Proactive Control Processes in Event-Based Prospective Memory: Evidence From Intraindividual Variability and Ex-Gaussian Analyses

被引:21
|
作者
Ball, B. Hunter [1 ]
Brewer, Gene A. [2 ]
机构
[1] Washington Univ, Dept Psychol & Brain Sci, CB 1125,1 Brookings Dr, St Louis, MO 63130 USA
[2] Arizona State Univ, Dept Psychol, Tempe, AZ 85287 USA
关键词
prospective memory; proactive control; attention; ex-Gaussian function; intraindividual variability; RESPONSE-TIME DISTRIBUTIONS; DIFFUSION-MODEL ANALYSIS; COGNITIVE CONTROL; WORKING-MEMORY; OLDER-ADULTS; RETRIEVAL-PROCESSES; INDIVIDUAL-DIFFERENCES; ONGOING TASK; EXECUTIVE CONTROL; ATTENTION TASKS;
D O I
10.1037/xlm0000489
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
The present study implemented an individual differences approach in conjunction with response time (RT) variability and distribution modeling techniques to better characterize the cognitive control dynamics underlying ongoing task cost (i.e., slowing) and cue detection in event-based prospective memory (PM). Three experiments assessed the relation between proactive control ability, ex-Gaussian parameter estimates (mu and tau), intraindividual variability in responding (coefficient of variation, CoV), and PM cue detection. Experiment 1 examined these relations using a standard nonfocal PM paradigm. Experiments 2 and 3 further assessed how PM importance and PM cue focality, respectively, influenced performance. Across all experiments, nonfocal PM was associated with increases in all cost measures, but only mu reliably predicted cue detection. Importance instructions and focal PM cues selectively increased and decreased mu cost, respectively, relative to the standard nonfocal condition. These findings suggest that mu cost may reflect a target-checking process that benefits cue detection and produces slowing throughout the entire ongoing task. Additionally, across all experiments proactive control was positively associated with mu cost and cue detection, and generally negatively associated with variability cost (tau and CoV). These findings suggest that natural variation in proactive control ability may affect reliance on more efficacious monitoring processes that facilitates cue detection. Furthermore, variability in responding may have little influence on successful PM. The results from the current study highlight the utility of RT variability and distribution analyses in understanding PM costs and have important implications for extant theories of PM concerning the cognitive control processes underlying cue detection.
引用
收藏
页码:793 / 811
页数:19
相关论文
共 22 条
  • [1] Fitting an ex-Gaussian function to examine costs in event-based prospective memory: Evidence for a continuous monitoring profile
    Loft, Shayne
    Bowden, Vanessa K.
    Ball, B. Hunter
    Brewer, Gene A.
    ACTA PSYCHOLOGICA, 2014, 152 : 177 - 182
  • [2] Racing to Remember: A Theory of Decision Control in Event-Based Prospective Memory
    Strickland, Luke
    Loft, Shayne
    Remington, Roger W.
    Heathcote, Andrew
    PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW, 2018, 125 (06) : 851 - 887
  • [3] Characterising monitoring processes in event-based prospective memory: Evidence from pupillometry
    Moyes, Joseph
    Sari-Sarraf, Nadia
    Gilbert, Sam J.
    COGNITION, 2019, 184 : 83 - 95
  • [4] Event-based prospective memory across the lifespan: Do all age groups benefit from salient prospective memory cues?
    Kretschmer-Trendowicz, Anett
    Altgassen, Mareike
    COGNITIVE DEVELOPMENT, 2016, 39 : 103 - 112
  • [5] Bilingualism enhances attentional control in non-verbal conflict tasks - evidence from ex-Gaussian analyses
    Zhou, Beinan
    Krott, Andrea
    BILINGUALISM-LANGUAGE AND COGNITION, 2018, 21 (01) : 162 - 180
  • [6] Is Event-Based Prospective Memory Resistant to Proactive Interference?
    Joyce M. Oates
    Zehra F. Peynircioğlu
    Kathryn B. Bates
    Current Psychology, 2016, 35 : 632 - 637
  • [7] Is Event-Based Prospective Memory Resistant to Proactive Interference?
    Oates, Joyce M.
    Peynircioglu, Zehra F.
    Bates, Kathryn B.
    CURRENT PSYCHOLOGY, 2016, 35 (04) : 632 - 637
  • [8] Individual differences in event-based prospective memory: Evidence for multiple processes supporting cue detection
    Brewer, Gene A.
    Knight, Justin B.
    Marsh, Richard L.
    Unsworth, Nash
    MEMORY & COGNITION, 2010, 38 (03) : 304 - 311
  • [9] Event-Based Prospective Memory Is Resistant but Not Immune to Proactive Interference
    Oates, Joyce M.
    Peynircioglu, Zehra F.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 2016, 129 (04) : 419 - 427
  • [10] Individual differences in event-based prospective memory: Evidence for multiple processes supporting cue detection
    Gene A. Brewer
    Justin B. Knight
    Richard L. Marsh
    Nash Unsworth
    Memory & Cognition, 2010, 38 : 304 - 311