Hybrid aortic arch repair for complicated type B aortic dissection

Objective: This study analyzed the outcome of a combined endovascular and debranching procedure for hybrid aortic arch repair (HAR) in patients with complicated type B aortic dissection. Methods: Between February 2006 and August 2012, HAR was performed in 75 consecutive patients, with retrospective analysis of a subgroup of 45 patients who underwent HAR with complicated acute (n = 10), subacute (n = 7), or chronic (n = 28) type B dissection as the underlying disease. Descriptive statistics were computed for continuous and categoric variables. The interval to death or last follow-up was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Results: The patients were a mean age of 59.9 +/- 10.7 years (median, 59.2; range, 35-78 years). Complete supra-aortic debranching was performed in six (13%) in zone 0 (procedure time, 200 minutes; range, 185-365 minutes) and partial debranching in 39 (87%), comprising 16 (36%) in zone 1 (procedure time, 120 minutes; range, 75-250 minutes) and 23 (51%) in zone 2 (procedure time, 91 minutes; range, 70-210 minutes). Technical success was achieved in 86.7% (39 of 45). Thirty-day mortality was 4.4% (two of 45), with an in-hospital mortality of 11.1% (five of 45) as a result of three additional deaths after days 33, 35, and 111. Comparing HAR for type B dissection after complete debranching in six and partial debranching in 39, the overall in-hospital mortality was 67% (four of six) and 2.6% (one of 39), respectively. After a median follow-up of 20.8 months (range, 0.3-70 months), the overall mortality was 13.3% (six of 45), with Kaplan-Meier survival estimate of 85% at 1 year. Stroke rate was 8.8% (four of 45). Paraplegia developed in one patient (2.2%), with complete recovery after spinal drainage. Cardiac complications occurred in three patients (6.7%), pulmonary complications in 10 (22.2%), and renal insufficiency requiring dialysis developed in five (11%). Retrograde dissection occurred in one patient (2.2%) 14 days after complete debranching and zone 0 thoracic endovascular aortic repair, with fatal outcome. No bypass dysfunction was seen during follow-up. The overall early and late endoleak rates were 27% (12 of 44) and 43% (13 of 30), respectively. Eight patients (18%) required reintervention, with freedom of reintervention in 91% at 1 year and 81% at 2 years. Conclusions: HAR in zone 1 and 2 appears a viable alternative to conventional aortic arch surgery in patients with complicated type B dissection. Stroke and endoleaks remain complications that need to be addressed. Treatment of type B aortic dissection with complete supra-aortic debranching and thoracic endovascular aortic repair in zone 0, however, is associated with high mortality, which might be reduced by improved technology using branched stent grafts.