Fusion of High Resolution Aerial Multispectral and LiDAR Data: Land Cover in the Context of Urban Mosquito Habitat

被引:79
作者
Hartfield, Kyle A. [1 ]
Landau, Katheryn I. [2 ]
van Leeuwen, Willem J. D. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Arizona, Off Arid Lands Studies, Sch Nat Resources & Environm, Arizona Remote Sensing Ctr, Tucson, AZ 85721 USA
[2] Univ Arizona, Sch Geog & Dev, Tucson, AZ 85721 USA
关键词
LiDAR; multispectral; data fusion; urban; public health; Tucson; Arizona; land cover classification; mosquito; West Nile Virus; IMPERVIOUS SURFACE; CLASSIFICATION; IMAGERY; VEGETATION; ACCURACY;
D O I
10.3390/rs3112364
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Remotely sensed multi-spectral and -spatial data facilitates the study of mosquito-borne disease vectors and their response to land use and cover composition in the urban environment. In this study we assess the feasibility of integrating remotely sensed multispectral reflectance data and LiDAR (Light Detection and Ranging)-derived height information to improve land use and land cover classification. Classification and Regression Tree (CART) analyses were used to compare and contrast the enhancements and accuracy of the multi-sensor urban land cover classifications. Eight urban land-cover classes were developed for the city of Tucson, Arizona, USA. These land cover classes focus on pervious and impervious surfaces and microclimate landscape attributes that impact mosquito habitat such as water ponds, residential structures, irrigated lawns, shrubs and trees, shade, and humidity. Results show that synergistic use of LiDAR, multispectral and the Normalized Difference Vegetation Index data produced the most accurate urban land cover classification with a Kappa value of 0.88. Fusion of multi-sensor data leads to a better land cover product that is suitable for a variety of urban applications such as exploring the relationship between neighborhood composition and adult mosquito abundance data to inform public health issues.
引用
收藏
页码:2364 / 2383
页数:20
相关论文
共 39 条
[1]  
AFPO, 2011, NAT AGR IM PROGR
[2]  
Alonso MC, 2008, LECT NOTES COMPUT SC, V5359, P85, DOI 10.1007/978-3-540-89646-3_9
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2011, DAT MIN TOOLS SEE5 C
[4]   A COMPARISON OF SUPERVISED MAXIMUM-LIKELIHOOD AND DECISION TREE CLASSIFICATION FOR CROP COVER ESTIMATION FROM MULTITEMPORAL LANDSAT MSS DATA [J].
BELWARD, AS ;
DEHOYOS, A .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF REMOTE SENSING, 1987, 8 (02) :229-235
[5]   Integrating LIDAR data and multispectral imagery for enhanced classification of rangeland vegetation: A meta analysis [J].
Bork, Edward W. ;
Su, Jason G. .
REMOTE SENSING OF ENVIRONMENT, 2007, 111 (01) :11-24
[6]   Object-oriented land cover classification of lidar-derived surfaces [J].
Brennan, R. ;
Webster, T. L. .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF REMOTE SENSING, 2006, 32 (02) :162-172
[7]  
Charaniya A.P., 2004, CVPRW'04, Proceedings of the IEEE 2004 Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshop, 27 June - 2 July 2004, Baltimore, Md, V3, P1
[8]  
Chen J., 1996, THESIS U UTAH SALT L, P54
[10]   A COEFFICIENT OF AGREEMENT FOR NOMINAL SCALES [J].
COHEN, J .
EDUCATIONAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT, 1960, 20 (01) :37-46