Can patient-reported outcomes predict re-operations after total hip replacement?

被引:25
作者
Eneqvist, Ted [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Nemes, Szilard [1 ,2 ]
Bulow, Erik [1 ,2 ]
Mohaddes, Maziar [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Rolfson, Ola [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register, Sagbladsgatan 11, S-41680 Gothenburg, Sweden
[2] Univ Gothenburg, Sahlgrenska Acad, Inst Clin Sci, Dept Orthopaed, Gothenburg, Sweden
[3] Sahlgrens Univ Hosp, Dept Orthopaed, Gothenburg, Sweden
关键词
Total hip replacement; Re-operation; Patient-reported outcome measurements; Prediction; ARTHROPLASTY REGISTER; RISK-FACTORS; OXFORD HIP; REVISION; SURVIVAL; SCORES; KNEE;
D O I
10.1007/s00264-017-3711-z
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Purpose We investigated if patient-reported outcomes (PROMs) one year after total hip replacement (THR) can predict the risk of re-operation using data from the Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register. Methods A total of 75,899 patients with THR due to osteoarthritis operated in 2002-2014 were included. We used Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression to investigate the relationship between one-year post-operative PROMs and risk of re-operation (all types of further hip surgery). The predictive power of the model and post-operative PROMs were evaluated by concordance index (C). Results Kaplan-Meier estimates for not being re-operated at eight years was 95.5% (95%CI; 95.3-95.8). Cox regression analyses showed that all PROMs, except for EQ-VAS, were associated with re-operation. The full model had a concordance index of 0.68. Satisfaction (C = 0.65) and pain (C = 0.65) in isolation had the highest predictive power. Conclusions Worse PROMs predicted higher risk of re-operation. Therefore, we believe PROMs may be helpful in identifying patients at risk for re-operation and timely address their problems.
引用
收藏
页码:273 / 279
页数:7
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]   What is the Prognosis of Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty in Patients 55 Years and Younger? [J].
Adelani, Muyibat A. ;
Crook, Karla ;
Barrack, Robert L. ;
Maloney, William J. ;
Clohisy, John C. .
CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2014, 472 (05) :1518-1525
[2]   The Cost-effectiveness of Routine Follow-up After Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty [J].
Bolz, Katharina Maria Dorothea ;
Crawford, Ross W. ;
Donnelly, Bill ;
Whitehouse, Sarah L. ;
Graves, Nicholas .
JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2010, 25 (02) :191-196
[3]   Oxford Hip Scores at 6 Months and 5 Years Are Associated With Total Hip Revision Within the Subsequent 2 Years [J].
Devane, Peter ;
Horne, Geoffrey ;
Gehling, Daniel J. .
CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2013, 471 (12) :3870-3874
[4]   The development of new research methods for the valuation of EQ-5D-5L [J].
Devlin, Nancy J. ;
Krabbe, Paul F. M. .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HEALTH ECONOMICS, 2013, 14 :S1-S3
[5]   Risk Factors for Early Revision After Total Hip Arthroplasty [J].
Dy, Christopher J. ;
Bozic, Kevin J. ;
Pan, Ting Jung ;
Wright, Timothy M. ;
Padgett, Douglas E. ;
Lyman, Stephen .
ARTHRITIS CARE & RESEARCH, 2014, 66 (06) :907-915
[6]  
Espehaug B, 1998, CLIN ORTHOP RELAT R, P135
[7]  
Garellick G, 2015, SWEDISH HIP ARTHROPL
[8]   Improved statistical analysis of pre- and post-treatment patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs): the applicability of piecewise linear regression splines [J].
Greene, M. E. ;
Rolfson, O. ;
Garellick, G. ;
Gordon, M. ;
Nemes, S. .
QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2015, 24 (03) :567-573
[9]  
Greene ME, 2015, CURR ADDICT REP, V473, P1
[10]   Survival model predictive accuracy and ROC curves [J].
Heagerty, PJ ;
Zheng, YY .
BIOMETRICS, 2005, 61 (01) :92-105