The Efficacy of Neoadjuvant Versus Adjuvant Therapy for Resectable Esophageal Cancer Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

被引:14
|
作者
Xiao, Xin [1 ]
Hong, Hyokyoung G. [2 ]
Zeng, Xiaoxi [3 ]
Yang, Yu-Shang [1 ]
Luan, Si-Yuan [1 ]
Li, Yi [4 ]
Chen, Long-Qi [1 ]
Yuan, Yong [1 ]
机构
[1] West China Hosp, Dept Thorac Surg, 37 Guoxue Alley, Chengdu, Sichuan, Peoples R China
[2] Michigan State Univ, Dept Stat & Probabil, E Lansing, MI 48824 USA
[3] West China Hosp, Big Data Ctr, 37 Guoxue Alley, Chengdu, Sichuan, Peoples R China
[4] Univ Michigan, Dept Biostat, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
关键词
SQUAMOUS-CELL CARCINOMA; PHASE-III TRIAL; POSTOPERATIVE RADIATION-THERAPY; PREOPERATIVE CHEMOTHERAPY; THORACIC ESOPHAGUS; PERIOPERATIVE CHEMOTHERAPY; CURATIVE RESECTION; PLUS SURGERY; CHEMORADIOTHERAPY; RADIOTHERAPY;
D O I
10.1007/s00268-020-05721-w
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective Inconclusive results are available as to whether chemo/radiotherapy should be administered to resectable esophageal cancer patients before surgery (neoadjuvant therapy) or after surgery (adjuvant therapy). The paper, via a meta-analysis of effects of treatment modalities when administering chemo/radiotherapy, aims to systematically evaluate the effect of timing of chemo/radiotherapy and surgery. Methods We performed a systematic literature search for clinical trials of neoadjuvant and adjuvant therapy for patients with esophageal cancer. Using meta-analysis, we conducted direct and adjusted indirect comparisons of overall survival, complete resection rate (R0 resection), perioperative mortality, leakage rate and local recurrence in patients with resectable esophageal cancer. Results A total of 32 studies involving 7985 patients with esophageal cancer were included in the meta-analysis. Twenty-five randomized controlled studies indirectly compared neoadjuvant/adjuvant therapy with surgery alone, while five non-randomized controlled studies and two randomized controlled studies directly compared neoadjuvant with adjuvant therapy. Neoadjuvant therapy followed by surgery, compared with surgery along with adjuvant therapy, showed a significant overall survival advantage in our pooled analysis (HR 0.88; 95% CI 0.79-0.98). Directly compared with adjuvant therapy, neoadjuvant therapy demonstrated a lower local recurrence rate (OR 0.56; 95% CI 0.43-0.74) with low heterogeneity (I-2= 1%). Neoadjuvant therapy, comparing to surgery with or without adjuvant therapy, showed a significantly higher R0 resection rate (OR 2.86; 95% CI 2.02-4.04) with moderate heterogeneity (I-2= 38%) and no significant differences in postoperative anastomotic leakage (P= 0.50). However, neoadjuvant therapy, compared with surgery adjuvant therapy, significantly increased perioperative mortality in both direct and indirect comparisons (P< 0.01). Conclusions We found that neoadjuvant therapy was associated with higher overall survival and R0 resection rate without increasing postoperative anastomotic leakage for patients with resectable esophageal cancer, whereas neoadjuvant therapy was associated with higher perioperative mortality after esophagectomy.
引用
收藏
页码:4161 / 4174
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for resectable esophageal carcinoma: A meta-analysis
    Jin, Hai-Lin
    Zhu, Hong
    Ling, Ting-Sheng
    Zhang, Hong-Jie
    Shi, Rui-Hua
    WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2009, 15 (47) : 5983 - 5991
  • [22] Perioperative chemotherapy versus adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with resectable gastric cancer: A systematic review with meta-analysis
    Wei, Chenyu
    Du, Xuelin
    Hu, Jiexuan
    Dong, Yin
    Chen, Yan
    Cao, Bangwei
    CRITICAL REVIEWS IN ONCOLOGY HEMATOLOGY, 2024, 198
  • [23] Neoadjuvant chemotherapy for patients with resectable colorectal cancer liver metastases: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Zhang, Yue
    Ge, Long
    Weng, Jun
    Tuo, Wen-Yu
    Liu, Bin
    Ma, Shi-Xun
    Yang, Ke-Hu
    Cai, Hui
    WORLD JOURNAL OF CLINICAL CASES, 2021, 9 (22) : 6357 - 6379
  • [24] Upfront Surgery versus Neoadjuvant Therapy for Resectable Pancreatic Cancer: Systematic Review and Bayesian Network Meta-analysis
    Bradley, Alison
    Van Der Meer, Robert
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2019, 9 (1)
  • [25] Comments on "Comparison of different neoadjuvant treatments for resectable locoregional esophageal cancer: A systematic review and network meta-analysis"
    Tsang, Yuk-Ming
    Hsu, Chen-Xiong
    Shueng, Pei-Wei
    THORACIC CANCER, 2022, 13 (23) : 3436 - 3436
  • [26] Comparison of outcomes between neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with locally advanced esophageal cancer: A network meta-analysis
    Fan, Ningbo
    Wang, Zhefang
    Zhou, Chenghui
    Bludau, Marc
    Contino, Gianmarco
    Zhao, Yue
    Bruns, Christiane
    ECLINICALMEDICINE, 2021, 42
  • [27] Survival benefits of neoadjuvant chemo(radio)therapy versus surgery first in patients with resectable or borderline resectable pancreatic cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Pan, Long
    Fang, Jing
    Tong, Chenhao
    Chen, Mingyu
    Zhang, Bin
    Juengpanich, Sarun
    Wang, Yifan
    Cai, Xiujun
    WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2020, 18 (01)
  • [28] Elective nodal irradiation versus involved-field irradiation in patients with esophageal cancer receiving neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy: a network meta-analysis
    Liu, Tingting
    Ding, Silu
    Dang, Jun
    Wang, Hui
    Chen, Jun
    Li, Guang
    RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2019, 14 (01)
  • [29] Efficacy of Neoadjuvant Versus Adjuvant Therapy for Resectable Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma: A Decision Analysis
    Sharma, Gaurav
    Whang, Edward E.
    Ruan, Daniel T.
    Ito, Hiromichi
    ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2015, 22 : S1229 - S1237
  • [30] ADC as a predictor of pathologic response to neoadjuvant therapy in esophageal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Maffazzioli, Leticia
    Zilio, Mariana B.
    Klamt, Alexandre L.
    Duarte, Juliana A.
    Mazzini, Guilherme S.
    Campos, Vinicius J.
    Chedid, Marcio F.
    Gurski, Richard R.
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2020, 30 (07) : 3934 - 3942