Genetic variants in the MRPS30 region and postmenopausal breast cancer risk

被引:16
|
作者
Huang, Ying [1 ,2 ]
Ballinger, Dennis G. [3 ]
Dai, James Y. [1 ,2 ]
Peters, Ulrike [1 ,2 ]
Hinds, David A. [4 ]
Cox, David R. [3 ]
Beilharz, Erica [3 ]
Chlebowski, Rowan T. [5 ]
Rossouw, Jacques E. [6 ]
McTiernan, Anne [1 ,2 ]
Rohan, Thomas [7 ]
Prentice, Ross L. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Fred Hutchinson Canc Res Ctr, Div Publ Hlth Sci, Seattle, WA 98109 USA
[2] Fred Hutchinson Canc Res Ctr, Div Vaccine & Infect Dis, Seattle, WA 98109 USA
[3] Perlegen Sci Inc, Mountain View, CA 94043 USA
[4] 23andMe Inc, Mountain View, CA 94043 USA
[5] Harbor UCLA Res & Educ Inst, Div Med Oncol Hematol, Torrance, CA 90502 USA
[6] NHLBI, NIH, Prevent & Populat Sci Program, Bethesda, MD 20892 USA
[7] Albert Einstein Coll Med, Dept Epidemiol & Populat Hlth, Bronx, NY 10461 USA
来源
GENOME MEDICINE | 2011年 / 3卷
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
ESTROGEN PLUS PROGESTIN; CONJUGATED EQUINE ESTROGENS; GENOME-WIDE ASSOCIATION; FAT DIETARY PATTERN; FGFR2; GENE; WOMEN; SUSCEPTIBILITY; MAMMOGRAPHY; PREDICTION; BENEFITS;
D O I
10.1186/gm258
中图分类号
Q3 [遗传学];
学科分类号
071007 ; 090102 ;
摘要
Background: Genome-wide association studies have identified several genomic regions that are associated with breast cancer risk, but these provide an explanation for only a small fraction of familial breast cancer aggregation. Genotype by environment interactions may contribute further to such explanation, and may help to refine the genomic regions of interest. Methods: We examined genotypes for 4,988 SNPs, selected from recent genome-wide studies, and four randomized hormonal and dietary interventions among 2,166 women who developed invasive breast cancer during the intervention phase of the Women's Health Initiative (WHI) clinical trial (1993 to 2005), and one-to-one matched controls. These SNPs derive from 3,224 genomic regions having pairwise squared correlation (r(2)) between adjacent regions less than 0.2. Breast cancer and SNP associations were identified using a test statistic that combined evidence of overall association with evidence for SNPs by intervention interaction. Results: The combined 'main effect' and interaction test led to a focus on two genomic regions, the fibroblast growth factor receptor two (FGFR2) and the mitochondrial ribosomal protein S30 (MRPS30) regions. The ranking of SNPs by significance level, based on this combined test, was rather different from that based on the main effect alone, and drew attention to the vicinities of rs3750817 in FGFR2 and rs7705343 in MRPS30. Specifically, rs7705343 was included with several FGFR2 SNPs in a group of SNPs having an estimated false discovery rate < 0.05. In further analyses, there were suggestions (nominal P < 0.05) that hormonal and dietary intervention hazard ratios varied with the number of minor alleles of rs7705343. Conclusions: Genotype by environment interaction information may help to define genomic regions relevant to disease risk. Combined main effect and intervention interaction analyses raise novel hypotheses concerning the MRPS30 genomic region and the effects of hormonal and dietary exposures on postmenopausal breast cancer risk.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Prediction of Breast Cancer Risk Based on Profiling With Common Genetic Variants
    Mavaddat, Nasim
    Pharoah, Paul D. P.
    Michailidou, Kyriaki
    Tyrer, Jonathan
    Brook, Mark N.
    Bolla, Manjeet K.
    Wang, Qin
    Dennis, Joe
    Dunning, Alison M.
    Shah, Mitul
    Luben, Robert
    Brown, Judith
    Bojesen, Stig E.
    Nordestgaard, Borge G.
    Nielsen, Sune F.
    Flyger, Henrik
    Czene, Kamila
    Darabi, Hatef
    Eriksson, Mikael
    Peto, Julian
    dos-Santos-Silva, Isabel
    Dudbridge, Frank
    Johnson, Nichola
    Schmidt, Marjanka K.
    Broeks, Annegien
    Verhoef, Senno
    Rutgers, Emiel J.
    Swerdlow, Anthony
    Ashworth, Alan
    Orr, Nick
    Schoemaker, Minouk J.
    Figueroa, Jonine
    Chanock, Stephen J.
    Brinton, Louise
    Lissowska, Jolanta
    Couch, Fergus J.
    Olson, Janet E.
    Vachon, Celine
    Pankratz, Vernon S.
