Prophylactic negative pressure wound therapy after lower extremity fracture surgery: a pilot study

被引:18
作者
Dingemans, Siem A. [1 ]
Birnie, Merel F. N. [1 ]
Backes, Manouk [1 ]
de Jong, Vincent M. [1 ]
Luitse, Jan S. [1 ]
Goslings, J. Carel [1 ]
Schepers, Tim [1 ]
机构
[1] Acad Med Ctr, Trauma Unit, Dept Surg, Meibergdreef 9,POB 22660, NL-1100 DD Amsterdam, Netherlands
关键词
Negative pressure wound therapy; Postoperative wound infection; Lower extremity fracture surgery; Prophylactic; Closed incision; SURGICAL INCISIONS; TRAUMA; INFECTIONS; TRIAL;
D O I
10.1007/s00264-018-3781-6
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Purpose Infectious complications following lower extremity fracture surgery are a major concern and account for a substantial socio-economic burden to society. The aim of this pilot study was to investigate the feasibility of a new portable single-use negative pressure wound therapy device in patients undergoing major foot ankle surgery. Methods Patients undergoing major foot ankle fracture surgery at a single level 1 trauma centre were eligible for this prospective case series. Patient characteristics were collected, as were fracture and surgical characteristics. Primary outcome was surgical site infection within 30 days as classified by the criteria from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Patients in the prospective cohort were case-matched with a historical cohort from the same institution. Results Sixty patients were included. In seven patients, the NPWT failed and treatment was ceased. Mean age was 44 years and 85% was ASA 1; 43% of the patients were actively smoking. Indications for surgery were midfoot, calcaneal, talar, and ankle fractures. In 53 patients, four (7.5%) surgical site infections occurred, two superficial (3.3%) and two (3.3%) deep infections. For 47 patients, a match was available. The incidence of surgical site infection did not statistically significantly differ between the prospective cohort and retrospective matched cohort (4.3 versus 14.9%, p = 0.29, respectively). This was also the case when looking at superficial and deep surgical site infections separately (0 versus 8.5%, p = 0.08, and 4.3 versus 6.4%, respectively). Conclusion We have observed surgical site infections in 7.5% of the patients with the use of prophylactic negative pressure wound therapy. The incidence of surgical site infections was not statistically significantly lower compared to a matched historical cohort.
引用
收藏
页码:747 / 753
页数:7
相关论文
共 20 条
  • [1] The effect of postoperative wound infections on functional outcome following intra-articular calcaneal fractures
    Backes, Manouk
    Schep, Niels W. L.
    Luitse, Jan S. K.
    Goslings, J. Carel
    Schepers, Tim
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF ORTHOPAEDIC AND TRAUMA SURGERY, 2015, 135 (08) : 1045 - 1052
  • [2] Berrios-Torres SI, 2017, JAMA SURG, P1
  • [3] Randomised controlled trial of single-dose antibiotic prophylaxis in surgical treatment of closed fractures: The Dutch Trauma Trial
    Boxma, H
    Broekhuizen, T
    Patka, P
    Oosting, H
    [J]. LANCET, 1996, 347 (9009) : 1133 - 1137
  • [4] Role of acute negative pressure wound therapy over primarily closed surgical incisions in acetabular fracture ORIF: A prospective randomized trial
    Crist, Brett D.
    Oladeji, Lasun O.
    Khazzam, Michael
    Della Rocca, Gregory J.
    Murtha, Yvonne M.
    Stannard, James P.
    [J]. INJURY-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THE CARE OF THE INJURED, 2017, 48 (07): : 1518 - 1521
  • [5] Surgical site infection: Incidence and impact on hospital utilization and treatment costs
    de Lissovoy, Gregory
    Fraeman, Kathy
    Hutchins, Valerie
    Murphy, Denise
    Song, David
    Vaughn, Brian B.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF INFECTION CONTROL, 2009, 37 (05) : 387 - 397
  • [6] A systematic review and meta-analysis including GRADE qualification of the risk of surgical site infections after prophylactic negative pressure wound therapy compared with conventional dressings in clean and contaminated surgery
    De Vries, Fleur E. E.
    Wallert, Elon D.
    Solomkin, Joseph S.
    Allegranzi, Benedetta
    Egger, Matthias
    Dellinger, E. Patchen
    Boermeester, Marja A.
    [J]. MEDICINE, 2016, 95 (36)
  • [7] Dingemans SA, 2016, J ORTHOP TRAUMA
  • [8] Current practice of antibiotic prophylaxis for surgical fixation of closed long bone fractures: A survey of 297 members of the Orthopaedic Trauma Association
    Gans I.
    Jain A.
    Sirisreetreerux N.
    Haut E.R.
    Hasenboehler E.A.
    [J]. Patient Safety in Surgery, 11 (1)
  • [9] Negative pressure wound therapy for management of the surgical incision in orthopaedic surgery A REVIEW OF EVIDENCE AND MECHANISMS FOR AN EMERGING INDICATION
    Karlakki, S.
    Brem, M.
    Giannini, S.
    Khanduja, V.
    Stannard, J.
    Martin, R.
    [J]. BONE & JOINT RESEARCH, 2013, 2 (12): : 276 - 284
  • [10] Guideline for Prevention of Surgical Site Infection, 1999
    Mangram, AJ
    Horan, TC
    Pearson, ML
    Silver, LC
    Jarvis, WR
    [J]. INFECTION CONTROL AND HOSPITAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1999, 20 (04) : 250 - 278