Phase II trial of gemcitabine, epirubicin and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor in patients with advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma

被引:31
|
作者
Scheithauer, W
Kornek, GV
Raderer, M
Hejna, M
Valencak, J
Miholic, J
Kovats, E
Lang, F
Funovics, J
Bareck, E
Depisch, D
机构
[1] Univ Vienna, Sch Med, Dept Internal Med 1, Div Oncol, A-1090 Vienna, Austria
[2] Baden Gen Hosp, Dept Surg, A-2500 Baden, Austria
[3] Neunkirchen Gen Hosp, Dept Surg, A-2620 Neunkirchen, Austria
[4] Stockerau Gen Hosp, Dept Surg, A-2000 Stockerau, Austria
[5] Wr Neustadt Gen Hosp, Dept Surg, A-2700 Wr Neustadt, Austria
关键词
pancreatic cancer; chemotherapy; gemcitabine; epirubicin;
D O I
10.1038/sj.bjc.6690600
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Although the novel cytidin analogue gemcitabine has shown superior anti-tumour activity than 5-fluorouracil in advanced pancreatic cancer, further improvements of therapeutic results are warranted. This goal might be achieved by combining gemcitabine with other active drugs. This trial evaluated the efficacy and tolerance of such a combination regimen with epirubicin and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) in patients with metastatic disease. Seventy patients with metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma were enrolled in this multicentre trial. Patients received 4-weekly courses of a combination regimen consisting of epirubicin 60 mg m(-2) given as intravenous bolus injection on day 1, gemcitabine 1000 mg m-2 infused over 30 min on days 1, 8 and 15, and G-CSF administered at 5 mu g kg-l day-l subcutaneously from days 2-6 during each cycle. The efficacy of treatment was assessed by conventional measures, i.e. objective response, progression-free and overall survival, as well as by analysis of clinical benefit response (defined as greater than or equal to 50% reduction in pain intensity, greater than or equal to 50% reduction in daily analgesic consumption, and/or greater than or equal to 20-point improvement in Karnofsky performance status that was sustained for greater than or equal to 4 consecutive weeks). Of 66 patients evaluable for objective response, one achieved complete and 13 partial remissions, for an overall response rate of 21% (95% confidence interval (CI), 12-33%); 27 additional patients (41%) had stable and 25 (38%) increasing disease. The median time to progression was 3.8 months. Median survival was 7.8 months, and the probability of surviving beyond 12 months was 21.2%. Out of 60 patients with tumour-related symptoms, who were considered evaluable for clinical benefit response, 26 (43%) experienced significant palliation, The median time to achieve a clinical benefit response was 7 weeks, and its median duration was 22 weeks. Chemotherapy was well-tolerated with leukopenia/granulocytopenia representing the most common and dose-limiting side-effect. Gastrointestinal and other subjective toxicities were infrequent and generally rated minor. We conclude that the combination of gemcitabine, epirubicin and G-CSF seems to be an effective palliative treatment with only moderate toxic effects in patients with metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Our results in terms of objective and clinical benefit response, as well as survival seem to suggest an advantage over gemcitabine-monotherapy, though this remains to be confirmed in a randomized trial.
引用
收藏
页码:1797 / 1802
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] A phase II study of escalated-dose docetaxel with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor support in patients with advanced breast cancer
    Mitchell, PLR
    Basser, R
    Chipman, M
    Grigg, A
    Mansfield, R
    Cebon, J
    Davis, ID
    Appia, F
    Green, M
    ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2004, 15 (04) : 585 - 589
  • [32] Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor use in cancer patients
    Baker, J
    McCune, JS
    Harvey, RD
    Bonsignore, C
    Lindley, CM
    ANNALS OF PHARMACOTHERAPY, 2000, 34 (7-8) : 851 - 857
  • [33] Combination therapy with mitoxantrone fluorouracil, leucovorin, and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor in patients with advanced breast cancer: A phase II study
    Ginopoulos, P
    Giannios, Y
    Cardamakis, E
    Koukouras, D
    Spiropoulos, K
    Mastronikolis, NS
    Solomou, E
    Rathossis, S
    Tzingounis, V
    CURRENT THERAPEUTIC RESEARCH-CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL, 1998, 59 (02): : 73 - 79
  • [34] PHASE-I/II STUDY OF RECOMBINANT HUMAN GRANULOCYTE-MACROPHAGE COLONY-STIMULATING FACTOR IN PATIENTS WITH ADVANCED MALIGNANCY
    MIWA, S
    SHIBATA, A
    KANEKO, T
    MORIYAMA, Y
    KAKU, K
    ISHIDA, Y
    TAKAHASHI, M
    ACTA HAEMATOLOGICA, 1992, 87 (1-2) : 22 - 28
  • [35] Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor and hypercoagulability
    Kaptan, Kuersat
    Beyan, Cengiz
    Ifran, Ahmet
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2008, 131 (01) : 129 - 129
  • [36] Cytopathology of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor-producing lung adenocarcinoma
    Kimura, M
    Hiruma, S
    Hara, S
    Hashimoto, S
    ACTA CYTOLOGICA, 1997, 41 (03) : 952 - 953
  • [37] Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor and leukemogenesis
    de Figueiredo, LL
    Lima, RSDE
    Rego, EM
    MEDIATORS OF INFLAMMATION, 2004, 13 (03) : 145 - 150
  • [38] RECOMBINANT HUMAN GRANULOCYTE-MACROPHAGE COLONY-STIMULATING FACTOR IN PATIENTS WITH MYELODYSPLASTIC SYNDROMES - A PHASE-I/II TRIAL
    GANSER, A
    VOLKERS, B
    GREHER, J
    WALTHER, F
    HOELZER, D
    ONKOLOGIE, 1988, 11 (01): : 53 - 55
  • [39] Phase II trial of subcutaneously administered granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma
    Wos, E
    Olencki, T
    Tuason, L
    Budd, GT
    Peereboom, D
    Sandstrom, K
    McLain, D
    Finke, J
    Bukowski, RM
    CANCER, 1996, 77 (06) : 1149 - 1153
  • [40] Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor induces neutrophils to secrete macrophage colony-stimulating factor
    Santiago, E
    Mora, L
    Bautista, M
    Montesinos, JJ
    Martinez, I
    Ramos, G
    Zambrano, IR
    Manrique, B
    Weiss-Steider, B
    CYTOKINE, 2001, 15 (06) : 299 - 304