Simulation of groundwater level variations using wavelet combined with neural network, linear regression and support vector machine

被引:131
作者
Ebrahimi, Hadi [1 ]
Rajaee, Taher [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Qom, Dept Civil Engn, Qom, Iran
关键词
Time delay neural networks; Wavelet; Iran; Multi linear regression; Groundwater level; Support vector machine; PREDICTION; MODEL;
D O I
10.1016/j.gloplacha.2016.11.014
中图分类号
P9 [自然地理学];
学科分类号
0705 ; 070501 ;
摘要
Simulation of groundwater level (GWL) fluctuations is an important task in management of groundwater resources. In this study, the effect of wavelet analysis on the training of the artificial neural network (ANN), multi linear regression (MLR) and support vector regression (SVR) approaches was investigated, and the ANN, MLR and SVR along with the wavelet-ANN (WNN), wavelet-MLR (WLR) and wavelet-SVR (WSVR) models were compared in simulating one-month-ahead of GWL. The only variable used to develop the models was the monthly GWL data recorded over a period of 11 years from two wells in the Qom plain, Iran. The results showed that decomposing GWL time series into several sub-time series, extremely improved the training of the models. For both wells 1 and 2, the Meyer and Db5 wavelets produced better results compared to the other wavelets; which indicated wavelet types had similar behavior in similar case studies. The optimal number of delays was 6 months, which seems to be due to natural phenomena. The best WNN model, using Meyer mother wavelet with two decomposition levels, simulated one-month-ahead with RMSE values being equal to 0.069 in and 0.154 m for wells 1 and 2, respectively. The RMSE values for the WLR model were 0.058 m and 0.111 m, and for WSVR model were 0.136 in and 0.060 in for wells 1 and 2, respectively. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:181 / 191
页数:11
相关论文
共 36 条
[1]   A wavelet neural network conjunction model for groundwater level forecasting [J].
Adamowski, Jan ;
Chan, Hiu Fung .
JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 2011, 407 (1-4) :28-40
[2]  
Adhikary S., 2012, International Journal of Applied Science and Engineering Research, V1, P238
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1981, STAT METHODS
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2010, NEURAL NETWORK TOOLB
[5]   Interpretation of Water Level Changes in the High Plains Aquifer in Western Kansas [J].
Butler, J. J., Jr. ;
Stotler, R. L. ;
Whittemore, D. O. ;
Reboulet, E. C. .
GROUND WATER, 2013, 51 (02) :180-190
[6]   Prediction of monthly regional groundwater levels through hybrid soft-computing techniques [J].
Chang, Fi-John ;
Chang, Li-Chiu ;
Huang, Chien-Wei ;
Kao, I-Feng .
JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 2016, 541 :965-976
[7]   Wavelets: The mathematical background [J].
Cohen, A ;
Kovacevic, J .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE IEEE, 1996, 84 (04) :514-522
[8]   Groundwater level forecasting using artificial neural networks [J].
Daliakopoulos, IN ;
Coulibaly, P ;
Tsanis, IK .
JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 2005, 309 (1-4) :229-240
[9]  
Daubechies I., 1990, IEEE T INFORM THEORY, V36, P5
[10]   Constraints of artificial neural networks for rainfall-runoff modelling: trade-offs in hydrological state representation and model evaluation [J].
de Vos, NJ ;
Rientjes, THM .
HYDROLOGY AND EARTH SYSTEM SCIENCES, 2005, 9 (1-2) :111-126