Paternalism in Public Health Care

被引:38
作者
Nys, Thomas R. V. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Utrecht, Dept Philosophy, NL-3584 CS Utrecht, Netherlands
关键词
D O I
10.1093/phe/phn002
中图分类号
B82 [伦理学(道德学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Measures in public health care (PHC) seem vulnerable to charges of paternalism: their aim is to protect, restore, or promote people's health, but the public character of these measures seems to leave insufficient room for respect for individual autonomy. This paper wants to explore three challenges to these charges: (i) Measures in PHC are aimed to protect, restore or promote 'deep autonomy', (ii) Measures in PHC are directed at the public and, as such, they do show respect for autonomy, and (iii) Some measures in PHC can be justified on grounds of justice and need not be defended as cases of 'justified paternalism'. Although charges of unjustified paternalism in PHC might still be relevant, we should at least face these different challenges.
引用
收藏
页码:64 / 72
页数:9
相关论文
共 14 条
  • [1] Archard D, 2007, AUTONOMY PATERNALISM, P113
  • [2] Beauchamp TL., 1983, Principles of biomedical ethics, V2
  • [3] Bou-Habib Paul, 2006, UTILITAS, V18, P243, DOI DOI 10.1017/S0953820806002020
  • [4] DANIELS N, 1981, PHILOS PUBLIC AFF, V10, P146
  • [5] FEINBERG J, 1986, HARM SELF, P3
  • [6] Garren D.J., 2006, PHILOS BOOKS, V47, P334
  • [7] Geenens Raf., 2007, Ratio Juris, V20, P355, DOI [10.1111/j.1467-9337.2007.00365.x, DOI 10.1111/J.1467-9337.2007.00365.X]
  • [8] GERT B, 1976, PHILOS PUBLIC AFF, V6, P45
  • [9] Hartogh den G., 2004, FILOSOFIE PRAKTIJK, V1, P38
  • [10] Honneth Axel., 1995, STRUGGLE RECOGNITION