Susceptibility to emotional contagion for negative emotions improves detection of smile authenticity

被引:23
作者
Manera, Valeria [1 ,2 ]
Grandi, Elisa [1 ]
Colle, Livia [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Turin, Dept Psychol, Ctr Cognit Sci, I-10123 Turin, Italy
[2] Stanford Univ, Dept Psychol, Stanford Psychophysiol Lab, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
来源
FRONTIERS IN HUMAN NEUROSCIENCE | 2013年 / 7卷
关键词
smile authenticity; emotional contagion; simulation models; individual differences; positive and negative emotions; FACIAL MIMICRY; INDIVIDUAL-DIFFERENCES; DUCHENNE SMILE; RECOGNITION; EMPATHY; ENJOYMENT; PERCEPTION; EXPRESSION; MOOD; CHILDRENS;
D O I
10.3389/fnhum.2013.00006
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
A smile is a context-dependent emotional expression. A smiling face can signal the experience of enjoyable emotions, but people can also smile to convince another person that enjoyment is occurring when it is not. For this reason, the ability to discriminate between felt and faked enjoyment expressions is a crucial social skill. Despite its importance, adults show remarkable individual variation in this ability. Revealing the factors responsible for these huge individual differences is a key challenge in this domain. Here we investigated, on a large sample of participants, whether individual differences in smile authenticity recognition are accounted for by differences in the predisposition to experience other people's emotions, i.e., by susceptibility to emotional contagion. Results showed that susceptibility to emotional contagion for negative emotions increased smile authenticity detection, while susceptibility to emotional contagion for positive emotions worsened detection performance, because it leaded to categorize most of the faked smiles as sincere. These findings suggest that susceptibility to emotional contagion plays a key role in complex emotion recognition, and point out the importance of analyzing the tendency to experience other people's positive and negative emotions as separate abilities.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 62 条
  • [1] Adolphs R, 1996, J NEUROSCI, V16, P7678
  • [2] Perception and emotion: How we recognize facial expressions
    Adolphs, Ralph
    [J]. CURRENT DIRECTIONS IN PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2006, 15 (05) : 222 - 226
  • [3] Adaptive Responses to Social Exclusion: Social Rejection Improves Detection of Real and Fake Smiles
    Bernstein, Michael J.
    Young, Steven G.
    Brown, Christina M.
    Sacco, Donald F.
    Claypool, Heather M.
    [J]. PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2008, 19 (10) : 981 - 983
  • [4] Mimicry and the judgment of emotional facial expressions
    Blairy, S
    Herrera, P
    Hess, U
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NONVERBAL BEHAVIOR, 1999, 23 (01) : 5 - 41
  • [5] Bower G.H., 1991, MOOD CONGRUITY SOCIA, P31
  • [6] Socioemotional selectivity theory and the regulation of emotion in the second half of life
    Carstensen, LL
    Fung, HH
    Charles, ST
    [J]. MOTIVATION AND EMOTION, 2003, 27 (02) : 103 - 123
  • [7] Clore Gerald L., 1994, Handbook of social cognition: Basic processes, P323, DOI DOI 10.4324/9781315807102
  • [8] The emotional brain
    Dalgleish, T
    [J]. NATURE REVIEWS NEUROSCIENCE, 2004, 5 (07) : 583 - 589
  • [9] APPROACH WITHDRAWAL AND CEREBRAL ASYMMETRY - EMOTIONAL EXPRESSION AND BRAIN PHYSIOLOGY .1.
    DAVIDSON, RJ
    SARON, CD
    SENULIS, JA
    EKMAN, P
    FRIESEN, WV
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1990, 58 (02) : 330 - 341
  • [10] MEASURING INDIVIDUAL-DIFFERENCES IN EMPATHY - EVIDENCE FOR A MULTIDIMENSIONAL APPROACH
    DAVIS, MH
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1983, 44 (01) : 113 - 126