    Lambrechts, Diether
    Wildiers, Hans
    Van Ongeval, Chantal
    Van Limbergen, Erik
    Kristensen, Vessela
    Alnaes, Grethe Grenaker
    Nord, Silje
    Borresen-Dale, Anne-Lise
    Nevanlinna, Heli
    Muranen, Taru A.
    Aittomaeki, Kristiina
    JNCI-JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 2015, 107 (05):
  • [32] Evaluation of Functional Genetic Variants for Breast Cancer Risk: Results From the Shanghai Breast Cancer Study
    Zhang, Ben
    Beeghly-Fadiel, Alicia
    Lu, Wei
    Cai, Qiuyin
    Xiang, Yong-Bing
    Zheng, Ying
    Long, Jirong
    Ye, Chuanzhong
    Gu, Kai
    Shu, Xiao-Ou
    Gao, Yutang
    Zheng, Wei
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2011, 173 (10) : 1159 - 1170
  • [33] Association of Breast Cancer Susceptibility Variants with Risk of Pancreatic Cancer
    Couch, Fergus J.
    Wang, Xianshu
    McWilliams, Robert R.
    Bamlet, William R.
    de Andrade, Mariza
    Petersen, Gloria M.
    CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY BIOMARKERS & PREVENTION, 2009, 18 (11) : 3044 - 3048
  • [34] Comparing Mammography Abnormality Features to Genetic Variants in the Prediction of Breast Cancer in Women Recommended for Breast Biopsy
    Burnside, Elizabeth S.
    Liu, Jie
    Wu, Yirong
    Onitilo, Adedayo A.
    McCarty, Catherine A.
    Page, C. David
    Peissig, Peggy L.
    Trentham-Dietz, Amy
    Kitchner, Terrie
    Fan, Jun
    Yuan, Ming
    ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY, 2016, 23 (01) : 62 - 69
  • [35] POSTMENOPAUSAL ESTROGEN RECEPTOR POSITIVE BREAST CANCER AND OBESITY ASSOCIATED GENE VARIANTS
    Ozgoz, Asuman
    Icduygu, Fadime Mutlu
    Yukselturk, Aysegul
    Samli, Hale
    Ozturk, Kuyas Hekimler
    Baskan, Zuhal
    Tutuncu, Ilknur
    EXCLI JOURNAL, 2021, 20 : 1133 - 1144
  • [36] INTERACTION OF GENETIC VARIANTS TOWARDS INCREASED CANCER RISK
    Hammad, Seddik
    EXCLI JOURNAL, 2013, 12 : 625 - 627
  • [37] Rare variants in the ATM gene and risk of breast cancer
    Goldgar, David E.
    Healey, Sue
    Dowty, James G.
    Da Silva, Leonard
    Chen, Xiaoqing
    Spurdle, Amanda B.
    Terry, Mary Beth
    Daly, Mary J.
    Buys, Saundra M.
    Southey, Melissa C.
    Andrulis, Irene
    John, Esther M.
    Khanna, Kum Kum
    Hopper, John L.
    Oefner, Peter J.
    Lakhani, Sunil
    Chenevix-Trench, Georgia
    BREAST CANCER RESEARCH, 2011, 13 (04):
  • [38] Association of Common Genetic Variants With Contralateral Breast Cancer Risk in the WECARE Study
    Robson, Mark E.
    Reiner, Anne S.
    Brooks, Jennifer D.
    Concannon, Patrick J.
    John, Esther M.
    Mellemkjaer, Lene
    Bernstein, Leslie
    Malone, Kathleen E.
    Knight, Julia A.
    Lynch, Charles F.
    Woods, Meghan
    Liang, Xiaolin
    Haile, Robert W.
    Duggan, David J.
    Shore, Roy E.
    Smith, Susan A.
    Thomas, Duncan C.
    Stram, Daniel O.
    Bernstein, Jonine L.
    JNCI-JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 2017, 109 (10):
  • [39] Postmenopausal Hormone Therapy is Associated with in Situ Breast Cancer Risk
    Ni, Xiao-Jian
    Xia, Tian-Song
    Zhao, Ying-Chun
    Ma, Jing-Jing
    Zhao, Jie
    Liu, Xiao-An
    Ding, Qiang
    Zha, Xiao-Ming
    Wang, Shui
    ASIAN PACIFIC JOURNAL OF CANCER PREVENTION, 2012, 13 (08) : 3917 - 3925
  • [40] Genetic variants in genes related to inflammation, apoptosis and autophagy in breast cancer risk
    Schuetz, Johanna M.
    Grundy, Anne
    Lee, Derrick G.
    Lai, Agnes S.
    Kobayashi, Lindsay C.
    Richardson, Harriet
    Long, Jirong
    Zheng, Wei
    Aronson, Kristan J.
    Spinelli, John J.
    Brooks-Wilson, Angela R.
    PLOS ONE, 2019, 14 (01):