Public Restroom Habits in Patients After Artificial Urinary Sphincter Implantation

被引:3
作者
Bukavina, Laura
Chaparala, Hemant
Kartha, Ganesh
Angermeier, Kenneth
Montague, Drogo
Wood, Hadley
机构
[1] Johns Hopkins Bloomberg Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Epidemiol, Baltimore, MD USA
[2] Cleveland Clin, Glickman Urol & Kidney Inst, Dept Urol, Cleveland, OH 44195 USA
[3] Case Western Reserve Univ, Sch Med, Cleveland, OH USA
关键词
QUALITY-OF-LIFE; PROSTATE-CANCER; INCONTINENCE; VALIDATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.urology.2015.03.027
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE To investigate public restroom habits with secondary outcomes evaluating health-related quality of life (HRQoL) outcomes in our patients who underwent artificial urinary sphincter (AUS) implantation after prostatectomy. Postprostatectomy incontinence is a significant burden on patients' emotional health and ability to perform activities of daily living. METHODS Between June 2012 and January 2014, we identified 50 men who had undergone AUS placement for postprostatectomy incontinence. All 50 men completed baseline Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite-Urinary Domain (EPIC-UD) and Urogenital Distress Inventory Short Form (UDI-6) questionnaires preoperatively. We evaluated patients' subjective postoperative continence status using the UDI-6 and EPIC-UD scales via a telephone-administered questionnaire. RESULTS Thirty-one of 50 patients (62%) were contacted and agreed to participate in the study. The pad score decreased significantly from 3 (median = 3 pads per day [ppd]; interquartile range [IQR] = 2) during minimal activity before surgery to 1 (median = 1.0 ppd; IQR = 0.5) after surgery (P <. 001), and from 5 pads (median = 5 ppd; IQR = 5) during strenuous activity to 1 pad (median = 1 ppd; IQR = 2; P <. 001). QoL analysis pre- and post-AUS revealed a score increase of 16.5 points (P <. 007) in EPIC-UD and an increase of 23.93 (P <. 022) in UDI-6. Men reporting lower ppd before AUS placement were more likely to report higher public restroom urinal use (R = 0.366; P <. 043) and increased public restroom comfort level (R = 0.342; P <. 060) as compared with men with higher preoperative ppd usage. CONCLUSION EPIC-UD and UDI-6 scores improved significantly and demonstrated high levels of correlation to self-reported ppd; however, both failed to show any correlation to patients' comfort level with public restrooms. The single predictor of patients' comfort was self-reported ppd with minimal activity. (C) 2015 Elsevier Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:171 / 175
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Complications after artificial urinary sphincter implantation in patients with or without prior radiotherapy
    Ravier, Emmanuel
    Fassi-Fehri, Hakim
    Crouzet, Sebastien
    Gelet, Albert
    Abid, Nadia
    Martin, Xavier
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2015, 115 (02) : 300 - 307
  • [2] A national study of artificial urinary sphincter and male sling implantation after radical prostatectomy in England
    Dosanjh, Amandeep
    Baldwin, Simon
    Mytton, Jemma
    King, Dominic
    Trudgill, Nigel
    Belal, Mohammed
    Patel, Prashant
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2020, 125 (03) : 467 - 475
  • [3] Longitudinal changes in patient-reported outcomes after artificial urinary sphincter implantation
    Yokoyama, Minato
    Masuda, Hitoshi
    Ito, Masaya
    Waseda, Yuma
    Moriyama, Shingo
    Toide, Masahiro
    Uchida, Yusuke
    Uehara, Sho
    Kijima, Toshiki
    Yoshida, Soichiro
    Ishioka, Junichiro
    Matsuoka, Yoh
    Saito, Kazutaka
    Fujii, Yasuhisa
    LUTS-LOWER URINARY TRACT SYMPTOMS, 2020, 12 (03) : 240 - 244
  • [4] Radiologic feature of complications after artificial urinary sphincter implantation following total prostatectomy
    Oda, Shioto
    Kuno, Hirofumi
    Hiyama, Takashi
    Yamaguchi, Masayuki
    Sasaki, Tomoaki
    Yajima, Shugo
    Masuda, Hitoshi
    Kobayashi, Tatsushi
    ABDOMINAL RADIOLOGY, 2024, 49 (07) : 2416 - 2427
  • [5] Using a stress reservoir to improve urine leakage after artificial urinary sphincter implantation
    Ameli, Ghazal
    Weibl, Peter
    Rutkowski, Michael
    Huebner, Wilhelm Alexander
    INTERNATIONAL UROLOGY AND NEPHROLOGY, 2023, 55 (12) : 3089 - 3094
  • [6] Continence and quality of life assessment after artificial urinary sphincter implantation
    Gnessin, E
    Livne, PM
    Baniel, J
    Gillon, G
    ISRAEL MEDICAL ASSOCIATION JOURNAL, 2004, 6 (10): : 592 - 594
  • [7] Urethral atrophy after implantation of an artificial urinary sphincter: fact or fiction?
    Bugeja, Simon
    Ivaz, Stella L.
    Frost, Anastasia
    Andrich, Daniela E.
    Mundy, Anthony R.
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2016, 117 (04) : 669 - 676
  • [8] Patients' quality of life after implantation of ZSI 375 artificial urinary sphincter due to stress urinary incontinence
    Ostrowski, Ireneusz
    Sledz, Emil
    Wilamowski, Jacek
    Jozefczak, Mateusz
    Dys, Wojciech
    Ciechan, Janusz
    Drewa, Tomasz
    Chlosta, Piotr Ludwik
    CENTRAL EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2020, 73 (02) : 178 - 186
  • [9] Impact of radiation therapy on artificial urinary sphincter implantation in male patients: A multicenter study
    Mamane, Jordan
    Sanchez, Stephane
    Lellouch, Alexandre G.
    Gaillard, Victor
    Poussot, Baptiste
    Tricard, Thibault
    Saussine, Christian
    Brierre, Thibaut
    Game, Xavier
    Beraud, Florian
    Biardeau, Xavier
    Bruyere, Franck
    Robin, Damien
    El-Akri, Mehdi
    Chevallier, Daniel
    Durand, Mathieu
    Bentellis, Imad
    Cousin, Tiffany
    Capon, Gregoire
    Cornu, Jean-Nicolas
    Dupuis, Hugo
    Monsaint, Herve
    Corbel, Luc
    Hermieu, Nicolas
    Hermieu, Jean-Francois
    Pitout, Alice
    Lecoanet, Pierre
    Peyronnet, Benoit
    Leon, Priscilla
    NEUROUROLOGY AND URODYNAMICS, 2022, 41 (01) : 332 - 339
  • [10] Artificial urinary sphincter implantation: what do patients and urologists face?
    Simsir, Adnan
    Altintas, Rasit
    Ozyurt, Mehmet Ceyhun
    TURKISH JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCES, 2012, 42 (02) : 229 - 235