Public Restroom Habits in Patients After Artificial Urinary Sphincter Implantation

被引:3
作者
Bukavina, Laura
Chaparala, Hemant
Kartha, Ganesh
Angermeier, Kenneth
Montague, Drogo
Wood, Hadley
机构
[1] Johns Hopkins Bloomberg Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Epidemiol, Baltimore, MD USA
[2] Cleveland Clin, Glickman Urol & Kidney Inst, Dept Urol, Cleveland, OH 44195 USA
[3] Case Western Reserve Univ, Sch Med, Cleveland, OH USA
关键词
QUALITY-OF-LIFE; PROSTATE-CANCER; INCONTINENCE; VALIDATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.urology.2015.03.027
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE To investigate public restroom habits with secondary outcomes evaluating health-related quality of life (HRQoL) outcomes in our patients who underwent artificial urinary sphincter (AUS) implantation after prostatectomy. Postprostatectomy incontinence is a significant burden on patients' emotional health and ability to perform activities of daily living. METHODS Between June 2012 and January 2014, we identified 50 men who had undergone AUS placement for postprostatectomy incontinence. All 50 men completed baseline Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite-Urinary Domain (EPIC-UD) and Urogenital Distress Inventory Short Form (UDI-6) questionnaires preoperatively. We evaluated patients' subjective postoperative continence status using the UDI-6 and EPIC-UD scales via a telephone-administered questionnaire. RESULTS Thirty-one of 50 patients (62%) were contacted and agreed to participate in the study. The pad score decreased significantly from 3 (median = 3 pads per day [ppd]; interquartile range [IQR] = 2) during minimal activity before surgery to 1 (median = 1.0 ppd; IQR = 0.5) after surgery (P <. 001), and from 5 pads (median = 5 ppd; IQR = 5) during strenuous activity to 1 pad (median = 1 ppd; IQR = 2; P <. 001). QoL analysis pre- and post-AUS revealed a score increase of 16.5 points (P <. 007) in EPIC-UD and an increase of 23.93 (P <. 022) in UDI-6. Men reporting lower ppd before AUS placement were more likely to report higher public restroom urinal use (R = 0.366; P <. 043) and increased public restroom comfort level (R = 0.342; P <. 060) as compared with men with higher preoperative ppd usage. CONCLUSION EPIC-UD and UDI-6 scores improved significantly and demonstrated high levels of correlation to self-reported ppd; however, both failed to show any correlation to patients' comfort level with public restrooms. The single predictor of patients' comfort was self-reported ppd with minimal activity. (C) 2015 Elsevier Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:171 / 175
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] SYNCHRONOUS PENOSCROTAL IMPLANTATION OF PENILE PROSTHESIS AND ARTIFICIAL URINARY SPHINCTER AFTER RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY
    Bolat, Deniz
    Kozacioglu, Zafer
    Polat, Salih
    Koras, Omer
    Arslan, Murat
    Minareci, Suleyman
    ARCHIVOS ESPANOLES DE UROLOGIA, 2017, 70 (03): : 367 - 372
  • [22] Impact of previous urethroplasty on the outcome after artificial urinary sphincter implantation: a prospective evaluation
    Sayedahmed, Khalid
    Olianas, Roberto
    Kaftan, Bjoern
    Omar, Mohamed
    El Shazly, Mohamed
    Burger, Maximilian
    Mayr, Roman
    Rosenhammer, Bernd
    WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2020, 38 (01) : 183 - 191
  • [23] Artificial urinary sphincter implantation after transperineal open reconstruction of post-prostatectomy vesicourethral anastomotic stenosis
    Marks, Phillip
    Dahlem, Roland
    Fisch, Margit
    Schuettfort, Victor M.
    Vetterlein, Malte W.
    Filipas, Dejan K.
    Ludwig, Tim A.
    AGING MALE, 2025, 28 (01)
  • [24] Long-term functional outcomes after artificial urinary sphincter implantation in men with stress urinary incontinence
    Leon, Priscilla
    Chartier-Kastler, Emmanuel
    Roupret, Morgan
    Ambrogi, Vanina
    Mozer, Pierre
    Phe, Veronique
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2015, 115 (06) : 951 - 957
  • [25] Timing Considerations for Artificial Urinary Sphincter Implantation Postpelvic Radiotherapy
    Malshy, Kamil
    Marthi, Siddharth
    Ortiz, Rebecca
    Nicaise, Edouard
    Golijanin, Borivoj
    Miller, Kennon
    Hartsell, Lindsey
    Cancian, Madeline
    UROLOGY, 2024, 193 : 214 - 219
  • [26] Artificial urinary sphincter implantation with periprostatic cuff placement for urinary incontinence in men
    Szopinski, Tomasz
    Sudol-Szopinska, Iwona
    Czech, Anna K.
    Gasowski, Jerzy
    Chlosta, Piotr L.
    ARCHIVES OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2022, 18 (05) : 1279 - 1285
  • [27] Transcorporal vs. bulbar artificial urinary sphincter implantation in male patients with fragile urethra
    El-Akri, Mehdi
    Bentellis, Imad
    Tricard, Thibault
    Brierre, Thibaut
    Cousin, Tiffany
    Dupuis, Hugo
    Hermieu, Nicolas
    Gaillard, Victor
    Poussot, Baptiste
    Robin, Damien
    Pitout, Alice
    Beraud, Florian
    Bertrand-Leon, Priscilla
    Chevallier, Daniel
    Bruyere, Franck
    Biardeau, Xavier
    Monsaint, Herve
    Corbel, Luc
    Saussine, Christian
    Hermieu, Jean-Francois
    Lecoanet, Pierre
    Capon, Gregoire
    Cornu, Jean-Nicolas
    Game, Xavier
    Ruffion, Alain
    Peyronnet, Benoit
    WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2021, 39 (12) : 4449 - 4457
  • [28] Inguinal hernia repair in patients with artificial urinary sphincter after radical prostatectomy
    Yatabe, Y.
    Tanioka, T.
    Waseda, Y.
    Yamaguchi, K.
    Ogo, T.
    Fujiwara, H.
    Okuno, K.
    Kawada, K.
    Haruki, S.
    Tokunaga, M.
    Fujii, Y.
    Kinugasa, Y.
    HERNIA, 2024, 28 (04) : 1331 - 1336
  • [29] Urethral pressure profilometry in artificial urinary sphincter implantation: A case report
    Meng, Ling-Feng
    Liu, Xiao-Dong
    Wang, Miao
    Zhang, Wei
    Zhang, Yao-Guang
    WORLD JOURNAL OF CLINICAL CASES, 2019, 7 (23) : 4084 - 4090
  • [30] Comparison of penoscrotal and perineal approaches for implantation of an artificial urinary sphincter in man
    Brierre, T.
    Roumiguie, M.
    Soulie, M.
    Rischmann, P.
    Thoulouzan, M.
    Game, X.
    PROGRES EN UROLOGIE, 2021, 31 (17): : 1182 - 1191