Evaluation of prognostic value of MEDS, MEWS, and CURB-65 criteria and sepsis I and sepsis III criteria in patients with community-acquired infection in emergency department

被引:2
|
作者
Begenen, Maruf [1 ]
Durak, Vahide Aslihan [2 ]
Akalin, Halis [3 ]
Armagan, Erol [2 ]
机构
[1] Bursa Gemlik State Hosp, Bursa, Turkey
[2] Uludag Univ, Fac Med, Dept Emergency Med, TR-16000 Bursa, Turkey
[3] Uludag Univ, Fac Med, Dept Infect Dis & Clin Microbiol, Bursa, Turkey
关键词
Emergency department; sepsis; mortality; ORGAN FAILURE ASSESSMENT; UNITED-STATES; SEPTIC SHOCK; MORTALITY; CARE; DEFINITIONS; PERFORMANCE; PREDICTION; PNEUMONIA; TRENDS;
D O I
10.1177/1024907919844866
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Background: Early and effective treatment of patients with sepsis requires early recognition in emergency department and understanding the severity of the disease. Many studies have been conducted for this purpose, and many of scoring systems have been developed that provide early recognition of these patients and show their severity. Objectives: The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of the scoring systems used to determine the mortality of patients with infections admitted in emergency department. Methods: In all, 400 patients who admitted to Uludag University Hospital Emergency Department were prospectively included in this study. In addition to Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome score, Quick SOFA score, Mortality in Emergency Department Sepsis score, Modified Early Warning Score, and Charlson Comorbidity Index score in all patients, CURB-65 score was calculated in the patients diagnosed with pneumonia. It has been aimed to determine the power of these scores' predictive mortality rates and their superiority to each other. Results: It was found that Mortality in Emergency Department Sepsis score and Quick SOFA score could be used with similar efficacy (respectively p = 0.761 and p = 0.073) in determining early mortality in emergency department (5th and 14th days) and that MEDS score was more effective (p < 0.001) in predicting the 28th-day mortality. While these recommendations were valid in patients diagnosed with pneumonia, it was determined that CURB-65 score could also be used to estimate 5th-, 14th-, and 28th-day mortalities (respectively, for the 5th day, p = 0.894 and p = 0.256; for the 14th day, p = 0.425 and p = 0.098; and for the 28th day, p = 0.095 and p = 0.158). The power of Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome score, previously used to identify sepsis, in predicting mortality was detected to be lower. Conclusion: Mortality in Emergency Department Sepsis score and Quick SOFA score could be used with similar efficacy in determining early mortality in emergency department. However, if you want to predict 28th-day mortality rate, it can be better to use Mortality in Emergency Department Sepsis score or CURB-65 (in patients diagnosed with pneumonia).
引用
收藏
页码:277 / 285
页数:9
相关论文
共 35 条
  • [1] Evaluation of the modified MEDS, MEWS score and Charlson comorbidity index in patients with community acquired sepsis in the emergency department
    Cildir, Ergun
    Bulut, Mehtap
    Akalin, Halis
    Kocabas, Egemen
    Ocakoglu, Gokhan
    Aydin, Sule Akkose
    INTERNAL AND EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2013, 8 (03) : 255 - 260
  • [2] Evaluation of community-acquired sepsis by PIRO system in the emergency department
    Chen, Yun-Xia
    Li, Chun-Sheng
    INTERNAL AND EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2013, 8 (06) : 521 - 527
  • [3] Prognostic value of diagnostic scales in community-acquired sepsis mortality at an emergency service. Prognosis in community-adquired sepsis
    Clar, Jorge
    Rosa Oltra, Maria
    Benavent, Raquel
    Pinto, Carolina
    Ruiz, Adrian
    Teresa Sanchez, Maria
    Noceda, Jose
    Redon, Josep
    Jose Forner, Maria
    BMC EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2021, 21 (01)
  • [4] Evaluation of the modified MEDS, MEWS score and Charlson comorbidity index in patients with community acquired sepsis in the emergency department
    Ergün Çıldır
    Mehtap Bulut
    Halis Akalın
    Egemen Kocabaş
    Gökhan Ocakoğlu
    Şule Akköse Aydın
    Internal and Emergency Medicine, 2013, 8 : 255 - 260
  • [5] CURB-65 Performance Among Admitted and Discharged Emergency Department Patients With Community-acquired Pneumonia
    Sharp, Adam L.
    Jones, Jason P.
    Wu, Ivan
    Huynh, Dan
    Kocher, Keith E.
    Shah, Nirav R.
    Gould, Michael K.
    ACADEMIC EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2016, 23 (04) : 400 - 405
  • [6] Prognostic value of proadrenomedullin in severe sepsis and septic shock patients with community-acquired pneumonia
    Suberviola, Borja
    Castellanos-Ortega, Alvaro
    Llorca, Javier
    Ortiz, Fernando
    Iglesias, David
    Prieto, Belen
    SWISS MEDICAL WEEKLY, 2012, 142
  • [7] An observational cohort study of the performance of the REDS score compared to the SIRS criteria, NEWS2, CURB65, SOFA, MEDS and PIRO scores to risk-stratify emergency department suspected sepsis
    Sivayoham, Narani
    Hussain, Adil N.
    Shabbo, Luke
    Christie, Dylon
    ANNALS OF MEDICINE, 2021, 53 (01) : 1863 - 1874
  • [8] Evaluation of community-acquired sepsis by PIRO system in the emergency department
    Yun-Xia Chen
    Chun-Sheng Li
    Internal and Emergency Medicine, 2013, 8 : 521 - 527
  • [9] Prognostic value of Pneumonia Severity Index, CURB-65, CRB-65, and procalcitonin in community-acquired pneumonia in Singapore
    Zhang, Zoe Xiaozhu
    Zhang, Weidong
    Liu, Ping
    Yang, Yong
    Tan, Wan Cheng
    Ng, Han Seong
    Fong, Kok Yong
    PROCEEDINGS OF SINGAPORE HEALTHCARE, 2016, 25 (03) : 139 - 147
  • [10] Prognostic value of diagnostic scales in community-acquired sepsis mortality at an emergency service. Prognosis in community-adquired sepsis
    Jorge Clar
    María Rosa Oltra
    Raquel Benavent
    Carolina Pinto
    Adrian Ruiz
    Maria Teresa Sanchez
    Jose Noceda
    Josep Redon
    Maria Jose Forner
    BMC Emergency Medicine, 21