Internal Lefort III and monobloc distraction with biodegradable devices

被引:0
|
作者
Cohen, SR [1 ]
Holmes, RE [1 ]
机构
[1] Childrens Hosp & Hlth Care Ctr San Diego, Craniofacial Surg Serv, San Diego, CA USA
来源
3RD INTERNATIONAL CONGRESS ON CRANIAL AND FACIAL BONE DISTRACTION PROCESSES: 2001 DISTRACTION ODYSSEY | 2001年
关键词
midface hypoplasia; distraction osteogenesis; resorbable fixation; LeFort III advancement; monobloc advancement;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
In spite of the many advantages of internal metallic distraction devices, they can be more difficult to remove. By substituting the metallic fixation plates of the Stryker-Leibinger Modular Internal Distraction system, with resorbable MacroPore fixation mesh, only the distractor screw and cable drive need to be removed. Moreover, by utilizing a resorbable stabilizer, the screw and cable components are not needed for the consolidation phase, and can be removed at the completion of active distraction. Herein, 33 patients undergoing internal craniofacial distraction are presented. The MID system was utilized in 21, while a new Macropore, biodegradable distractor was employed in 12. The report documents our results and demonstrates early success with a new type of bioresorbable device. Our initial concept was to link plates and screws to a buried driving device. [1] This, in theory, would permit easy adaptation to almost all anatomic sites and variants. Toward this coal, we worked with Leibinger ultimately developing the Modular Internal Distraction (MID) system (Stryker-Leibinger, Inc., Kalamazoo, MI). [2] The MID system allowed the surgeon to fabricate custom internal distraction devices for virtually any region of the craniofacial skeleton. The first generation system contains expansion screws capable of 15 mm and 30 mm. of distraction. Depending on the distraction site and osteotomy, any configuration of titanium plates could be attached to the distraction screw to permit uniplanar internal distraction. A flexible activation cable is brought out through a distant, inconspicuous stab wound in the hair behind the ear. The MID system has been used extensively. It's primary disadvantage has been the difficulty of removal. We prefer to remove all hardware whenever feasible. Thus, a second operation, which required similar exposure to the first was required for device explantation. To eliminate the difficulty of device removal, we worked with the development team at MacroPore, Inc. (San Diego, CA) to come up with a resorbable design. On November 19, 1999, the first resorbable distractor was employed in a 13 year old boy with hemifacial microsomia to correct severe malar hypoplasia. [3] The device worked well and was easy to remove. Furthermore, because of the development of a new biodegradable stabilization plate, the metallic driving device could be explanted at the conclusion of the distraction period. This permitted rapid and early device removal without the need for complete re-exposure. The biodegradable stabilization plate provided rigid fixation of the advancement, while protecting the underlying, immature bony regenerate. Consolidation was therefore allowed to take place, while eliminating the external cable and the attached metallic distraction screw.
引用
收藏
页码:447 / 454
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Treating Syndromic Craniosynostosis with Monobloc Facial Bipartition and Internal Distractor Devices Destigmatizing the Syndromic Face
    Raposo-Amaral, Cassio Eduardo
    Vieira, Pedro Henrique
    Denadai, Rafael
    Ghizoni, Enrico
    Raposo-Amaral, Cesar Augusto
    CLINICS IN PLASTIC SURGERY, 2021, 48 (03) : 521 - 529
  • [22] LeFort I soft tissue distraction: A hybrid technique
    Wong, GB
    Padwa, BL
    JOURNAL OF CRANIOFACIAL SURGERY, 2002, 13 (04) : 572 - 576
  • [23] Midface distraction osteogenesis: Internal vs. external devices
    Meling, T. R.
    Hogevold, H. -E.
    Due-Tonnessen, B. J.
    Skjelbred, P.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2011, 40 (02) : 139 - 145
  • [24] Exorbitism correction of faciocraniosynostoses by monobloc frontofacial advancement with distraction osteogenesis
    Cruz, Antonio Augusto V.
    Akaishi, Patricia Mitiko S.
    Arnaud, Eric
    Marchac, Daniel
    Renier, Dominique
    JOURNAL OF CRANIOFACIAL SURGERY, 2007, 18 (02) : 355 - 360
  • [25] Fronto-facial monobloc advancement with Rigid External Distraction (RED-II) system
    Nishimoto, S
    Oyama, T
    Shimizu, F
    Tsugawa, T
    Nagashima, T
    Yamamoto, K
    Kamiji, T
    Kanomi, R
    JOURNAL OF CRANIOFACIAL SURGERY, 2004, 15 (01) : 54 - 59
  • [26] Vector Control in Internal Midface Distraction Using Temporary Anchorage Devices
    Francis, Cameron
    Rommer, Elizabeth
    Mancho, Salim
    Carey, Joseph
    Hammoudeh, Jeffrey A.
    Urata, Mark M.
    JOURNAL OF CRANIOFACIAL SURGERY, 2012, 23 : 2000 - 2003
  • [27] Monobloc and midface distraction osteogenesis in pediatric patients with severe syndromal craniosynostosis
    Meling, TR
    Tveten, S
    Due-Tonnessen, BJ
    Skjelbred, P
    Helseth, E
    PEDIATRIC NEUROSURGERY, 2000, 33 (02) : 89 - 94
  • [28] Monobloc Le Fort III Distraction Osteogenesis for Correction of Severe Fronto-orbital and Midface Hypoplasia in Pediatric Crouzon Syndrome
    Hariri, Firdaus
    Cheung, Lim Kwong
    Rahman, Zainal Ariff Abdul
    Mathaneswaran, Vickneswaran
    Ganesan, Dharmendra
    CLEFT PALATE-CRANIOFACIAL JOURNAL, 2016, 53 (01) : 118 - 125
  • [29] An internal distraction device for Le Fort distraction osteogenesis: The NAVID system
    Nakajima, Hideo
    Sakamoto, Yoshiaki
    Tamada, Ikkei
    Ohara, Hirotoshi
    Kishi, Kazuo
    JOURNAL OF PLASTIC RECONSTRUCTIVE AND AESTHETIC SURGERY, 2012, 65 (01) : 61 - 67
  • [30] Maxillary Movement in Distraction Osteogenesis Using Internal Devices in Cleft Palate Patients
    Tomita, Daisuke
    Omura, Susumu
    Ozaki, Shusaku
    Shimazaki, Kazuo
    Fukuyama, Eiji
    Tohnai, Iwai
    Torikai, Katsuyuki
    CLEFT PALATE-CRANIOFACIAL JOURNAL, 2011, 48 (02) : 161 - 166