Leader Unethical Pro-Organizational Behavior and Employee Unethical Conduct: Social Learning of Moral Disengagement as a Behavioral Principle

被引:111
作者
Lian, Huiwen [1 ]
Huai, Mingyun [2 ]
Farh, Jiing-Lih [3 ]
Huang, Jia-Chi [4 ]
Lee, Cynthia [5 ]
Chao, Melody M. [6 ]
机构
[1] Univ Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40506 USA
[2] Tongji Univ, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[3] China Europe Int Business Sch, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[4] Natl Chengchi Univ, Taipei 11623, Taiwan
[5] Northeastern Univ, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[6] Hong Kong Univ Sci & Technol, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
关键词
leader unethical pro-organizational behavior; social learning; principle learning; moral disengagement; power distance; ETHICAL DECISION-MAKING; POWER DISTANCE; ABUSIVE SUPERVISION; CULTURAL-VALUES; BAD BARRELS; DARK SIDE; THINGS; IDENTIFICATION; APPLES; MODELS;
D O I
10.1177/0149206320959699
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Unethical behavior in organizations has attracted much attention among researchers, yet we know little about when and why unethical behavior conducted by leaders that is intended to benefit the organization-or leader unethical pro-organizational behavior (UPB)-might translate into employee unethical behavior. Drawing on a social-learning-of-principle perspective, which proposes that people can learn the principles that govern observed behaviors, we propose that employees, especially those with a high power distance orientation, can abstract and learn a moral disengagement behavioral principle by observing leader UPB. This learned moral disengagement behavioral principle then enables them to engage in unethical behaviors that may be intended to benefit or harm their organizations. In two multiwave field studies with data collected from real estate agents, we found overall support for our theoretical model but the moderating effect of power distance orientation. We discuss some key theoretical and practical implications of these findings.
引用
收藏
页码:350 / 379
页数:30
相关论文
共 78 条
[41]   Pursuit of Whose Happiness? Executive Leaders' Transformational Behaviors and Personal Values [J].
Fu, Ping Ping ;
Tsui, Anne S. ;
Liu, Jun ;
Li, Lan .
ADMINISTRATIVE SCIENCE QUARTERLY, 2010, 55 (02) :222-254
[42]   Cross-cultural organizational behavior [J].
Gelfand, Michele J. ;
Erez, Miriam ;
Aycan, Zeynep .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF PSYCHOLOGY, 2007, 58 :479-514
[43]   The Dark Side of Creativity: Original Thinkers Can Be More Dishonest [J].
Gino, Francesca ;
Ariely, Dan .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2012, 102 (03) :445-459
[44]   Dishonesty in the Name of Equity [J].
Gino, Francesca ;
Pierce, Lamar .
PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2009, 20 (09) :1153-1160
[45]   RELATIONSHIP-BASED APPROACH TO LEADERSHIP - DEVELOPMENT OF LEADER-MEMBER EXCHANGE (LMX) THEORY OF LEADERSHIP OVER 25 YEARS - APPLYING A MULTILEVEL MULTIDOMAIN PERSPECTIVE [J].
GRAEN, GB ;
UHLBIEN, M .
LEADERSHIP QUARTERLY, 1995, 6 (02) :219-247
[46]   Who stole the money, and when? Individual and situational determinants of employee theft [J].
Greenberg, J .
ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR AND HUMAN DECISION PROCESSES, 2002, 89 (01) :985-1003
[47]  
Highhouse S, 2009, STATISTICAL AND METHODOLOGICAL MYTHS AND URBAN LEGENDS: DOCTRINE, VERITY AND FABLE IN THE ORGANIZATIONAL AND SOCIAL SCIENCES, P247
[48]   A Brief Tutorial on the Development of Measures for Use in Survey Questionnaires [J].
Hinkin, Timothy R. .
ORGANIZATIONAL RESEARCH METHODS, 1998, 1 (01) :104-121
[49]  
Hofmann DA, 1998, J MANAGE, V24, P623, DOI 10.1016/S0149-2063(99)80077-4
[50]  
Hofstede G., 1980, CULTURES CONSEQUENCE