Loop ileostomy versus loop colostomy as temporary deviation after anterior resection for rectal cancer

被引:15
|
作者
Prassas, Dimitrios [1 ,2 ]
Vossos, Vasileios [1 ,2 ]
Rehders, Alexander [1 ,2 ]
Knoefel, Wolfram Trudo [1 ,2 ]
Krieg, Andreas [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Heinrich Heine Univ, Dept Surg, A Moorenstr 5, D-40225 Dusseldorf, Germany
[2] Univ Hosp Duesseldorf, A Moorenstr 5, D-40225 Dusseldorf, Germany
关键词
Protective ostomy; Loop ileostomy; Loop colostomy; Diversion stoma; ANASTOMOTIC LEAKAGE; SURGICAL COMPLICATIONS; RENAL-FAILURE; RISK-FACTORS; READMISSION; MORBIDITY; STOMA; DEHYDRATION; CARCINOMA; COHORT;
D O I
10.1007/s00423-020-01940-w
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Purpose Construction of a temporary stoma is a common adjunct to low anterior resection for rectal cancer and can be accomplished either with loop ileostomy (LI) or loop colostomy (LC) with the question of the most appropriate one still remaining controversial. The aim of this study is to compare stoma-related morbidity between the two groups. Methods A retrospective review was conducted including 148 consecutive patients (LI: 55/LC: 93) who underwent anterior resection for rectal cancer between January 2004 and December 2018 in our department. Time interval between low anterior resection and stoma reversal was similar for both groups. Comparison between the two groups was made regarding stoma-related morbidity after stoma construction and after stoma reversal, respectively. Results A total number of 17 patients suffered from complications after the construction of a protective LI compared with 25 patients after the construction of a LC (LI vs LC: 17/55 (30.1%) vs 25/93 (26.9%);p = 0.59). The most common morbidity noted in both groups before stoma closure was parastomal hernia, with the difference being statistically not significant (LI vs LC: 11/55 (20%) vs 21/93 (22.6%);p = 0.84). However, patients with LI suffered from significantly more peristomal skin irritations compared with the patients with LC (LI vs LC: 5/55 (9.1%) vs 1/93 (1.1%);p = 0.027). Overall morbidity rate after stoma closure was found to be comparable in both groups (LI vs LC: 7/37 (18.9%) vs 6/64 (9.4%);p = 0.16). The most common complication after stoma reversal was wound infection (LI vs LC: 5/37 (13.5%) vs 5/64 (7.8%);p = 0.49). Conclusion With the exception of a higher rate of skin irritation after LI construction, all other postoperative outcomes were found to be comparable in both study groups. Further randomized clinical trials are required to verify these findings. The study was registered in the German Registry for Clinical Trials (DRKS00020766, date of registration: 11.02.2020).
引用
收藏
页码:1147 / 1153
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Protective ileostomy does not prevent anastomotic leakage after anterior resection of rectal cancer
    Niu, Lei
    Wang, Jin
    Zhang, Peng
    Zhao, Xiaomu
    JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL MEDICAL RESEARCH, 2020, 48 (08)
  • [42] Protective ileostomy increased the incidence of rectal stenosis after anterior resection for rectal cancer
    Zhang, Hui
    Li, Shanshan
    Jin, Xin
    Wu, Xian
    Zhang, Zhiyuan
    Shen, Lijun
    Wan, Juefeng
    Wang, Yan
    Wang, Yaqi
    Yang, Wang
    Zhou, Menglong
    Zhang, Jing
    Lv, Tao
    Deng, Yun
    Xia, Fan
    Zhang, Zhen
    RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2022, 17 (01)
  • [43] Temporary umbilical loop colostomy for anorectal malformations
    Hamada, Yoshinori
    Takada, Kohei
    Nakamura, Yusuke
    Sato, Masahito
    Kwon, A-Hon
    PEDIATRIC SURGERY INTERNATIONAL, 2012, 28 (11) : 1133 - 1136
  • [44] Comparative study between transanal tube and loop ileostomy in low anterior resection for mid rectal cancer: a retrospective single center trial
    Kim, Min-Ki
    Won, Dae-Youn
    Lee, Jin-Kwon
    Kang, Won-Kyung
    Kim, Jun-Gi
    Oh, Seong Taek
    ANNALS OF SURGICAL TREATMENT AND RESEARCH, 2015, 88 (05) : 260 - 268
  • [45] Morbidity of temporary loop ileostomy in patients with colorectal cancer
    Thalheimer, Andreas
    Bueter, Marco
    Kortuem, Martin
    Thiede, Arnulf
    Meyer, Detlef
    DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2006, 49 (07) : 1011 - 1017
  • [46] Completely Diverted Tube Ileostomy Versus Conventional Loop Ileostomy
    Bulut, Alisina
    Attaallah, Wafi
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2022, 14 (11)
  • [47] Variations of the renal function parameters in rectal cancer patients with a defunctioning loop ileostomy
    Scripcariu, Dragos Viorel
    Siriopol, Dimitrie
    Moscalu, Mihaela
    Scripcariu, Viorel
    INTERNATIONAL UROLOGY AND NEPHROLOGY, 2018, 50 (08) : 1489 - 1495
  • [48] Morbidity of Temporary Loop Ileostomy in Patients with Colorectal Cancer
    Arun Peter Mathew
    Srinidhi M
    Chandramohan K
    Madhu Muralee
    Mira Wagh
    Indian Journal of Surgical Oncology, 2022, 13 : 468 - 473
  • [49] A temporary loop ileostomy affects renal function
    Bodil Gessler
    Eva Haglind
    Eva Angenete
    International Journal of Colorectal Disease, 2014, 29 : 1131 - 1135
  • [50] Loop ileostomy closure after laparoscopic versus open surgery: is there a difference?
    Hiranyakas, Art
    Rather, Assar
    da Silva, Giovanna
    Weiss, Eric G.
    Wexner, Steven D.
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2013, 27 (01): : 90 - 94