Language assessment literacy as self-awareness: Understanding the role of interpretation in assessment and in teacher learning

被引:138
作者
Scarino, Angela [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ S Australia, Adelaide, SA 5001, Australia
关键词
Alternative assessment; language assessment literacy; teacher knowledge; teacher self-awareness; KNOWLEDGE-BASE; FIRTH;
D O I
10.1177/0265532213480128
中图分类号
H0 [语言学];
学科分类号
030303 ; 0501 ; 050102 ;
摘要
The increasing influence of sociocultural theories of learning on assessment practices in second language education necessitates an expansion of the knowledge base that teacher-assessors need to develop (what teachers need to know) and related changes in the processes of language teacher education (how they learn and develop it). Teacher assessors need to acquire concepts from diverse assessment paradigms; they need to learn to use these concepts in developing, using and analysing assessment procedures and results; they need to exercise critical perspectives on their own assessment practices for particular purposes in diverse contexts, especially in seeking to do justice to all in education. In this paper I argue that, to develop language assessment literacy with the dual goals of transforming teacher assessment practices and developing teacher understanding of the phenomenon of assessment itself and themselves as assessors, it is necessary to reconsider both the knowledge base and the complex processes of language teacher education. I draw on projects I have conducted on developing and investigating teacher understanding and practices in second language assessment, to discuss the need to work with the often tacit preconceptions, beliefs, understandings and world-views about assessment that teacher-assessors bring to teacher professional learning programs and that inform their conceptualizations, interpretations, judgments and decisions in assessment. I discuss the need in developing language assessment literacy for processes that develop teacher-assessors' capability to explore and evaluate their own preconceptions so as to become aware of how they interpret their own assessment practices and their students' second language learning. Through these processes they develop a deeper understanding of the interpretive nature of assessment and their own self-awareness as assessors.
引用
收藏
页码:309 / 327
页数:19
相关论文
共 49 条
[21]   Constructing a language assessment knowledge base: A focus on language assessment courses [J].
Inbar-Lourie, Ofra .
LANGUAGE TESTING, 2008, 25 (03) :385-402
[22]  
James M., 2006, ASSESSMENT LEARNING, P47
[23]  
James M, 2006, IMPROV LEARN TLRP, P27
[24]   From communicative competence to symbolic competence [J].
Kramsch, C .
MODERN LANGUAGE JOURNAL, 2006, 90 (02) :249-252
[25]   Extending Firth and Wagner's (1997) ontological perspective to L2 classroom praxis and teacher education [J].
Lantolf, James P. ;
Johnson, Karen E. .
MODERN LANGUAGE JOURNAL, 2007, 91 :877-892
[26]  
MCNAMARA T, 2003, EUROSLA YB, V3, P229, DOI DOI 10.1075/EUROSLA.3.13MCN
[27]   The meaning and consequences of "reliability" [J].
Moss, PA .
JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL AND BEHAVIORAL STATISTICS, 2004, 29 (02) :245-249
[28]   Educational standards, assessment, and the search for consensus [J].
Moss, PA ;
Schutz, A .
AMERICAN EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH JOURNAL, 2001, 38 (01) :37-70
[29]  
Moss Pamela., 1996, EDUC RESEARCHER, V25, P20, DOI [10.3102/0013189X025001020, DOI 10.3102/0013189X025001020]
[30]   Validity in educational assessment [J].
Moss, Pamela A. ;
Girard, Brian J. ;
Haniford, Laura C. .
REVIEW OF RESEARCH IN EDUCATION 30, 2006: RETHINKING LEARNING: WHAT COUNTS AS LEARNING AND WHAT LEARNING COUNTS, 2006, 30 :109-162