3D spatial conservation prioritisation: Accounting for depth in marine environments

被引:30
作者
Venegas-Li, Ruben [1 ,2 ]
Levin, Noam [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Possingham, Hugh [2 ,5 ]
Kark, Salit [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Queensland, Biodivers Res Grp, Sch Biol Sci, Ctr Biodivers & Conservat Sci, St Lucia, Qld, Australia
[2] Univ Queensland, ARC Ctr Excellence Environm Decis CEED, St Lucia, Qld, Australia
[3] Hebrew Univ Jerusalem, Dept Geog, Jerusalem, Israel
[4] Univ Queensland, Sch Earth & Environm Sci, St Lucia, Qld, Australia
[5] Nature Conservancy, Conservat Sci, South Brisbane, Qld, Australia
来源
METHODS IN ECOLOGY AND EVOLUTION | 2018年 / 9卷 / 03期
关键词
3D planning; biodiversity; marine conservation; Marxan; systematic conservation planning; vertical; zoning; PROTECTED AREAS; DYNAMIC OCEAN; MANAGEMENT; ECOSYSTEMS; EFFICIENCY; COSTS;
D O I
10.1111/2041-210X.12896
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
While marine environments are three-dimensional (3D) in nature, current approaches and tools for planning and prioritising actions in the ocean are predominantly two dimensional. Here, we develop a novel 3D marine spatial conservation prioritisation approach, which explicitly accounts for the inherent vertical heterogeneity of the ocean. This enables both vertical and horizontal spatial prioritisation to be performed simultaneously. To our knowledge, this is the first endeavour to develop prioritisation of conservation actions in 3D. We applied the 3D spatial conservation prioritisation approach to the Mediterranean Sea as a case study. We first subdivided the Mediterranean Sea into 3D planning units by assigning them a z coordinate (representing depth). We further partitioned these 3D planning units vertically into three depth layers; this allowed us to quantify biodiversity (1,011 species and 19 geomorphic features) and the cost of conservation actions at different depths. We adapted the prioritisation software Marxan to identify 3D networks of sites where biodiversity conservation targets are achieved for the minimum cost. Using the 3D approach presented here, we identified networks of sites where conservation targets for all biodiversity features were achieved. Importantly, these networks included areas of the ocean where only particular depth layers along the water column were identified as priorities for conservation. The 3D approach also proved to be more cost-efficient than the traditional 2D approach. Spatial priorities within the networks of sites selected were considerably different when comparing the 2D and 3D approaches. Prioritising in 3D allows conservation and marine spatial planners to target specific threats to specific conservation features, at specific depths in the ocean. This provides a platform to further integrate systematic conservation planning into the wider ongoing and future marine spatial planning and ocean zoning processes.
引用
收藏
页码:773 / 784
页数:12
相关论文
共 55 条
  • [1] Opportunity costs: Who really pays for conservation?
    Adams, Vanessa M.
    Pressey, Robert L.
    Naidoo, Robin
    [J]. BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION, 2010, 143 (02) : 439 - 448
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2009, SPATIAL CONSERVATION
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2013, NOAA ATLAS NESDIA
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2014, The GEBCO_2014 Grid, version 20150318
  • [5] Ardron J.A., 2010, Marxan Good Practices Handbook
  • [6] Optimizing enforcement and compliance in offshore marine protected areas: a case study from Cocos Island, Costa Rica
    Arias, Adrian
    Pressey, Robert L.
    Jones, Rhondda E.
    Alvarez-Romero, Jorge G.
    Cinner, Joshua E.
    [J]. ORYX, 2016, 50 (01) : 18 - 26
  • [7] Ball I.R., 2009, SPATIAL CONSERVATION, P185, DOI DOI 10.1111/EVA.12631
  • [8] Systematic Conservation Planning: A Better Recipe for Managing the High Seas for Biodiversity Conservation and Sustainable Use
    Ban, Natalie C.
    Bax, Nicholas J.
    Gjerde, Kristina M.
    Devillers, Rodolphe
    Dunn, Daniel C.
    Dunstan, Piers K.
    Hobday, Alistair J.
    Maxwell, Sara M.
    Kaplan, David M.
    Pressey, Robert L.
    Ardron, Jeff A.
    Game, Edward T.
    Halpin, Patrick N.
    [J]. CONSERVATION LETTERS, 2014, 7 (01): : 41 - 54
  • [9] Spatial socioeconomic data as a cost in systematic marine conservation planning
    Ban, Natalie Corinna
    Klein, Carissa Joy
    [J]. CONSERVATION LETTERS, 2009, 2 (05): : 206 - 215
  • [10] Incorporating asymmetric connectivity into spatial decision making for conservation
    Beger, Maria
    Linke, Simon
    Watts, Matt
    Game, Eddie
    Treml, Eric
    Ball, Ian
    Possingham, Hugh P.
    [J]. CONSERVATION LETTERS, 2010, 3 (05): : 359 - 368