Incidence and prediction of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome in women undergoing gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist in vitro fertilization cycles

被引:291
|
作者
Papanikolaou, EG [1 ]
Pozzobon, C [1 ]
Kolibianakis, EM [1 ]
Camus, M [1 ]
Tournaye, H [1 ]
Fatemi, HM [1 ]
Van Steirteghem, A [1 ]
Devroey, P [1 ]
机构
[1] Dutch Speaking Brussels Free Univ, Univ Hosp, Ctr Reprod Med, Brussels, Belgium
关键词
OHSS; GnRH-antagonist; prediction; E-2; number of follicles;
D O I
10.1016/j.fertnstert.2005.07.1292
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective: To determine the incidence of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) in a large series of GnRH antagonist-stimulated cycles and to assess the predictive value of E-2 and the number of follicles on the day of hCG administration. Design: Prospective cohort study of women undergoing IVF treatment with a GnRH antagonist protocol over a 2-year period. Setting: Tertiary university hospital. Patient(s): One thousand eight hundred one patients who underwent 2,524 cycles. Intervention(s): Multifollicular ovarian stimulation with recombinant FSH and GnRH antagonist for IVF-ICSI treatment. Main Outcome Measure(s): Incidence of OHSS in GnRH antagonist cycles, predictive value of E-2, and number of follicles on the day of hCG for OHSS occurrence. Result(s): Fifty-three patients were hospitalized because of OHSS (2.1%; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.6-2.8). Early OHSS presented in 31 patients (1.2%; 95% CI: 0.9-1.8), whereas the late type was a complication in 22 patients (0.9%; 95% CI: 0.5-1.3). Late OHSS cases compared with the early OHSS cases always occurred in a pregnancy cycle (100% vs. 40%); had higher probability of being severe (72.7% vs. 42%), and more often were related to a multiple pregnancy (40% vs. 0). Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis for several E-2 concentrations and number of follicles with a diameter of >= 11 mm revealed that the predictive value of the optimal threshold of >= 13 follicles (85.5% sensitivity; 69% specificity) was statistically significantly superior to the optimal threshold of 2,560 ng/L for E-2 concentrations (53% sensitivity, 77% specificity) in identifying patients at risk for OHSS. Considering that severe OHSS represents the most clinically significant pattern, the combination of a threshold of >= 18 follicles and/or E-2 of >= 5,000 ng/L yields a 83% sensitivity rate with a specificity as high as 84% for the severe OHSS cases. Conclusion(s): Clinically significant OHSS still remains a limitation of multifollicular ovarian stimulation for IVF even with the use of GnRH antagonist protocols. The number of follicles can discriminate the patients who are at risk for developing OHSS, whereas E-2 concentrations are less reliable for the purpose of prediction. There is more than ever an urgent need for alternative final oocyte maturation-triggering medication.
引用
收藏
页码:112 / 120
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone Agonist Trigger: The Way to Eliminate Ovarian Hyperstimulation Syndrome - A 20-Year Experience
    Kol, Shahar
    Itskovitz-Eldor, Joseph
    SEMINARS IN REPRODUCTIVE MEDICINE, 2010, 28 (06) : 500 - 505
  • [42] Fresh versus frozen embryo transfer after gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist trigger in gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist cycles among high responder women: A randomized, multi-center study
    Aflatoonian, Abbas
    Mansoori-Torshizi, Mahnaz
    Mojtahedi, Maryam Farid
    Aflatoonian, Behrouz
    Khalili, Mohammaad Ali
    Amir-Arjmand, Mohammad Hossein
    Soleimani, Mehrdad
    Aflatoonian, Nastaran
    Oskouian, Homa
    Tabibnejad, Nasim
    Humaidan, Peter
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF REPRODUCTIVE BIOMEDICINE, 2018, 16 (01) : 9 - 18
  • [43] The effect of premature luteinizing hormone increases among high ovarian responders undergoing a gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist ovarian stimulation protocol
    Geng, Yudi
    Lai, Qiaohong
    Xun, Yang
    Jin, Lei
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS, 2018, 142 (01) : 97 - 103
  • [44] Introduction: Gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist triggering of final follicular maturation for in vitro fertilization
    Casper, Robert F.
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2015, 103 (04) : 865 - 866
  • [45] Analysis of relative factors and prediction model for optimal ovarian response with gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist protocol
    Jiang, Wenwen
    Zheng, Beihong
    Liao, Xiuhua
    Chen, Xiaojing
    Zhu, Suqin
    Li, Rongshan
    Zhang, Huale
    FRONTIERS IN ENDOCRINOLOGY, 2022, 13
  • [46] Consecutive gonadotropin-releasing hormone-antagonist in vitro fertilization cycles: does the elapsed time interval between successive treatments affect outcomes?
    Reichman, David E.
    Chung, Pak
    Meyer, Laura
    Greenwood, Eleni
    Davis, Owen
    Rosenwaks, Zev
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2013, 99 (05) : 1277 - 1282
  • [47] Medroxyprogesterone Acetate versus Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone Antagonist for the Prevention of Premature Luteinizing Hormone Surge in hyper-responder women undergoing controlled ovarian stimulation for IVF/ICSI Cycles
    Tandulwadkar, Sunita
    Gupta, Shruti
    Singh, Akhileshwar
    Mishra, Sneha
    Singhania, Samta
    JORNAL BRASILEIRO DE REPRODUCAO ASSISTIDA, 2023, 27 (01): : 15 - 19
  • [48] Luteinizing hormone supplementation increases pregnancy rates in gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist donor cycles
    Acevedo, B
    Sanchez, M
    Gomez, JL
    Cuadros, J
    Ricciarelli, E
    Hernández, ER
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2004, 82 (02) : 343 - 347
  • [49] Gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist/antagonist conversion with estrogen priming in low responders with prior in vitro fertilization failure
    Fisch, Jeffrey D.
    Keskintepe, Levent
    Sher, Geoffrey
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2008, 89 (02) : 342 - 347
  • [50] Comparison of gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists and antagonists in assisted reproduction cycles of polycystic ovarian syndrome patients
    Hosseini, Marzieh Agha
    Aleyasin, Ashraf
    Saeedi, Hojjatollah
    Mahdavi, Atossa
    JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY RESEARCH, 2010, 36 (03) : 605 - 610