Environmental impact of the typical heavy pig production in Italy

被引:51
|
作者
Bava, Luciana [1 ]
Zucali, Maddalena [1 ]
Sandrucci, Anna [1 ]
Tamburini, Alberto [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Milan, Dipartimento Sci Agr Ambientali, Via Celoria 2, I-20133 Milan, Italy
关键词
Heavy pig; Environmental impact; Life Cycle Assessment; Greenhouse gas emission; Dry-cured ham; LIFE-CYCLE ASSESSMENT; GREENHOUSE-GAS EMISSIONS; FARMING SYSTEMS; SLAUGHTER; ENERGY;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.11.029
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The Italian pig sector is mainly focused on the production of heavy pigs used for the traditional dry-cured hams. At slaughter a minimum of 160 kg and 9 months age are required to comply with the production specifications of the ham consortia. Advancing livestock age and increasing fat deposition negatively affect feed conversion ratio, which is one of the main determinants of meat production environmental impact. The aim of the study was to provide a first evaluation of the environmental impact potentials of heavy pig production in Italy through a Life Cycle Assessment approach. Additional objectives were to identify the main hot spots and the most important data gaps in the analysis. A cradle to farm gate Life Cycle Assessment was performed in 6 intensive pig farms located in Northern Italy. Key parameters concerning on-farm activities, inputs and outputs were collected through personal interviews with farmers. The functional unit was 1 kg live weight. Direct land use change was considered in the emissions of imported soybean. The average pig slaughter live weight was 168.7 +/- 33.3 kg. Environmental impacts per kg live weight were generally higher than those generated in the production of pigs slaughtered at lower weight. The global warming potential was on average 4.25 +/- 1.03 kg CO2 eq/kg live weight. Feed chain (crop production at farm and purchased feed) was the major source of impact for all the categories and the most important hotspot of heavy pig production. Farm size and reproductive efficiency appeared important factors in the environmental burden of heavy pig production: the largest and most efficient farm (as live weight produced per sow) had impact potentials per kg live weight much lower than those generated in the less efficient farm and similar to the ones reported on pigs slaughtered at a lower weight. The wide range of impact values within farms reveals opportunities for environmental improvements in the production of the traditional heavy pig. There is a need for further data and models on methane enteric emissions and nitrogen excretions above 100 kg of live weight (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:685 / 691
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Environmental impact of the subcritical production of silica aerogels
    Pinto, Isabel
    Silvestre, Jose D.
    de Brito, Jorge
    Julio, Maria F.
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2020, 252
  • [42] Environmental impact of Agaricus bisporus mycelium production
    Leiva, F. J.
    Saenz-Diez, J. C.
    Martinez, E.
    Jimenez, E.
    Blanco, J.
    AGRICULTURAL SYSTEMS, 2015, 138 : 38 - 45
  • [43] Environmental Impact Assessment of Discharged Heavy Metals in Textile Production
    Ji, Xiang
    Qian, Weiran
    Qiu, Xiaoxiao
    Yang, Yiduo
    Xu, Pinghua
    Wang, Laili
    FIBRES & TEXTILES IN EASTERN EUROPE, 2021, 29 (01) : 66 - 69
  • [44] Effect of farming strategies on environmental impact of intensive dairy farms in Italy
    Guerci, Matteo
    Bava, Luciana
    Zucali, Maddalena
    Sandrucci, Anna
    Penati, Chiara
    Tamburini, Alberto
    JOURNAL OF DAIRY RESEARCH, 2013, 80 (03) : 300 - 308
  • [45] Environmental Impact Assessment of an Organic Wine Production in Central Italy: Case Study from Lazio
    Vinci, Giuliana
    Prencipe, Sabrina Antonia
    Abbafati, Ada
    Filippi, Matteo
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2022, 14 (22)
  • [46] Environmental impact of electricity from selected geothermal power plants in Italy
    Bravi, Mirko
    Basosi, Riccardo
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2014, 66 : 301 - 308
  • [47] Optimizing cost and environmental impact of pig diets
    Burek, J.
    Thoma, G.
    Maxwell, C. V.
    Popp, J.
    Ulrich, R.
    JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2016, 94 : 53 - 53
  • [48] Carbon footprint of a typical pomelo production region in China based on farm survey data
    Chen, Xiaohui
    Xu, Xiuzhu
    Lu, Zhenya
    Zhang, Weiqiang
    Yang, Jinchang
    Hou, Yong
    Wang, Xiaozhong
    Zhou, Shungui
    Li, Yan
    Wu, Liangquan
    Zhang, Fusuo
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2020, 277
  • [49] Environmental Impact Assessment of Sustainable Pig Farm via Management of Nutrient and Co-Product Flows in the Farm
    Venslauskas, Kestutis
    Navickas, Kestutis
    Rubezius, Mantas
    Tilvikiene, Vita
    Suproniene, Skaidre
    Doyeni, Modupe Olufemi
    Barcauskaite, Karolina
    Baksinskaite, Ausra
    Buneviciene, Kristina
    AGRONOMY-BASEL, 2022, 12 (04):
  • [50] A method to estimate the environmental impacts from genetic change in pig production systems
    Mathias Ottosen
    Stephen G. Mackenzie
    Michael Wallace
    Ilias Kyriazakis
    The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 2020, 25 : 523 - 537