Considering students' perceptions: The distance education student satisfaction model

被引:0
|
作者
Sahin, Ismail [1 ]
Shelley, Mack [2 ]
机构
[1] Selcuk Univ, Coll Educ, Dept Comp & Instruct Technol, Konya, Turkey
[2] Iowa State Univ, Ames, IA 50011 USA
来源
EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGY & SOCIETY | 2008年 / 11卷 / 03期
关键词
distance education; student satisfaction; College of Education;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
In the current study, the Distance Education Student Satisfaction Model, estimated as a structural equation model, is proposed to understand better what predicts student satisfaction from online learning environments. In the present study, the following variables are employed based on the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) (Davis, Bagozzi, & Warshaw, 1989) and literature: computer knowledge, flexibility of distance education, usefulness of distance education, and distance education satisfaction. Results suggest that as long as students have the skills to use online tools and perceive that distance education is a useful and flexible way of learning, communicating, and sharing, their enjoyment from online instruction will be promoted. Ultimately, this satisfaction may lead to higher levels of engagement, learning, and success in the distance education setting. Data collected from 195 undergraduate students are analyzed using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences and Analysis of Moment Structures statistical software. Implications of the findings of the present study are crucial for instructors, practitioners, and institutions planning to offer or currently engaged in offering distance education courses.
引用
收藏
页码:216 / 223
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Student Motivation in CORONAPOLIS: Effects of Transactional Distance Perceptions on EFL Undergraduate Students' Motivation
    Tulgar, Aysegul Takkac
    GIST-EDUCATION AND LEARNING RESEARCH JOURNAL, 2022, (25): : 111 - 138
  • [42] A pragmatic model of student satisfaction: a viewpoint of private higher education
    Osman, Abu Rashed
    Saputra, Ruswiati Surya
    QUALITY ASSURANCE IN EDUCATION, 2019, 27 (02) : 142 - 165
  • [43] Student satisfaction with short learning programmes at a distance learning institution
    Lemmer, E. M.
    Muller, H.
    AFRICA EDUCATION REVIEW, 2011, 8 (03) : 416 - 433
  • [44] The university students’ self-regulated effort, flexibility and satisfaction in distance education
    Zeynep Turan
    Sevda Kucuk
    Sinem Cilligol Karabey
    International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 19
  • [45] The university students' self-regulated effort, flexibility and satisfaction in distance education
    Turan, Zeynep
    Kucuk, Sevda
    Karabey, Sinem Cilligol
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGY IN HIGHER EDUCATION, 2022, 19 (01)
  • [46] Student satisfaction with Portuguese higher education institutions: the view of different types of students
    Sarrico C.S.
    Rosa M.J.
    Tertiary Education and Management, 2014, 20 (2) : 165 - 178
  • [47] Accessibility of the Distance Education Model for Students with Visual Impairment
    Othmani, Boulbaba
    Luz Cacheiro-Gonzalez, Maria
    Rodrigo-San Juan, Covadonga
    Lorenzo Perez, Victor Alberto
    REVISTA DE EDUCACION INCLUSIVA, 2018, 11 (01): : 25 - 38
  • [48] Online exams in higher education: Exploring distance learning students' acceptance and satisfaction
    Aristeidou, Maria
    Cross, Simon
    Rossade, Klaus-Dieter
    Wood, Carlton
    Rees, Terri
    Paci, Patrizia
    JOURNAL OF COMPUTER ASSISTED LEARNING, 2024, 40 (01) : 342 - 359
  • [49] The effectiveness of mentoring in the Distance Teacher Education Programme at the Lesotho College of Education: student teachers' and tutors' perceptions
    Mohono-Mahlatsi, Lydia
    van Tonder, Fanus
    SOUTH AFRICAN JOURNAL OF EDUCATION, 2006, 26 (03) : 383 - 396
  • [50] Impact of distance education via interactive videoconferencing on students' course performance and satisfaction
    Klibanov, Olga M.
    Dolder, Christian
    Anderson, Kevin
    Kehr, Heather A.
    Woods, J. Andrew
    ADVANCES IN PHYSIOLOGY EDUCATION, 2018, 42 (01) : 21 - 25