Acoustic metrics predict habitat type and vegetation structure in the Amazon

被引:37
作者
Do Nascimento, Leandro A. [1 ,2 ]
Campos-Cerqueira, Marconi [3 ]
Beard, Karen H. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Utah State Univ, Dept Wildland Resources, Logan, UT 84322 USA
[2] Utah State Univ, Ecol Ctr, Logan, UT 84322 USA
[3] Sieve Analyt Inc, San Juan, PR USA
关键词
Acoustic index; Ecoacoustics; Habitat heterogeneity; Habitat-specific soundscapes; Rapid biodiversity assessment; INVASIVE COQUI FROGS; SPECIES RICHNESS; INDEXES; BIODIVERSITY; SOUNDSCAPE; TEMPERATE; HETEROGENEITY; ABUNDANCES; HAWAII;
D O I
10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.106679
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
The rapidly developing field of ecoacoustics offers methods that can advance multi-taxa animal surveys at policy-relevant extents. While the field is promising, there remain foundational assumptions that need to be tested across different biomes before the methods can be applied widely. Here we test two of these assumptions in the Amazon: 1) that acoustic indices can be used to predict soundscapes of different habitat types, and 2) that acoustic indices are related to vegetation structure. We recorded soundscapes and collected vegetation data in 143 sites spanning six natural and two human-modified habitats in Virua National Park, Roraima, Brazil. We grouped the eight habitats into three categories based on vegetative characteristics and flooding regime: open habitats, flooded-forests, and non-flooded forests. Thirteen acoustic indices were calculated from 92,283 one-minute recordings to describe the soundscapes of the habitats. We found that each habitat type had unique and predictable soundscapes. Random forest models were 74% accurate at predicting the eight habitats types and 87% accurate at predicting the three broader habitats categories. The most important acoustic indices to distinguish habitats were the third quartile and centroid. Canopy cover significantly affected 11 of 13 acoustic indices, and while other vegetation variables (e.g., shrub cover and number of trees) appeared in top models for some indices, their effects were not significant. The best indices linking soundscapes to vegetation structure were the acoustic evenness index and skewness, with canopy cover explaining 81% and 52% of the variance in these indices, respectively. These results expand our knowledge regarding which acoustic indices best connect changes in habitats to changes in soundscapes. These findings are particularly important for diverse ecosystems, like the Amazon, which are known to have complex soundscapes with sound-producing animals that are difficult to detect with traditional survey methods (e.g., visual transects). Ultimately, our results suggest that soundscapes are able to track changes in biodiversity levels across major habitat types of the Amazon.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 67 条
[1]   Species Richness (of Insects) Drives the Use of Acoustic Space in the Tropics [J].
Aide, T. Mitchell ;
Hernandez-Serna, Andres ;
Campos-Cerqueira, Marconi ;
Acevedo-Charry, Orlando ;
Deichmann, Jessica L. .
REMOTE SENSING, 2017, 9 (11)
[2]   Multi-trophic invasion resistance in Hawaii: Bioacoustics, field surveys, and airborne remote sensing [J].
Boelman, Natalie T. ;
Asner, Gregory P. ;
Hart, Patrick J. ;
Martin, Roberta E. .
ECOLOGICAL APPLICATIONS, 2007, 17 (08) :2137-2144
[3]   Spatial heterogeneity of ambient sound at the habitat type level: ecological implications and applications [J].
Bormpoudakis, Dimitrios ;
Sueur, Jerome ;
Pantis, John D. .
LANDSCAPE ECOLOGY, 2013, 28 (03) :495-506
[4]   Rapid assessment of avian species richness and abundance using acoustic indices [J].
Bradfer-Lawrence, Tom ;
Bunnefeld, Nils ;
Gardner, Nick ;
Willis, Stephen G. ;
Dent, Daisy H. .
ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2020, 115
[5]   Guidelines for the use of acoustic indices in environmental research [J].
Bradfer-Lawrence, Tom ;
Gardner, Nick ;
Bunnefeld, Lynsey ;
Bunnefeld, Nils ;
Willis, Stephen G. ;
Dent, Daisy H. .
METHODS IN ECOLOGY AND EVOLUTION, 2019, 10 (10) :1796-1807
[6]   Using soundscapes to investigate homogenization of tropical forest diversity in selectively logged forests [J].
Burivalova, Zuzana ;
Purnomo ;
Wahyudi, Bambang ;
Boucher, Timothy M. ;
Ellis, Peter ;
Truskinger, Anthony ;
Towsey, Michael ;
Roe, Paul ;
Marthinus, Delon ;
Griscom, Bronson ;
Game, Edward T. .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED ECOLOGY, 2019, 56 (11) :2493-2504
[7]   Multimodel inference - understanding AIC and BIC in model selection [J].
Burnham, KP ;
Anderson, DR .
SOCIOLOGICAL METHODS & RESEARCH, 2004, 33 (02) :261-304
[8]   Connecting Earth observation to high-throughput biodiversity data [J].
Bush, Alex ;
Sollmann, Rahel ;
Wilting, Andreas ;
Bohmann, Kristine ;
Cole, Beth ;
Balzter, Heiko ;
Martius, Christopher ;
Zlinszky, Andras ;
Calvignac-Spencer, Sebastien ;
Cobbold, Christina A. ;
Dawson, Terence P. ;
Emerson, Brent C. ;
Ferrier, Simon ;
Gilbert, M. Thomas P. ;
Herold, Martin ;
Jones, Laurence ;
Leendertz, Fabian H. ;
Matthews, Louise ;
Millington, James D. A. ;
Olson, John R. ;
Ovaskainen, Otso ;
Raffaelli, Dave ;
Reeve, Richard ;
Roedel, Mark-Oliver ;
Rodgers, Torrey W. ;
Snape, Stewart ;
Visseren-Hamakers, Ingrid ;
Vogler, Alfried P. ;
White, Piran C. L. ;
Wooster, Martin J. ;
Yu, Douglas W. .
NATURE ECOLOGY & EVOLUTION, 2017, 1 (07)
[9]   Efficacy of extracting indices from large-scale acoustic recordings to monitor biodiversity [J].
Buxton, Rachel T. ;
McKenna, Megan F. ;
Clapp, Mary ;
Meyer, Erik ;
Stabenau, Erik ;
Angeloni, Lisa M. ;
Crooks, Kevin ;
Wittemyer, George .
CONSERVATION BIOLOGY, 2018, 32 (05) :1174-1184
[10]   How does FSC forest certification affect the acoustically active fauna in Madre de Dios, Peru? [J].
Campos-Cerqueira, Marconi ;
Mena, Jose Luis ;
Tejeda-Gomez, Vania ;
Aguilar-Amuchastegui, Naikoa ;
Gutierrez, Nelson ;
Aide, T. Mitchell .
REMOTE SENSING IN ECOLOGY AND CONSERVATION, 2020, 6 (03) :274-285