Loop ileostomy versus loop colostomy as temporary deviation after anterior resection for rectal cancer

被引:15
|
作者
Prassas, Dimitrios [1 ,2 ]
Vossos, Vasileios [1 ,2 ]
Rehders, Alexander [1 ,2 ]
Knoefel, Wolfram Trudo [1 ,2 ]
Krieg, Andreas [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Heinrich Heine Univ, Dept Surg, A Moorenstr 5, D-40225 Dusseldorf, Germany
[2] Univ Hosp Duesseldorf, A Moorenstr 5, D-40225 Dusseldorf, Germany
关键词
Protective ostomy; Loop ileostomy; Loop colostomy; Diversion stoma; ANASTOMOTIC LEAKAGE; SURGICAL COMPLICATIONS; RENAL-FAILURE; RISK-FACTORS; READMISSION; MORBIDITY; STOMA; DEHYDRATION; CARCINOMA; COHORT;
D O I
10.1007/s00423-020-01940-w
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Purpose Construction of a temporary stoma is a common adjunct to low anterior resection for rectal cancer and can be accomplished either with loop ileostomy (LI) or loop colostomy (LC) with the question of the most appropriate one still remaining controversial. The aim of this study is to compare stoma-related morbidity between the two groups. Methods A retrospective review was conducted including 148 consecutive patients (LI: 55/LC: 93) who underwent anterior resection for rectal cancer between January 2004 and December 2018 in our department. Time interval between low anterior resection and stoma reversal was similar for both groups. Comparison between the two groups was made regarding stoma-related morbidity after stoma construction and after stoma reversal, respectively. Results A total number of 17 patients suffered from complications after the construction of a protective LI compared with 25 patients after the construction of a LC (LI vs LC: 17/55 (30.1%) vs 25/93 (26.9%);p = 0.59). The most common morbidity noted in both groups before stoma closure was parastomal hernia, with the difference being statistically not significant (LI vs LC: 11/55 (20%) vs 21/93 (22.6%);p = 0.84). However, patients with LI suffered from significantly more peristomal skin irritations compared with the patients with LC (LI vs LC: 5/55 (9.1%) vs 1/93 (1.1%);p = 0.027). Overall morbidity rate after stoma closure was found to be comparable in both groups (LI vs LC: 7/37 (18.9%) vs 6/64 (9.4%);p = 0.16). The most common complication after stoma reversal was wound infection (LI vs LC: 5/37 (13.5%) vs 5/64 (7.8%);p = 0.49). Conclusion With the exception of a higher rate of skin irritation after LI construction, all other postoperative outcomes were found to be comparable in both study groups. Further randomized clinical trials are required to verify these findings. The study was registered in the German Registry for Clinical Trials (DRKS00020766, date of registration: 11.02.2020).
引用
收藏
页码:1147 / 1153
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Loop ileostomy versus loop colostomy as temporary deviation after anterior resection for rectal cancer
    Dimitrios Prassas
    Vasileios Vossos
    Alexander Rehders
    Wolfram Trudo Knoefel
    Andreas Krieg
    Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery, 2020, 405 : 1147 - 1153
  • [2] Meta-analysis: loop ileostomy versus colostomy to prevent complications of anterior resection for rectal cancer
    Yang, Shilai
    Tang, Gang
    Zhang, Yudi
    Wei, Zhengqiang
    Du, Donglin
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2024, 39 (01)
  • [3] Meta-analysis of elective surgical complications related to defunctioning loop ileostomy compared with loop colostomy after low anterior resection for rectal carcinoma
    Geng, Hong Zhi
    Nasier, Dilidan
    Liu, Bing
    Gao, Hua
    Xu, Yi Ke
    ANNALS OF THE ROYAL COLLEGE OF SURGEONS OF ENGLAND, 2015, 97 (07) : 494 - 501
  • [4] Loop ileostomy following anterior resection: is it really temporary?
    David, G. G.
    Slavin, J. P.
    Willmott, S.
    Corless, D. J.
    Khan, A. U.
    Selvasekar, C. R.
    COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2010, 12 (05) : 428 - 432
  • [5] Postoperative morbidity and mortality after anterior resection with preventive diverting loop ileostomy versus loop colostomy for rectal cancer: A updated systematic review and meta-analysis
    Du, Rui
    Zhou, Jiajie
    Tong, Guifan
    Chang, Yue
    Li, Dongliang
    Wang, Feng
    Ding, Xu
    Zhang, Qi
    Wang, Wei
    Wang, Liuhua
    Wang, Daorong
    EJSO, 2021, 47 (07): : 1514 - 1525
  • [6] Defunctioning Cannula Ileostomy After Lower Anterior Resection of Rectal Cancer
    Hua, Hanju
    Xu, Jiahe
    Chen, Wenbin
    Zhou, Xile
    Wang, Jinhai
    Sheng, Qinsong
    Lin, Jianjiang
    DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2014, 57 (11) : 1267 - 1274
  • [7] Loop ileostomy versus loop colostomy for fecal diversion
    Kucera, Walter B.
    Olson, Terrah J. Paul
    SEMINARS IN COLON AND RECTAL SURGERY, 2023, 34 (02)
  • [8] Ghost ileostomy after anterior resection for rectal cancer: a preliminary experience
    Gulla, Nino
    Trastulli, Stefano
    Boselli, Carlo
    Cirocchi, Roberto
    Cavaliere, Davide
    Verdecchia, Giorgio Maria
    Morelli, Umberto
    Gentile, Daniele
    Eugeni, Emilio
    Caracappa, Daniela
    Listorti, Chiara
    Sciannameo, Francesco
    Noya, Giuseppe
    LANGENBECKS ARCHIVES OF SURGERY, 2011, 396 (07) : 997 - 1007
  • [9] A temporary loop ileostomy affects renal function
    Gessler, Bodil
    Haglind, Eva
    Angenete, Eva
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2014, 29 (09) : 1131 - 1135
  • [10] Interventions to reduce dehydration related to defunctioning loop ileostomy after low anterior resection in rectal cancer: a prospective cohort study
    Munshi, Eihab
    Bengtsson, Eva
    Blomberg, Karin
    Syk, Ingvar
    Buchwald, Pamela
    ANZ JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2020, 90 (09) : 1627 - 1631