Magnetic Field Configuration Models and Reconstruction Methods for Interplanetary Coronal Mass Ejections

被引:65
作者
Al-Haddad, N. [1 ]
Nieves-Chinchilla, T. [2 ,3 ]
Savani, N. P. [4 ,5 ]
Moestl, C. [6 ,7 ,8 ]
Marubashi, K. [9 ]
Hidalgo, M. A. [10 ]
Roussev, I. I. [11 ]
Poedts, S. [1 ]
Farrugia, C. J. [12 ,13 ]
机构
[1] Katholieke Univ Leuven, Ctr Plasma Astrofys, B-3001 Heverlee, Belgium
[2] GSFC NASA, Heliospher Phys Lab, Greenbelt, MD USA
[3] IACS CUA, Washington, DC USA
[4] UCAR, Boulder, CO USA
[5] NASA Goddard Space Flight Ctr, Greenbelt, MD USA
[6] Univ Calif Berkeley, Space Sci Lab, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA
[7] Austrian Acad Sci, Space Res Inst, A-8042 Graz, Austria
[8] Graz Univ, Inst Phys, Kanzelhohe Observ, IGAM, A-8010 Graz, Austria
[9] Korea Astron & Space Sci Inst, Taejon 305348, South Korea
[10] SRG UAH, Madrid, Spain
[11] Univ Hawaii, Inst Astron, Honolulu, HI 96822 USA
[12] Univ New Hampshire, Ctr Space Sci, Durham, NH 03824 USA
[13] Univ New Hampshire, Dept Phys, Durham, NH 03824 USA
关键词
Sun: corona; Sun: coronal mass ejections (CMEs); IN-SITU OBSERVATIONS; FORCE-FREE FIELD; FLUX ROPE; SOLAR-WIND; CLOUDS; SIMULATION; EVOLUTION; MAGNETOSPHERE; HELICITY; CYLINDER;
D O I
10.1007/s11207-013-0244-5
中图分类号
P1 [天文学];
学科分类号
0704 ;
摘要
This study aims to provide a reference for different magnetic field models and reconstruction methods for interplanetary coronal mass ejections (ICMEs). To understand the differences in the outputs of these models and codes, we analyzed 59 events from the Coordinated Data Analysis Workshop (CDAW) list, using four different magnetic field models and reconstruction techniques; force-free fitting, magnetostatic reconstruction using a numerical solution to the Grad-Shafranov equation, fitting to a self-similarly expanding cylindrical configuration and elliptical, non-force-free fitting. The resulting parameters of the reconstructions for the 59 events are compared statistically and in selected case studies. The ability of a method to fit or reconstruct an event is found to vary greatly; this depends on whether the event is a magnetic cloud or not. We find that the magnitude of the axial field is relatively consistent across models, but that the axis orientation of the ejecta is not. We also find that there are a few cases with different signs of the magnetic helicity for the same event when we leave the boundaries free to vary, which illustrates that this simplest of parameters is not necessarily always clearly constrained by fitting and reconstruction models. Finally, we examine three unique cases in depth to provide a comprehensive idea of the different aspects of how the fitting and reconstruction codes work.
引用
收藏
页码:129 / 149
页数:21
相关论文
共 82 条
[1]   ON THE INTERNAL STRUCTURE OF THE MAGNETIC FIELD IN MAGNETIC CLOUDS AND INTERPLANETARY CORONAL MASS EJECTIONS: WRITHE VERSUS TWIST [J].
Al-Haddad, N. ;
Roussev, I. I. ;
Moestl, C. ;
Jacobs, C. ;
Lugaz, N. ;
Poedts, S. ;
Farrugia, C. J. .
ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL LETTERS, 2011, 738 (02)
[2]  
Bothmer V, 1998, ANN GEOPHYS-ATM HYDR, V16, P1, DOI 10.1007/s00585-997-0001-x
[3]  
BURLAGA L, 1981, J GEOPHYS RES-SPACE, V86, P6673, DOI 10.1029/JA086iA08p06673
[4]   Successive CMEs and complex ejecta [J].
Burlaga, LF ;
Plunkett, SP ;
St Cyr, OC .
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-SPACE PHYSICS, 2002, 107 (A10)
[5]   MAGNETIC CLOUDS AND FORCE-FREE FIELDS WITH CONSTANT-ALPHA [J].
BURLAGA, LF .
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-SPACE PHYSICS, 1988, 93 (A7) :7217-7224
[6]   Inverse and normal coronal mass ejections:: evolution up to 1 AU [J].
Chané, E ;
Van der Holst, B ;
Jacobs, C ;
Poedts, S ;
Kimpe, D .
ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS, 2006, 447 (02) :727-733
[7]   Progressive transformation of a flux rope to an ICME [J].
Dasso, S. ;
Nakwacki, M. S. ;
Demoulin, P. ;
Mandrini, C. H. .
SOLAR PHYSICS, 2007, 244 (1-2) :115-137
[8]   A new model-independent method to compute magnetic helicity in magnetic clouds [J].
Dasso, S. ;
Mandrini, C. H. ;
Demoulin, P. ;
Luoni, M. L. .
ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS, 2006, 455 (01) :349-359
[9]   Magnetic helicity analysis of an interplanetary twisted flux tube -: art. no. 1362 [J].
Dasso, S ;
Mandrini, CH ;
Démoulin, P ;
Farrugia, CJ .
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-SPACE PHYSICS, 2003, 108 (A10)
[10]   Magnetic cloud models with bent and oblate cross-section boundaries [J].
Demoulin, P. ;
Dasso, S. .
ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS, 2009, 507 (02) :969-980