Class II Division 1 malocclusion treatment with extraction of maxillary first molars: Evaluation of treatment and post-treatment changes by the PAR Index

被引:6
|
作者
Booij, Johan W.
Kuijpers-Jagtman, Anne Marie [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Bronkhorst, Ewald M. [4 ]
Livas, Christos [5 ]
Ren, Yijin [1 ,6 ]
Kuijpers, Mette A. R. [7 ]
Katsaros, Christos [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Med Ctr Groningen, Dept Orthodont, Groningen, Netherlands
[2] Univ Bern, Med Fac, Sch Dent Med, Dept Orthodont & Dentofacial Orthoped, Bern, Switzerland
[3] Univ Indonesia, Fac Dent, Jakarta, Indonesia
[4] Radboud Univ Nijmegen, Med Ctr, Radboud Inst Hlth Sci, Dept Dent, Nijmegen, Netherlands
[5] Dent Clin Zwolle, Zwolle, Netherlands
[6] Univ Med Ctr Groningen, WJ Kolff Inst Biomed Engn & Mat Sci, Groningen, Netherlands
[7] Radboud Univ Nijmegen, Med Ctr, Dept Dent Orthodont & Craniofacial Biol, Nijmegen, Netherlands
关键词
angle class II; longitudinal study; maxillary first molar extraction; PAR index; treatment outcome; ORTHODONTIC TREATMENT; PREMOLAR EXTRACTION; STABILITY; RETENTION; PREVALENCE; EFFICIENCY; APPLIANCE;
D O I
10.1111/ocr.12412
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Objective To investigate occlusal result and post-treatment changes after orthodontic extraction of maxillary first permanent molars in patients with a Class II division 1 malocclusion. Setting and Sample Retrospective longitudinal study in a private practice, with outcome evaluation by an independent academic hospital. Ninety-six patients (53 males, 43 females) consecutively treated by one orthodontist with maxillary first permanent molar extraction were studied, divided into three facial types, based on pre-treatment cephalometric values: hypodivergent (n = 18), normodivergent (n = 21) and hyperdivergent (n = 57). Methods Occlusal outcome was scored on dental casts at T1 (pre-treatment), T2 (post-treatment) and T3 (mean follow-up 2.5 +/- 0.9 years) using the weighted Peer Assessment Rating (PAR) Index. The paired samplettest and one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey's post hoc test were used for statistical analysis. Results PAR was reduced by 95.7% and 89.9% at T2 and T3, respectively, compared with the start of treatment. The largest post-treatment changes were found for overjet and buccal occlusion. Linear regression analysis did not reveal a clear effect (R-Square 0.074) of age, sex, PAR score at T1, incremental PAR score T2-T1, overjet and overbite at T1, and facial type on the changes after treatment (incremental PAR score T3-T2). Conclusions The occlusal outcome achieved after Class II division 1 treatment with maxillary first permanent molar extractions was maintained to a large extent over a mean post-treatment follow-up of 2.5 years. Limited changes after treatment were found, for which no risk factors could be discerned.
引用
收藏
页码:102 / 110
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Treatment stability in patients with Class II malocclusion treated with 2 maxillary premolar extractions or without extractions
    Janson, Guilherme
    Camardella, Leonardo Tavares
    Valle Araki, Janine Della
    de Freitas, Marcos Roberto
    Pinzan, Arnaldo
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS, 2010, 138 (01) : 16 - 22
  • [42] Evaluation of Postorthodontic Changes in the Treatment of Cleft Lip and Palate Patients Using the PAR Index
    Trimetsuntorn, Kunakorn
    Manosudprasit, Amornrut
    Manosudprasit, Aggasit
    Phaoseree, Natthawee
    Pisek, Araya
    Pisek, Poonsak
    CLEFT PALATE-CRANIOFACIAL JOURNAL, 2020, 57 (01): : 29 - 34
  • [43] Morphological changes in the temporomandibular joint after orthodontic treatment for Angle Class II malocclusion
    Koide, Daigo
    Yamada, Kazuhiro
    Yamaguchi, Ayane
    Kageyama, Toru
    Taguchi, Akira
    CRANIO-THE JOURNAL OF CRANIOMANDIBULAR & SLEEP PRACTICE, 2018, 36 (01): : 35 - 43
  • [44] Angular and positional changes of the maxillary third molars after orthodontic treatment with different premolar extraction patterns
    de la Rosa, Maria R. Mang
    Langer, Lisa J.
    Kouroupakis-Bakouros, Fotis
    Jost-Brinkmann, Paul-Georg
    Bartzela, Theodosia N.
    ANGLE ORTHODONTIST, 2023, 93 (02) : 135 - 143
  • [45] Treatment decisions of patients with Class II Division 2 malocclusion and severe tooth wear: a systematic review
    Ma, Yuhan
    Zhao, Weijia
    Zhang, Sisi
    Jin, Xiaoting
    Xu, Jianhao
    Fu, Baiping
    Shi, Ying
    BDJ OPEN, 2024, 10 (01)
  • [46] Non-Surgical Treatment of Class II Division 1 Malocclusion in an Adult Patient with a Missing Lower Lateral Incisor Tooth: A Case Report
    Wani, Mohsin Aslam
    Autar, Ram
    Siddiqui, Shiraz
    Amir, Mohd
    Trivedi, Shashank
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND DIAGNOSTIC RESEARCH, 2023, 17 (10) : ZD14 - ZD17
  • [47] Long-term occlusal and soft-tissue profile outcomes after treatment of Class II Division 1 malocclusion with fixed appliances
    McGuinness, Niall J. P.
    Burden, Donald J.
    Hunt, Orlagh T.
    Johnston, Chris D.
    Stevenson, Mike
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS, 2011, 139 (03) : 362 - 368
  • [48] Treatment effects of R-Appliance and Frankel-2 in Class II division 1 malocclusions
    Showkatbakhsh, R.
    Castaldo, M. I.
    Jamilian, A.
    Padricelli, G.
    Hanzayi, M. Fahimi
    Cappabianca, S.
    Perillo, L.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PAEDIATRIC DENTISTRY, 2013, 14 (01) : 17 - 22
  • [49] Comparative efficiency of Class II malocclusion treatment with the pendulum appliance or two maxillary premolar extractions and edgewire appliances
    Maio Pinzan-Vercelino, Celia Regina
    Janson, Guilherme
    Pinzan, Arnaldo
    de Almeida, Renato Rodrigues
    de Freitas, Marcos Roberto
    Salvatore de Freitas, Karina Maria
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS, 2009, 31 (03) : 333 - 340
  • [50] Influence of unilateral maxillary first molar extraction treatment on second and third molar inclination in Class II subdivision patients
    Livas, Christos
    Pandis, Nikolaos
    Booij, Johan Willem
    Halazonetis, Demetrios J.
    Katsaros, Christos
    Ren, Yijin
    ANGLE ORTHODONTIST, 2016, 86 (01) : 94 - 100