Genetic variants in the MRPS30 region and postmenopausal breast cancer risk

被引:16
|
作者
Huang, Ying [1 ,2 ]
Ballinger, Dennis G. [3 ]
Dai, James Y. [1 ,2 ]
Peters, Ulrike [1 ,2 ]
Hinds, David A. [4 ]
Cox, David R. [3 ]
Beilharz, Erica [3 ]
Chlebowski, Rowan T. [5 ]
Rossouw, Jacques E. [6 ]
McTiernan, Anne [1 ,2 ]
Rohan, Thomas [7 ]
Prentice, Ross L. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Fred Hutchinson Canc Res Ctr, Div Publ Hlth Sci, Seattle, WA 98109 USA
[2] Fred Hutchinson Canc Res Ctr, Div Vaccine & Infect Dis, Seattle, WA 98109 USA
[3] Perlegen Sci Inc, Mountain View, CA 94043 USA
[4] 23andMe Inc, Mountain View, CA 94043 USA
[5] Harbor UCLA Res & Educ Inst, Div Med Oncol Hematol, Torrance, CA 90502 USA
[6] NHLBI, NIH, Prevent & Populat Sci Program, Bethesda, MD 20892 USA
[7] Albert Einstein Coll Med, Dept Epidemiol & Populat Hlth, Bronx, NY 10461 USA
来源
GENOME MEDICINE | 2011年 / 3卷
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
ESTROGEN PLUS PROGESTIN; CONJUGATED EQUINE ESTROGENS; GENOME-WIDE ASSOCIATION; FAT DIETARY PATTERN; FGFR2; GENE; WOMEN; SUSCEPTIBILITY; MAMMOGRAPHY; PREDICTION; BENEFITS;
D O I
10.1186/gm258
中图分类号
Q3 [遗传学];
学科分类号
071007 ; 090102 ;
摘要
Background: Genome-wide association studies have identified several genomic regions that are associated with breast cancer risk, but these provide an explanation for only a small fraction of familial breast cancer aggregation. Genotype by environment interactions may contribute further to such explanation, and may help to refine the genomic regions of interest. Methods: We examined genotypes for 4,988 SNPs, selected from recent genome-wide studies, and four randomized hormonal and dietary interventions among 2,166 women who developed invasive breast cancer during the intervention phase of the Women's Health Initiative (WHI) clinical trial (1993 to 2005), and one-to-one matched controls. These SNPs derive from 3,224 genomic regions having pairwise squared correlation (r(2)) between adjacent regions less than 0.2. Breast cancer and SNP associations were identified using a test statistic that combined evidence of overall association with evidence for SNPs by intervention interaction. Results: The combined 'main effect' and interaction test led to a focus on two genomic regions, the fibroblast growth factor receptor two (FGFR2) and the mitochondrial ribosomal protein S30 (MRPS30) regions. The ranking of SNPs by significance level, based on this combined test, was rather different from that based on the main effect alone, and drew attention to the vicinities of rs3750817 in FGFR2 and rs7705343 in MRPS30. Specifically, rs7705343 was included with several FGFR2 SNPs in a group of SNPs having an estimated false discovery rate < 0.05. In further analyses, there were suggestions (nominal P < 0.05) that hormonal and dietary intervention hazard ratios varied with the number of minor alleles of rs7705343. Conclusions: Genotype by environment interaction information may help to define genomic regions relevant to disease risk. Combined main effect and intervention interaction analyses raise novel hypotheses concerning the MRPS30 genomic region and the effects of hormonal and dietary exposures on postmenopausal breast cancer risk.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] In silico identification and in vitro evaluation of MRPS30-DT lncRNA and MRPS30 gene expression in breast cancer
    Shirani, Nooshafarin
    Mahdi-Esferizi, Roohallah
    Eshraghi Samani, Reza
    Tahmasebian, Shahram
    Yaghoobi, Hajar
    CANCER REPORTS, 2024, 7 (06)
  • [2] The 5p12 breast cancer susceptibility locus affects MRPS30 expression in estrogen-receptor positive tumors
    Quigley, David A.
    Fiorito, Elisa
    Nord, Silje
    Van Loo, Peter
    Alnaes, Grethe Grenaker
    Fleischer, Thomas
    Tost, Jorg
    Vollan, Hans Kristian Moen
    Tramm, Trine
    Overgaard, Jens
    Bukholm, Ida R.
    Hurtado, Antoni
    Balmain, Allan
    Borresen-Dale, Anne-Lise
    Kristensen, Vessela
    MOLECULAR ONCOLOGY, 2014, 8 (02) : 273 - 284
  • [3] Interactions Between Genetic Variants and Breast Cancer Risk Factors in the Breast and Prostate Cancer Cohort Consortium
    Campa, Daniele
    Kaaks, Rudolf
    Le Marchand, Loic
    Haiman, Christopher A.
