Public Restroom Habits in Patients After Artificial Urinary Sphincter Implantation

被引:3
作者
Bukavina, Laura
Chaparala, Hemant
Kartha, Ganesh
Angermeier, Kenneth
Montague, Drogo
Wood, Hadley
机构
[1] Johns Hopkins Bloomberg Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Epidemiol, Baltimore, MD USA
[2] Cleveland Clin, Glickman Urol & Kidney Inst, Dept Urol, Cleveland, OH 44195 USA
[3] Case Western Reserve Univ, Sch Med, Cleveland, OH USA
关键词
QUALITY-OF-LIFE; PROSTATE-CANCER; INCONTINENCE; VALIDATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.urology.2015.03.027
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE To investigate public restroom habits with secondary outcomes evaluating health-related quality of life (HRQoL) outcomes in our patients who underwent artificial urinary sphincter (AUS) implantation after prostatectomy. Postprostatectomy incontinence is a significant burden on patients' emotional health and ability to perform activities of daily living. METHODS Between June 2012 and January 2014, we identified 50 men who had undergone AUS placement for postprostatectomy incontinence. All 50 men completed baseline Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite-Urinary Domain (EPIC-UD) and Urogenital Distress Inventory Short Form (UDI-6) questionnaires preoperatively. We evaluated patients' subjective postoperative continence status using the UDI-6 and EPIC-UD scales via a telephone-administered questionnaire. RESULTS Thirty-one of 50 patients (62%) were contacted and agreed to participate in the study. The pad score decreased significantly from 3 (median = 3 pads per day [ppd]; interquartile range [IQR] = 2) during minimal activity before surgery to 1 (median = 1.0 ppd; IQR = 0.5) after surgery (P <. 001), and from 5 pads (median = 5 ppd; IQR = 5) during strenuous activity to 1 pad (median = 1 ppd; IQR = 2; P <. 001). QoL analysis pre- and post-AUS revealed a score increase of 16.5 points (P <. 007) in EPIC-UD and an increase of 23.93 (P <. 022) in UDI-6. Men reporting lower ppd before AUS placement were more likely to report higher public restroom urinal use (R = 0.366; P <. 043) and increased public restroom comfort level (R = 0.342; P <. 060) as compared with men with higher preoperative ppd usage. CONCLUSION EPIC-UD and UDI-6 scores improved significantly and demonstrated high levels of correlation to self-reported ppd; however, both failed to show any correlation to patients' comfort level with public restrooms. The single predictor of patients' comfort was self-reported ppd with minimal activity. (C) 2015 Elsevier Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:171 / 175
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] The impact of perioperative complications on favorable outcomes after artificial urinary sphincter implantation for post-prostatectomy incontinence
    Kretschmer, Alexander
    Huesch, Tanja
    Anding, Ralf
    Pottek, Tobias
    Rose, Achim
    Struss, Werner
    Queissert, Fabian
    Naumann, Carsten M.
    Nyarangi-Dix, Joanne N.
    Brehmer, Bernhard
    Haferkamp, Axel
    Bauer, Ricarda M.
    INTERNATIONAL BRAZ J UROL, 2020, 46 (04): : 632 - 639
  • [42] Intermediate outcomes after transcorporal placement of an artificial urinary sphincter
    Lee, Dominic
    Zafirakis, Helen
    Shapiro, Andrew
    Westney, O. Lenaine
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2012, 19 (09) : 861 - 866
  • [43] Artificial Bowel Sphincter Implantation for Faecal Incontinence in Asian Patients
    Chittawatanarat, Kaweesak
    Koh, Dean C.
    Seah, Aileen A.
    Cheong, Wai-Kit
    Tsang, Charles B.
    ASIAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2010, 33 (03) : 134 - 142
  • [44] Urethral pressure profile assessment after artificial urinary sphincter implantation (FlowSecure™ and AMS-800™): A case series
    Haab, Alexander C.
    Tornic, Lure
    John, Hubert A.
    SAGE OPEN MEDICAL CASE REPORTS, 2019, 7
  • [45] Comparison of quality of life and anorectal function after artificial sphincter implantation
    Lehur, PA
    Zerbib, F
    Neunlist, M
    Glemain, P
    des Varannes, SB
    DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2002, 45 (04) : 508 - 513
  • [46] A new approach to laparoscopic implantation of the artificial urinary sphincter: Vesicovaginal approach to the bladder neck
    Ruiz-Hernandez, M.
    Lopez-Fando, L.
    Gomez de Vicente, J. M.
    Jimenez-Cidre, M. A.
    Sanchez-Gallego, M. D.
    Lorca-Alvaro, J.
    Diaz-Perez, D.
    Burgos-Revilla, F. J.
    ACTAS UROLOGICAS ESPANOLAS, 2019, 43 (01): : 44 - 50
  • [47] Revisiting the penoscrotal approach to artificial urinary sphincter surgery: how does it compare to a perineal incision for initial implantation?
    Staniorski, Christopher J.
    Singal, Ashima
    Nettey, Oluwarotimi
    Yura, Emily
    Keeter, Mary Kate
    Kielb, Stephanie
    Hofer, Matthias D.
    WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2021, 39 (03) : 871 - 876
  • [48] The Surgical Learning Curve of Artificial Urinary Sphincter Implantation: Implications for Prosthetic Training and Referral
    Lai, H. Henry
    Boone, Timothy B.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2013, 189 (04) : 1437 - 1442
  • [49] The Role of Educational Level and Cognitive Status in Men Undergoing Artificial Urinary Sphincter Implantation
    Keles, Ahmet
    Onur, Rahmi
    Aydos, Murat
    Dincer, Murat
    Koca, Orhan
    Coskun, Burhan
    Imamoglu, Abdurrahim
    Karakeci, Ahmet
    UROLOGY, 2021, 147 : 243 - 248