Class II Division 1 malocclusion treatment with extraction of maxillary first molars: Evaluation of treatment and post-treatment changes by the PAR Index

被引:6
|
作者
Booij, Johan W.
Kuijpers-Jagtman, Anne Marie [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Bronkhorst, Ewald M. [4 ]
Livas, Christos [5 ]
Ren, Yijin [1 ,6 ]
Kuijpers, Mette A. R. [7 ]
Katsaros, Christos [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Med Ctr Groningen, Dept Orthodont, Groningen, Netherlands
[2] Univ Bern, Med Fac, Sch Dent Med, Dept Orthodont & Dentofacial Orthoped, Bern, Switzerland
[3] Univ Indonesia, Fac Dent, Jakarta, Indonesia
[4] Radboud Univ Nijmegen, Med Ctr, Radboud Inst Hlth Sci, Dept Dent, Nijmegen, Netherlands
[5] Dent Clin Zwolle, Zwolle, Netherlands
[6] Univ Med Ctr Groningen, WJ Kolff Inst Biomed Engn & Mat Sci, Groningen, Netherlands
[7] Radboud Univ Nijmegen, Med Ctr, Dept Dent Orthodont & Craniofacial Biol, Nijmegen, Netherlands
关键词
angle class II; longitudinal study; maxillary first molar extraction; PAR index; treatment outcome; ORTHODONTIC TREATMENT; PREMOLAR EXTRACTION; STABILITY; RETENTION; PREVALENCE; EFFICIENCY; APPLIANCE;
D O I
10.1111/ocr.12412
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Objective To investigate occlusal result and post-treatment changes after orthodontic extraction of maxillary first permanent molars in patients with a Class II division 1 malocclusion. Setting and Sample Retrospective longitudinal study in a private practice, with outcome evaluation by an independent academic hospital. Ninety-six patients (53 males, 43 females) consecutively treated by one orthodontist with maxillary first permanent molar extraction were studied, divided into three facial types, based on pre-treatment cephalometric values: hypodivergent (n = 18), normodivergent (n = 21) and hyperdivergent (n = 57). Methods Occlusal outcome was scored on dental casts at T1 (pre-treatment), T2 (post-treatment) and T3 (mean follow-up 2.5 +/- 0.9 years) using the weighted Peer Assessment Rating (PAR) Index. The paired samplettest and one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey's post hoc test were used for statistical analysis. Results PAR was reduced by 95.7% and 89.9% at T2 and T3, respectively, compared with the start of treatment. The largest post-treatment changes were found for overjet and buccal occlusion. Linear regression analysis did not reveal a clear effect (R-Square 0.074) of age, sex, PAR score at T1, incremental PAR score T2-T1, overjet and overbite at T1, and facial type on the changes after treatment (incremental PAR score T3-T2). Conclusions The occlusal outcome achieved after Class II division 1 treatment with maxillary first permanent molar extractions was maintained to a large extent over a mean post-treatment follow-up of 2.5 years. Limited changes after treatment were found, for which no risk factors could be discerned.
引用
收藏
页码:102 / 110
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Treatment and stability of Class II Division 2 malocclusion in children and adolescents: A systematic review
    Millett, Declan T.
    Cunningham, Susan J.
    O'Brien, Kevin D.
    Benson, Philip E.
    de Oliveira, Cesar M.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS, 2012, 142 (02) : 159 - U189
  • [32] A Comparative Analysis of Arch Widths in Class I and Class II Malocclusion: Extraction vs. Non-extraction Treatment
    Hegde, Anusha
    Lohith, D.
    Shailaja, A. M.
    Geevee, Ajith
    Srikant, Rohith M.
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2024, 16 (04)
  • [33] Esthetic perception of facial profile changes after extraction and nonextraction Class II treatment
    Rocha, Andrea Damasceno
    Vieira Freire Casteluci, Cleomaria Evelyn
    Carvalho Ferreira, Fernando Pedrin
    Conti, Ana Claudia
    Almeida, Marcio Rodrigues
    Almeida-Pedrin, Renata Rodrigues
    BRAZILIAN ORAL RESEARCH, 2020, 34
  • [34] Post-treatment evaluation of a magnetic activator device in Class II high-angle malocclusions
    Yuksel, Sema
    Kaygisiz, Emine
    Ulusoy, Cagri
    Keykubat, Alaattin
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS, 2010, 32 (04) : 425 - 429
  • [35] Class II division 1 malocclusion treatment trends in the last 10 years by skeletal classification: A review article
    Ardani, I. G. A. W.
    Aini, Hanifa
    Narmada, Ida B.
    Deshmukh, Shailesh
    Nugraha, Alexander P.
    JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL ORAL HEALTH, 2023, 15 (04): : 342 - 349
  • [36] Soft tissue profile changes during treatment of patients with class II malocclusion
    Milutinovic, Jovana
    Stamenkovic, Zorana
    Zelic, Ksenija
    Marinkovic, Nemanja
    Nedeljkovic, Nenad
    SRPSKI ARHIV ZA CELOKUPNO LEKARSTVO, 2022, 150 (5-6) : 261 - 266
  • [37] Improving lip aesthetics in the face profile after treatment of class II, division 2 malocclusion
    Koniarova, Zuzana
    Husarova, Romana
    Stefkova, Marie
    Spidlen, Milos
    Statelova, Dagmar
    Janickova, Maria
    Koniarova, Alena
    BRATISLAVA MEDICAL JOURNAL-BRATISLAVSKE LEKARSKE LISTY, 2022, 123 (03): : 185 - 190
  • [38] Treatment times of Class II malocclusion: four premolar and non-extraction protocols
    Janson, Guilherme
    Valarelli, Danilo Pinelli
    Valarelli, Fabricio Pinelli
    de Freitas, Marcos Roberto
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS, 2012, 34 (02) : 182 - 187
  • [39] Maxillary molar distalisation using palatal TAD-supported devices in the treatment of Class II malocclusion: a systematic review
    Fiorillo, Gianluigi
    Campobasso, Alessandra
    Mariani, Giorgio
    Lo Muzio, Eleonora
    Mandelli, Gualtiero
    Gastaldi, Giorgio
    AUSTRALASIAN ORTHODONTIC JOURNAL, 2022, 38 (01): : 202 - 212
  • [40] Maxillary molar distalization in treatment of angle class II malocclusion growing patients: Uncontrolled clinical trial
    Abdelhady, Noha Ali
    Tawfik, Marwa Ali
    Hammad, Shaza Mohammed
    INTERNATIONAL ORTHODONTICS, 2020, 18 (01) : 96 - 104