGY CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2011, 20 (03) : 587 - +
  • [3] Quality indicators for colon cancer surgery. Evidence-based development of a set of indicators for the outcome quality
    Hardt, J.
    Buhr, H. -J.
    Klinger, C.
    Benz, S.
    Ludwig, K.
    Kalff, J.
    Post, S.
    CHIRURG, 2018, 89 (01): : 17 - 25
  • [4] Evaluating the Validity of Quality Indicators for Colorectal Cancer Care
    Gooiker, Gea A.
    Kolfschoten, Nikki E.
    Bastiaannet, Esther
    Van de Velde, Cornelis J. H.
    Eddes, Eric H.
    Van der Harst, Erwin
    Wiggers, Theo
    Rosendaal, Frits R.
    Tollenaar, Rob A. E. M.
    Wouters, Michel W. J. M.
    JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2013, 108 (07) : 465 - 471
  • [5] Outcomes following colorectal cancer surgery: Results from a population-based study in Queensland, Australia, using quality indicators
    Theile, David E.
    Philpot, Shoni
    Blake, Michael
    Harrington, John
    Youl, Philippa H.
    JOURNAL OF EVALUATION IN CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2019, 25 (05) : 834 - 842
  • [6] Assessing outcomes following surgery for colorectal cancer using quality of care indicators
    Vergara-Fernandez, Omar
    Swallow, Carol J.
    Victor, J. Charles
    O'Connor, Brenda I.
    Gryphe, Robert
    MacRae, Helen M.
    Zohen, Zane
    McLeod, Robin S.
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2010, 53 (04) : 232 - 240
  • [7] Measurement that matters: A systematic review and modified Delphi of multidisciplinary colorectal cancer quality indicators
    Donnelly, Candice
    Or, Michelle
    Toh, James
    Thevaraja, Mathushan
    Janssen, Anna
    Shaw, Tim
    Pathma-Nathan, Nimalan
    Harnett, Paul
    Chiew, Kim-Lin
    Vinod, Shalini
    Sundaresan, Puma
    ASIA-PACIFIC JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2024, 20 (02) : 259 - 274
  • [8] Quality assessment of surgery for colorectal cancer: Where do we stand?
    Morarasu, Stefan
    Livadaru, Cristian
    Dimofte, Gabriel-Mihail
    WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL SURGERY, 2024, 16 (04):
  • [9] Quality indicators in breast cancer surgery
    Donoso R, Ana Maria
    Amar C, Marcela
    Minassian M, Matias
    Salazar M, Claudio
    Arbulo L, Douglas
    Slater M, Jeannie
    Schwartz J, Ricardo
    Gomez S, Lionel
    Lee C, Kuen
    REVISTA CHILENA DE CIRUGIA, 2013, 65 (03): : 216 - 221
  • [10] Hazard function analysis for development of second primary colorectal cancer after surgery for primary colorectal cancer
    Kawai, Kazushige
    Nozawa, Hiroaki
    Sasaki, Kazuhito
    Murono, Koji
    Ishihara, Soichiro
    JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, 2022, 37 (01) : 56 - 62