Exercise for cancer cachexia in adults: Executive summary of a Cochrane Collaboration systematic review

被引:75
|
作者
Grande, Antonio Jose [1 ,2 ]
Silva, Valter [3 ]
Maddocks, Matthew [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Oxford, Nuffield Dept Populat Hlth, Oxford, England
[2] Univ Extremo Sul Catarinense, Lab Evidence Based Practice, Criciuma, SC, Brazil
[3] Univ Fed Sao Paulo, Dept Internal Med, Sao Paulo, Brazil
[4] Kings Coll London, Cicely Saunders Inst, Dept Palliat Care Policy & Rehabil, London WC2R 2LS, England
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
Exercise; Cachexia; Cancer; Human; Physical activity; PHYSICAL-EXERCISE; THERAPEUTIC EXERCISE; MUSCLE MASS; STRENGTH; PROGRAM; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1002/jcsm.12055
中图分类号
R592 [老年病学]; C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 100203 ;
摘要
Background Cancer cachexia is a complex syndrome characterized by an ongoing loss of skeletal muscle mass and progressive functional impairment. A proactive management approach is recommended, including physical exercise to maintain function via modulation of muscle metabolism, insulin sensitivity and levels of inflammation. The review aimed to determine the safety, acceptability and effectiveness of exercise in adults with cancer cachexia. Secondary aims, subject to the data availability, were to compare effectiveness according to the characteristics of the study intervention or population. Methods We sought randomised controlled trials (RCTs) in adults meeting international criteria for cancer cachexia, comparing a programme of exercise as a sole or adjunct intervention to usual care or an active control. CENTRAL, MEDLINE, EMBASE, DARE and HTA, ISI Web of Science, LILACS, PEDro, SciVerse SCOPUS, Biosis Previews PreMEDLINE and Open Grey databases were searched up to June 2014. Two authors independently assessed studies for eligibility. Results We screened 3154 separate titles and abstracts, and reviewed 16 full-texts. Corresponding authors were contacted to determine if samples met cachexia staging criteria. Most authors did not explore this concept. No trial met review eligibility criteria. We were unable to perform a meta-analysis to determine any effects from exercise intervention. Conclusion Despite a strong rationale for the use of exercise, there is insufficient evidence to determine safety and effectiveness in patients with cancer cachexia. Findings from ongoing studies are awaited. Assessment of cachexia domains, ideally against international criteria, is required for future trials of exercise and supportive care interventions.
引用
收藏
页码:208 / 211
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Exercise interventions for individuals with advanced cancer: A systematic review
    Dittus, Kim L.
    Gramling, Robert E.
    Ades, Philip A.
    PREVENTIVE MEDICINE, 2017, 104 : 124 - 132
  • [32] Predictors of adherence to exercise interventions during and after cancer treatment: A systematic review
    Ormel, H. L.
    van der Schoot, G. G. F.
    Sluiter, W. J.
    Jalving, M.
    Gietema, J. A.
    Walenkamp, A. M. E.
    PSYCHO-ONCOLOGY, 2018, 27 (03) : 713 - 724
  • [33] Physical activity and exercise interventions in adults with cerebral palsy: a systematic review of quantitative and qualitative studies
    Andreopoulou, Georgia
    Meharry, John B.
    Jagadamma, Kavi C.
    van der Linden, Marietta L.
    DISABILITY AND REHABILITATION, 2025, 47 (09) : 2170 - 2184
  • [34] Effects of exercise, physical activity, and sports on physical fitness in adults with Down syndrome: A systematic review
    Montalva-Valenzuela, Felipe
    Castillo-Paredes, Antonio
    Farias-Valenzuela, Claudio
    Andrades-Ramirez, Oscar
    Concha-Cisternas, Yeny
    Guzman-Munoz, Eduardo
    AIMS PUBLIC HEALTH, 2024, 11 (02): : 577 - 600
  • [35] Biomarker endpoints in cancer cachexia clinical trials: Systematic Review 5 of the cachexia endpoint series
    Yule, Michael S.
    Thompson, Joshua
    Leesahatsawat, Khachonphat
    Sousa, Mariana S.
    Anker, Stefan D.
    Arends, Jann
    Balstad, Trude R.
    Brown, Leo R.
    Bye, Asta
    Dajani, Olav
    Fallon, Marie
    Hjermstad, Marianne J.
    Jakobsen, Gunnhild
    McDonald, James
    McGovern, Josh
    Roeland, Eric J.
    Sayers, Judith
    Skipworth, Richard J. E.
    Ottestad, Inger O.
    Philips, Iain
    Simpson, Melanie R.
    Solheim, Tora S.
    Vagnildhaug, Ola Magne
    McMillan, Donald
    Laird, Barry J. A.
    Dolan, Ross D.
    JOURNAL OF CACHEXIA SARCOPENIA AND MUSCLE, 2024, 15 (03) : 853 - 867
  • [36] Nonpharmacological Management of Cancer-Related Cachexia: A Systematic Review
    Constantina, Cloconi
    Mary, Economou
    George, Orphanos
    Konstantinos, Ferentinos
    Christiana, Kouta
    Nicos, Middleton
    Andreas, Charalambous
    SEMINARS IN ONCOLOGY NURSING, 2025, 41 (01)
  • [37] Cannabinoid interventions for improving cachexia outcomes in cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Simon, Lucile
    Baldwin, Christine
    Kalea, Anastasia Z.
    Slee, Adrian
    JOURNAL OF CACHEXIA SARCOPENIA AND MUSCLE, 2022, 13 (01) : 23 - 41
  • [38] Exercise and physical performance in older adults with sarcopenic obesity: A systematic review
    Ghiotto, Laura
    Muollo, Valentina
    Tatangelo, Toni
    Schena, Federico
    Rossi, Andrea P.
    FRONTIERS IN ENDOCRINOLOGY, 2022, 13
  • [39] Characteristics of interventions with exercise according to the adherence of adults with obesity: A systematic review
    Streb, Anne Ribeiro
    Tozetto, Willen Remon
    da Silva, Caroline Soares
    Bertuol, Cecilia
    Minatto, Giseli
    Del Duca, Giovani Firpo
    CLINICAL OBESITY, 2024,