Tc-99(m)-DMSA renal scintigraphy for acute pyelonephritis in adults: Planar and/or SPET imaging?

被引:0
|
作者
Everaert, H
Flamen, P
Franken, PR
Peeters, P
Bossuyt, A
Piepsz, A
机构
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
A number of authors have indicated a more sensitive detection of renal cortical defects using single photon emission tomography (SPET) compared with planar imaging when performing Tc-99(m)-dimercaptosuccinic acid (Tc-99(m)-DMSA) renal scintigraphy. The place of SPET in the evaluation of kidneys in adults suspected of acute pyelonephritis (APN) remains controversial, however. The aim of this study was to address the role of SPET in adult patients suspected of having APN. Planar and SPET Tc-99(m)-DMSA. renal imaging was performed in 53 patients. The data sets were separated and presented in random order to three independent observers. The kidneys wore divided into three segments, which were classified as normal, definitely abnormal or equivocal. In a second step, the number of lesions (definite or equivocal) on planar and SPET imaging were counted. The overall concordance between the planar and SPET imaging scores was 90.9, 89.9 and 87.7% for the three observers, respectively. Interobserver discordance was recorded in a small percentage of both planar and SPET images. The number of lesions, based on the average of the three observers, was 22 for planar and 25 for SPET imaging. Obvious differences between observers were noted. The planar images were more often interpreted as equivocal by the least experienced observer. The more experienced observers gained limited additional information using SPET routinely. Most equivocal lesions on the planar scintigrams were observed in the lower segment. For SPET, no such distribution was noted. High-quality Tc-99(m)-DMSA images allow the detection of the same number of lesions as SPET in adults suspected of APN.
引用
收藏
页码:884 / 889
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Renal Tc-99(m)-DMSA SPET and planar imaging are they really the same? Are they really the same?
    Rodriguez, JL
    Perera, A
    Fraxedas, R
    Reyes, L
    Hernandez, A
    Solano, ME
    NUCLEAR MEDICINE COMMUNICATIONS, 1997, 18 (06) : 556 - 561
  • [2] TC-99(M)-DMSA SPET - TOOL OR TOY
    BUSCOMBE, JR
    HILSON, AJW
    NUCLEAR MEDICINE COMMUNICATIONS, 1994, 15 (10) : 779 - 780
  • [3] REPLACING TC-99(M)-DMSA FOR RENAL IMAGING
    PIEPSZ, A
    PINTELON, H
    VERBOVEN, M
    KEUPPENS, F
    JACOBS, A
    NUCLEAR MEDICINE COMMUNICATIONS, 1992, 13 (07) : 494 - 496
  • [4] COMPARISON OF TC-99M DMSA KIDNEY TOMOGRAPHY WITH PLANAR SCINTIGRAPHY IN ACUTE PYELONEPHRITIS
    MARTIN, P
    DELCORDE, A
    HALL, M
    VERHAS, M
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 1992, 19 (08): : 723 - 723
  • [5] Renal Doppler ultrasound in acute pyelonephritis: Comparison with Tc-99m DMSA scintigraphy
    Rossier, PP
    Khan, HG
    Terrier, F
    Jequier, S
    Slosman, DO
    RADIOLOGY, 1998, 209P : 249 - 249
  • [6] Acute pyelonephritis in adults: Comparison between DMSA-Tc-99m scintigraphy and computed tomography
    Moretti, JL
    Tamgac, F
    Baillet, G
    Weinmann, P
    Krief, S
    Rocchisani, JM
    Buchet, P
    Meyrier, A
    MEDECINE NUCLEAIRE-IMAGERIE FONCTIONNELLE ET METABOLIQUE, 1997, 21 (02): : 72 - 76
  • [7] An analysis of motion correction for Tc-99(m) DMSA renal imaging in paediatrics
    Meadows, A.
    Hogg, P.
    RADIOGRAPHY, 2007, 13 (02) : 109 - 121
  • [8] Comparison of Diagnostic performance of Tc-99m DMSA Renal Planar versus SPECT Imaging in Evalution of Acute Pyelonephritis in Pediatrics
    Moon, E.
    Kim, M.
    Park, S.
    Kim, J.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGING, 2014, 41 : S574 - S574
  • [9] DIAGNOSIS OF ACUTE PYELONEPHRITIS IN CHILDREN - COMPARISON OF SONOGRAPHY AND TC-99M-DMSA SCINTIGRAPHY
    BJORGVINSSON, E
    MAJD, M
    EGGLI, KD
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1991, 157 (03) : 539 - 543
  • [10] SPET IMAGING OF INTRACRANIAL TUMORS WITH TC-99(M)-SESTAMIBI
    BAGNI, B
    PINNA, L
    TAMAROZZI, R
    CATTARUZZI, E
    MARZOLA, MC
    BAGNI, I
    CERUTI, S
    VALENTINI, A
    ZANASI, A
    MAVILLA, L
    GUERRA, PU
    MERLI, AG
    NUCLEAR MEDICINE COMMUNICATIONS, 1995, 16 (04) : 258 - 264