Indications for Pediatric External Ventricular Drain Placement and Risk Factors for Conversion to a Ventriculoperitoneal Shunt

被引:20
|
作者
Walker, Corey T. [1 ]
Stone, Jonathan J. [1 ]
Jacobson, Max [1 ]
Phillips, Valerie [1 ]
Silberstein, Howard J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Rochester, Med Ctr, Dept Neurol Surg, Rochester, NY 14642 USA
关键词
Cerebrospinal fluid diversion; External ventricular drain; Hydrocephalus; Intracranial pressure; Trauma; Ventriculoperitoneal shunt; Ventriculostomy; ANEURYSMAL SUBARACHNOID HEMORRHAGE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; UNITED-STATES; BRAIN-TUMORS; HYDROCEPHALUS; CHILDREN;
D O I
10.1159/000353608
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background/Aims: The external ventricular drain (EVD) is commonly used for the treatment of hydrocephalus and intracranial pressure (ICP) monitoring. In this study, we retrospectively reviewed indications for EVD placement over the last 20 years in pediatric patients at our institution. Additionally, we evaluated the rate that an EVD needed to be converted to a ventriculoperitoneal shunt (VPS) and ascertained how hydrocephalus etiology impacted long-term drainage requirements. Methods: Patients that received an EVD between 1990 and 2010 at our institution were identified using billing codes. Demographics, etiology of hydrocephalus, length of stay (LOS) and EVD duration were recorded. Only patients receiving their first EVD were included; those with any prior ventricular catheter (including prior shunts) were excluded from this study. Results: A total of 180 patients underwent first-time placement of an EVD over the 20-year period. Of these, 78.9% were placed on the right side and 81.7% were performed through a frontal burr hole site. The average age of all patients at their initial procedure was 9.3 years (median 9.8; range 0-18), hospital LOS was 22.5 days (median 16; range 1-174) and EVD duration was 7.8 days (median 7; range 1-37). Trauma (43.3%) and neoplasms (32.2%) were the most common indications. Approximately, one quarter of the patients were unable to become EVD independent and, therefore, required a VPS. Only patients receiving an EVD for traumatic brain injury were significantly less likely to be converted to a shunt than other causes of hydrocephalus (relative risk, RR = 0.18, 95% confidence interval, CI = 0.07-0.46). Conversely, patients with neoplasms (RR = 3.56, 95% CI = 1.74-7.31), obstructive hydrocephalus (RR = 5.48, 95% CI = 1.37-22.0) and intraventricular hemorrhage (RR = 9.86, 95% CI = 1.05-92.3) were more likely to need a shunt. Conclusion: Traumatic brain injuries and neoplasms represent the most common indications for EVD placement in the pediatric population. While patients with neoplasm were much more likely to need conversion to a VPS for long-term cerebrospinal fluid diversion, the majority of EVDs in patients with head injuries were successfully weaned. Copyright (C) 2013 S. Karger AG, Basel
引用
收藏
页码:342 / 347
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Choice of valve type and poor ventricular catheter placement: Modifiable factors associated with ventriculoperitoneal shunt failure
    Jeremiah, Kealeboga Josephine
    Cherry, Catherine Louise
    Wan, Kai Rui
    Toy, Jennifer Ah
    Wolfe, Rory
    Danks, Robert Andrew
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NEUROSCIENCE, 2016, 27 : 95 - 98
  • [22] Placement of External Ventricular Drain: Comparison of Two Methods
    Bender, Michael
    Schwarm, Frank
    Stein, Marco
    Uhl, Eberhard
    Reinges, Marcus H. T.
    JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGICAL SURGERY PART A-CENTRAL EUROPEAN NEUROSURGERY, 2019, 80 (02) : 116 - 121
  • [23] Determinants of accuracy of freehand external ventricular drain placement by neurosurgical trainees
    Pishjoo, Masoud
    Khatibi, Kasra
    Etemadrezaie, Hamid
    Zabihyan, Samira
    Ganjeifar, Babak
    Safdari, Mohammad
    Baharvahdat, Humain
    ACTA NEUROCHIRURGICA, 2021, 163 (04) : 1113 - 1119
  • [24] Timing of Permanent Ventricular Shunt Placement Following External Ventricular Drain Placement in Primary Intracerebral Hemorrhage
    Peters, Steven Ray
    Tirschwell, David
    JOURNAL OF STROKE & CEREBROVASCULAR DISEASES, 2017, 26 (10): : 2120 - 2127
  • [25] Risk factors associated with distal catheter migration following ventriculoperitoneal shunt placement
    Abode-Iyamah, Kingsley O.
    Khanna, Ryan
    Rasmussen, Zachary D.
    Flouty, Oliver
    Dandaleh, Nader S.
    Greenlee, Jeremy
    Howard, Matthew A., III
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NEUROSCIENCE, 2016, 25 : 46 - 49
  • [26] Associations between Features of External Ventricular Drain Management, Disposition, and Shunt Dependence
    Engel, Corey
    Faulkner, Amanda L.
    Van Wyck, David W.
    Zomorodi, Ali R.
    King, Nicolas K. Kam
    Taylor, Rachel A. Williamson
    Hailey, Claire E.
    Umeano, Odera A.
    McDonagh, David L.
    Li, Yi-Ju
    James, Michael L.
    JOURNAL OF NEUROANAESTHESIOLOGY AND CRITICAL CARE, 2021, 08 (01) : 28 - 33
  • [27] Analysis of factors affecting ventriculoperitoneal shunt survival in pediatric patients
    Farid Khan
    Muhammad Shahzad Shamim
    Abdul Rehman
    Muhammad Ehsan Bari
    Child's Nervous System, 2013, 29 : 791 - 802
  • [28] Electromagnetic stereotactic navigation for external ventricular drain placement in the intensive care unit
    Mahan, Mark
    Spetzler, Robert F.
    Nakaji, Peter
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NEUROSCIENCE, 2013, 20 (12) : 1718 - 1722
  • [29] Ventriculoperitoneal Shunting for Glioblastoma: Risk Factors, Indications, and Efficacy
    Castro, Brandyn A.
    Imber, Brandon S.
    Chen, Rebecca
    McDermott, Michael W.
    Aghi, Manish K.
    NEUROSURGERY, 2017, 80 (03) : 421 - 430
  • [30] Updates on techniques and technology to optimize external ventricular drain placement: A review of the literature
    Ofoma, Hiest
    Cheaney, Barry, II
    Brown, Nolan J.
    Lien, Brian, V
    Himstead, Alexander S.
    Choi, Elliot H.
    Cohn, Sebastian
    Campos, Jessica K.
    Oh, Michael Y.
    CLINICAL NEUROLOGY AND NEUROSURGERY, 2022, 213