    Travis, Ruth C.
    Berg, Christine D.
    Buring, Julie E.
    Chanock, Stephen J.
    Diver, W. Ryan
    Dostal, Lucie
    Fournier, Agnes
    Hankinson, Susan E.
    Henderson, Brian E.
    Hoover, Robert N.
    Isaacs, Claudine
    Johansson, Mattias
    Kolonel, Laurence N.
    Kraft, Peter
    Lee, I-Min
    McCarty, Catherine A.
    Overvad, Kim
    Panico, Salvatore
    Peeters, Petra H. M.
    Riboli, Elio
    Jose Sanchez, Maria
    Schumacher, Fredrick R.
    Skeie, Guri
    Stram, Daniel O.
    Thun, Michael J.
    Trichopoulos, Dimitrios
    Zhang, Shumin
    Ziegler, Regina G.
    Hunter, David J.
    Lindstroem, Sara
    Canzian, Federico
    JNCI-JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 2011, 103 (16): : 1252 - 1263
  • [4] Breast cancer risk assessment using genetic variants and risk factors in a Singapore Chinese population
    Lee, Charmaine Pei Ling
    Irwanto, Astrid
    Salim, Agus
    Yuan, Jian-min
    Liu, Jianjun
    Koh, Woon Puay
    Hartman, Mikael
    BREAST CANCER RESEARCH, 2014, 16 (03)
  • [5] Mammographic Breast Density and Common Genetic Variants in Breast Cancer Risk Prediction
    Lee, Charmaine Pei Ling
    Choi, Hyungwon
    Soo, Khee Chee
    Tan, Min-Han
    Chay, Wen Yee
    Chia, Kee Seng
    Liu, Jenny
    Li, Jingmei
    Hartman, Mikael
    PLOS ONE, 2015, 10 (09):
  • [6] Genetic Variants in the Promoter Region of miR-10b and the Risk of Breast Cancer
    Chen, Jiaping
    Jiang, Yue
    Zhou, Jing
    Liu, Sijun
    Gu, Yayun
    Jin, Guangfu
    Hu, Zhibin
    Ma, Hongxia
    Shen, Hongbing
    Dai, Juncheng
    BIOMED RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL, 2017, 2017
  • [7] Association of common genetic variants with breast cancer risk and clinicopathological characteristics in a Chinese population
    Chan, M.
    Ji, S. M.
    Liaw, C. S.
    Yap, Y. S.
    Law, H. Y.
    Yoon, C. S.
    Wong, C. Y.
    Yong, W. S.
    Wong, N. S.
    Ng, R.
    Ong, K. W.
    Madhukumar, P.
    Oey, C. L.
    Tan, P. H.
    Li, H. H.
    Ang, P.
    Ho, G. H.
    Lee, A. S. G.
    BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2012, 136 (01) : 209 - 220
  • [8] Genetic risk variants associated with in situ breast cancer
    Campa, Daniele
    Barrdahl, Myrto
    Gaudet, Mia M.
    Black, Amanda
    Chanock, Stephen J.
    Diver, W. Ryan
    Gapstur, Susan M.
    Haiman, Christopher
    Hankinson, Susan
    Hazra, Aditi
    Henderson, Brian
    Hoover, Robert N.
    Hunter, David J.
    Joshi, Amit D.
    Kraft, Peter
    Le Marchand, Loic
    Lindstrom, Sara
    Willett, Walter
    Travis, Ruth C.
    Amiano, Pilar
    Siddiq, Afshan
    Trichopoulos, Dimitrios
    Sund, Malin
    Tjonneland, Anne
    Weiderpass, Elisabete
    Peeters, Petra H.
    Panico, Salvatore
    Dossus, Laure
    Ziegler, Regina G.
    Canzian, Federico
    Kaaks, Rudolf
    BREAST CANCER RESEARCH, 2015, 17
  • [9] Genetic variants in lncRNA SRA and risk of breast cancer
    Yan, Rui
    Wang, Kaijuan
    Peng, Rui
    Wang, Shuaibing
    Cao, Jingjing
    Wang, Peng
    Song, Chunhua
    ONCOTARGET, 2016, 7 (16) : 22486 - 22496
  • [10] A Meta-Analysis of the Association between ESR1 Genetic Variants and the Risk of Breast Cancer
    Li, Taishun
    Zhao, Jun
    Yang, Jiaying
    Ma, Xu
    Dai, Qiaoyun
    Huang, Hao
    Wang, Lina
    Liu, Pei
    PLOS ONE, 2016, 11 (04):