Effects of etching and adhesive applications on the bond strength between composite resin and glass-ionomer cements

被引:10
|
作者
Pamir, Tijen [1 ]
Sen, Bilge Hakan [2 ]
Evcin, Ozgur [1 ]
机构
[1] Ege Univ, Sch Dent, Dept Restorat Dent, TR-35100 Izmir, Turkey
[2] Ege Univ, Sch Dent, Dept Endodontol, TR-35100 Izmir, Turkey
关键词
Glass-ionomer cements; Composite resins; Acid etching; Dental adhesives; RESTORATIVE MATERIALS; MICROLEAKAGE; DENTIN; ROOT; SANDWICH; FAILURE; SURFACE;
D O I
10.1590/S1678-77572012000600008
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Objective: This study determined the effects of various surface treatment modalities on the bond strength of composite resins to glass-ionomer cements. Material and Methods: Conventional (Ketac (TM) Molar Quick Applicap (TM)) or resin-modified (Photac (TM) Fil Quick Aplicap (TM)) glass-ionomer cements were prepared. Two-step etch-rinse & bond adhesive (Adper (TM) Single Bond 2) or single-step self-etching adhesive (Adper (TM) Prompt (TM) L-Pop (TM)) was applied to the set cements. In the etch-rinse & bond group, the sample surfaces were pre-treated as follows: (1) no etching, (2) 15 s of etching with 35% phosphoric acid, (3) 30 s of etching, and (4) 60 s of etching. Following the placement of the composite resin (Filtek (TM) Z250), the bond strength was measured in a universal testing machine and the data obtained were analyzed with the two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by the Tukey's HSD post hoc analysis (p=0.05). Then, the fractured surfaces were examined by scanning electron microscopy. Results: The bond strength of the composite resin to the conventional glass-ionomer cement was significantly lower than that to the resin-modified glass-ionomer cement (p<0.001). No significant differences were determined between the self-etching and etch-rinse & bond adhesives at any etching time (p>0.05). However, a greater bond strength was obtained with 30 s of phosphoric acid application. Conclusions: The resin-modified glass-ionomer cement improved the bond strength of the composite resin to the glass-ionomer cement. Both etch-rinse & bond and self-etching adhesives may be used effectively in the lamination of glass-ionomer cements. However, an etching time of at least 30 s appears to be optimal.
引用
收藏
页码:636 / 642
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] The effect of dentin age on the microshear bond strength and microleakage of glass-ionomer cements
    Techa-ungkul, Chutima
    Sakoolnamarka, Rangsima
    GERODONTOLOGY, 2021, 38 (03) : 259 - 266
  • [42] CLINICAL-APPLICATIONS OF GLASS-IONOMER CEMENTS
    MCLEAN, JW
    OPERATIVE DENTISTRY, 1992, : 184 - 190
  • [43] Novel resin modified glass-ionomer cements with improved flexural strength and ease of handling
    Xie, D
    Wu, W
    Puckett, A
    Farmer, B
    Mays, JW
    EUROPEAN POLYMER JOURNAL, 2004, 40 (02) : 343 - 351
  • [45] Water sorption and mechanical strength of resin-modified glass-ionomer cements.
    Akashi, A
    Matsuya, Y
    Akamine, A
    JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 1998, 77 : 688 - 688
  • [46] Compomers: between glass-ionomer cements and composites
    Meyer, JM
    Cattani-Lorente, MA
    Dupuis, V
    BIOMATERIALS, 1998, 19 (06) : 529 - 539
  • [47] Fracture toughness of conventional, resin-modified glass-ionomer and composite luting cements
    Mitchell, CA
    Douglas, WH
    Cheng, YS
    DENTAL MATERIALS, 1999, 15 (01) : 7 - 13
  • [48] Bond strength evaluation of composite resin bonded to glass ionomer cements after different periods of setting
    Costa, Sebastiao Batista
    Dutra de Oliveira, Rosa Virginia
    Montenegro, Robinsom Viegas
    Fonseca, Rodrigo Borges
    de Carvalho, Fabiola Galbiatti
    de Barros, Silvio
    Carlo, Hugo Lemes
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ADHESION AND ADHESIVES, 2013, 47 : 146 - 150
  • [49] GLASS IONOMER AND COMPOSITE RESIN CEMENTS - EFFECTS ON ORAL CELLS
    CAUGHMAN, WF
    CAUGHMAN, GB
    DOMINY, WT
    SCHUSTER, GS
    JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 1990, 63 (05): : 513 - 521
  • [50] CHANGES IN THE BIAXIAL FLEXURE STRENGTH OF GLASS-IONOMER CEMENTS
    POOLTHONG, S
    MORI, T
    JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 1995, 74 : 432 - 432