Kinetics, prognostic and predictive values of ESR1 circulating mutations in metastatic breast cancer patients progressing on aromatase inhibitor

被引:76
|
作者
Clatot, Florian [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Perdrix, Anne [3 ,4 ]
Augusto, Laetitia [1 ]
Beaussire, Ludivine [3 ,5 ]
Delacour, Julien [3 ,5 ]
Calbrix, Celine [4 ]
Sefrioui, David [3 ,5 ,6 ]
Viailly, Pierre-Julien [2 ]
Bubenheim, Michael [7 ]
Moldovan, Cristian [1 ]
Alexandru, Cristina [1 ]
Tennevet, Isabelle [1 ]
Rigal, Olivier [1 ]
Guillemet, Cecile [1 ]
Leheurteur, Marianne [1 ]
Gouerant, Sophie [1 ]
Petrau, Camille [1 ,3 ]
Thery, Jean-Christophe [1 ]
Picquenot, Jean-Michel [1 ,2 ,4 ]
Veyret, Corinne [1 ]
Frebourg, Thierry [5 ]
Jardin, Fabrice [2 ]
Sarafan-Vasseur, Nasrin [3 ,5 ]
Di Fiore, Frederic [1 ,3 ,5 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Ctr Henri Becquerel, Dept Med Oncol, Rouen, France
[2] Ctr Henri Becquerel, INSERM U918, Rouen, France
[3] EquIpe Rech Oncol, Rouen, France
[4] Ctr Henri Becquerel, Dept Biopathol, Rouen, France
[5] Fac Med, INSERM U1079, Rouen, France
[6] Rouen Univ Hosp, Dept Gastroenterol, Rouen, France
[7] Rouen Univ Hosp, Dept Biostat, Rouen, France
关键词
ESR1; mutation; digital PCR; breast cancer; aromatase inhibitor; kinetics;
D O I
10.18632/oncotarget.12950
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: To assess the prognostic and predictive value of circulating ESR1 mutation and its kinetics before and after progression on aromatase inhibitor (AI) treatment. Patients and methods: ESR1 circulating D538G and Y537S/ N/ C mutations were retrospectively analyzed by digital droplet PCR after first-line AI failure in patients treated consecutively from 2010 to 2012 for hormone receptor-positive metastatic breast cancer. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were analyzed according to circulating mutational status and subsequent lines of treatment. The kinetics of ESR1 mutation before (3 and 6 months) and after (3 months) AI progression were determined in the available archive plasmas. Results: Circulating ESR1 mutations were found at AI progression in 44/ 144 patients included (30.6%). Median follow-up from AI initiation was 40 months (range 4-94). The median OS was decreased in patients with circulating ESR1 mutation than in patients without mutation (15.5 versus 23.8 months, P=0.0006). The median PFS was also significantly decreased in patients with ESR1 mutation than in patients without mutation (5.9 vs 7 months, P=0.002). After AI failure, there was no difference in outcome for patients receiving chemotherapy (n = 58) versus non-AI endocrine therapy (n=51) in patients with and without ESR1 mutation. ESR1 circulating mutations were detectable in 75% of all cases before AI progression, whereas the kinetics 3 months after progression did not correlate with outcome. Conclusion: ESR1 circulating mutations are independent risk factors for poor outcome after AI failure, and are frequently detectable before clinical progression. Interventional studies based on ESR1 circulating status are warranted.
引用
收藏
页码:74448 / 74459
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Circulating ESR1 mutations at the end of aromatase inhibitor adjuvant treatment and after relapse in breast cancer patients
    Violette Allouchery
    Ludivine Beaussire
    Anne Perdrix
    David Sefrioui
    Laetitia Augusto
    Cécile Guillemet
    Nasrin Sarafan-Vasseur
    Frédéric Di Fiore
    Florian Clatot
    Breast Cancer Research, 20
  • [2] Circulating ESR1 mutations at the end of aromatase inhibitor adjuvant treatment and after relapse in breast cancer patients
    Allouchery, Violette
    Beaussire, Ludivine
    Perdrix, Anne
    Sefrioui, David
    Augusto, Laetitia
    Guillemet, Cecile
    Sarafan-Vasseur, Nasrin
    Di Fiore, Frederic
    Clatot, Florian
    BREAST CANCER RESEARCH, 2018, 20
  • [3] Short report: Monitoring ESR1 mutations by circulating tumor DNA in aromatase inhibitor resistant metastatic breast cancer
    Sefrioui, David
    Perdrix, Anne
    Sarafan-Vasseur, Nasrin
    Dolfus, Claire
    Dujon, Antoine
    Picquenot, Jean-Michel
    Delacour, Julien
    Cornic, Marie
    Bohers, Elodie
    Leheurteur, Marianne
    Rigal, Olivier
    Tennevet, Isabelle
    Thery, Jean-Christophe
    Alexandru, Cristina
    Guillemet, Cecile
    Moldovan, Cristian
    Veyret, Corinne
    Frebourg, Thierry
    Di Fiore, Frederic
    Clatot, Florian
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2015, 137 (10) : 2513 - 2519
  • [4] ESR1 mutations in breast cancer
    Dustin, Derek
    Gu, Guowei
    Fuqua, Suzanne A. W.
    CANCER, 2019, 125 (21) : 3714 - 3728
  • [5] The Impact of ESR1 Mutations on the Treatment of Metastatic Breast Cancer
    Pejerrey, Sasha M.
    Dustin, Derek
    Kim, Jin-Ah
    Gu, Guowei
    Rechoum, Yassine
    Fuqua, Suzanne A. W.
    HORMONES & CANCER, 2018, 9 (04): : 215 - 228
  • [6] The Impact of ESR1 Mutations on the Treatment of Metastatic Breast Cancer
    Sasha M. Pejerrey
    Derek Dustin
    Jin-Ah Kim
    Guowei Gu
    Yassine Rechoum
    Suzanne A. W. Fuqua
    Hormones and Cancer, 2018, 9 : 215 - 228
  • [7] Incidence and clinical significance of ESR1 mutations in heavily pretreated metastatic breast cancer patients
    Niu, Jiaxin
    Andres, Grant
    Kramer, Kim
    Kundranda, Madappa N.
    Alvarez, Ricardo H.
    Klimant, Eiko
    Parikh, Ankur R.
    Tan, Bradford
    Staren, Edgar D.
    Markman, Maurie
    ONCOTARGETS AND THERAPY, 2015, 8 : 3323 - 3328
  • [8] ESR1 mutations in breast cancer
    Clatot, Florian
    Augusto, Laetitia
    Di Fiore, Frederic
    AGING-US, 2017, 9 (01): : 17 - 18
  • [9] Increased frequency of ESR1 mutation in metastatic breast cancer by dosing selective estrogen receptor modulator followed by aromatase inhibitor
    Takeshima, Kaoru
    Hayashida, Tetsu
    Maeda, Hinako
    Nakashoji, Ayako
    Yokoe, Takamichi
    Seki, Tomoko
    Takahashi, Maiko
    Kitagawa, Yuko
    ONCOLOGY LETTERS, 2020, 20 (02) : 1231 - 1238
  • [10] ESR1 mutations: a new biomarker in breast cancer
    Carausu, Marcela
    Bidard, Francois-Clement
    Callens, Celine
    Melaabi, Samia
    Jeannot, Emmanuelle
    Pierga, Jean-Yves
    Cabel, Luc
    EXPERT REVIEW OF MOLECULAR DIAGNOSTICS, 2019, 19 (07) : 599 - 611