Internal Lefort III and monobloc distraction with biodegradable devices

被引:0
|
作者
Cohen, SR [1 ]
Holmes, RE [1 ]
机构
[1] Childrens Hosp & Hlth Care Ctr San Diego, Craniofacial Surg Serv, San Diego, CA USA
来源
3RD INTERNATIONAL CONGRESS ON CRANIAL AND FACIAL BONE DISTRACTION PROCESSES: 2001 DISTRACTION ODYSSEY | 2001年
关键词
midface hypoplasia; distraction osteogenesis; resorbable fixation; LeFort III advancement; monobloc advancement;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
In spite of the many advantages of internal metallic distraction devices, they can be more difficult to remove. By substituting the metallic fixation plates of the Stryker-Leibinger Modular Internal Distraction system, with resorbable MacroPore fixation mesh, only the distractor screw and cable drive need to be removed. Moreover, by utilizing a resorbable stabilizer, the screw and cable components are not needed for the consolidation phase, and can be removed at the completion of active distraction. Herein, 33 patients undergoing internal craniofacial distraction are presented. The MID system was utilized in 21, while a new Macropore, biodegradable distractor was employed in 12. The report documents our results and demonstrates early success with a new type of bioresorbable device. Our initial concept was to link plates and screws to a buried driving device. [1] This, in theory, would permit easy adaptation to almost all anatomic sites and variants. Toward this coal, we worked with Leibinger ultimately developing the Modular Internal Distraction (MID) system (Stryker-Leibinger, Inc., Kalamazoo, MI). [2] The MID system allowed the surgeon to fabricate custom internal distraction devices for virtually any region of the craniofacial skeleton. The first generation system contains expansion screws capable of 15 mm and 30 mm. of distraction. Depending on the distraction site and osteotomy, any configuration of titanium plates could be attached to the distraction screw to permit uniplanar internal distraction. A flexible activation cable is brought out through a distant, inconspicuous stab wound in the hair behind the ear. The MID system has been used extensively. It's primary disadvantage has been the difficulty of removal. We prefer to remove all hardware whenever feasible. Thus, a second operation, which required similar exposure to the first was required for device explantation. To eliminate the difficulty of device removal, we worked with the development team at MacroPore, Inc. (San Diego, CA) to come up with a resorbable design. On November 19, 1999, the first resorbable distractor was employed in a 13 year old boy with hemifacial microsomia to correct severe malar hypoplasia. [3] The device worked well and was easy to remove. Furthermore, because of the development of a new biodegradable stabilization plate, the metallic driving device could be explanted at the conclusion of the distraction period. This permitted rapid and early device removal without the need for complete re-exposure. The biodegradable stabilization plate provided rigid fixation of the advancement, while protecting the underlying, immature bony regenerate. Consolidation was therefore allowed to take place, while eliminating the external cable and the attached metallic distraction screw.
引用
收藏
页码:447 / 454
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Craniosynostosis Monobloc Distraction with Internal Device and Its Variant for Infants with Severe Syndromic Craniosynostosis
    Paternoster, Giovanna
    Haber, Samer Elie
    Khonsari, Roman Hossein
    James, Syril
    Arnaud, Eric
    CLINICS IN PLASTIC SURGERY, 2021, 48 (03) : 497 - 506
  • [12] Cleft Lip and Palate LeFort I Distraction with Halo and Hybrid Internal Maxillary Distractors
    Figueroa, Alvaro A.
    Figueroa, Aaron D.
    Burton, Richard G.
    Tragos, Christina
    CLINICS IN PLASTIC SURGERY, 2021, 48 (03) : 391 - 405
  • [13] Management of Midface Deficiency in Syndromic Craniosynostosis with Lefort III Distraction Osteogenesis, Outcomes, and Pitfalls
    Rattan, Vidya
    Sharma, Ramesh Kumar
    Gupta, Akshat
    Singh, Satinder Pal
    Singh, Apoorva
    Jolly, Satnam Singh
    JOURNAL OF MAXILLOFACIAL & ORAL SURGERY, 2024, 23 (06) : 1355 - 1365
  • [14] Respiratory outcome of midface advancement with distraction:: A comparison between Le Fort III and frontofacial monobloc
    Mathijssen, Irene
    Arnaud, Eric
    Marchac, Daniel
    Mireau, Etienne
    Morisseau-Durand, Marie-Paule
    Guerin, Philippe
    Renier, Dominique
    JOURNAL OF CRANIOFACIAL SURGERY, 2006, 17 (04) : 642 - 644
  • [15] Mid-face distraction after LeFort III osteotomy in craniofacial dysmorphism [Mittelgesichtsdistraktion nach LeFort-III-Osteotomie bei kraniofazialen Dysmorphien.]
    Weingart D.
    Roser M.
    Lantos P.
    Mund-, Kiefer- und Gesichtschirurgie, 2001, 5 (4): : 221 - 226
  • [16] Monobloc Frontofacial or Le Fort III Distraction Osteogenesis in Syndromic Craniosynostosis: Three-Dimensional Evaluation of Treatment Outcome and the Need for Central Distraction
    Hu, Ching-Hsuan
    Wu, Chieh-Tsai
    Ko, Ellen Wen-Ching
    Chen, Philip Kuo-Ting
    JOURNAL OF CRANIOFACIAL SURGERY, 2017, 28 (05) : 1344 - 1349
  • [17] Respiratory outcome of mid-face advancement with distraction:: A comparison between Le Fort III and frontofacial monobloc
    Mathijssen, Irene
    Arnaud, Eric
    Marchac, Daniel
    Mireau, Etienne
    Morisseau-Durand, Marie-Paule
    Guerin, Philippe
    Renier, Dominique
    JOURNAL OF CRANIOFACIAL SURGERY, 2006, 17 (05) : 880 - 882
  • [18] A Rare Orbital Complication of Eye Exodeviation With Limited Abduction During Monobloc Le Fort III Distraction Osteogenesis
    Hariri, Firdaus
    Cheung, Lim Kwong
    Rahman, Zainal Ariff Bin Abdul
    Ramasamy, Sundrarajan Naidu
    Ganesan, Dharmendra
    Surg, M.
    CLEFT PALATE-CRANIOFACIAL JOURNAL, 2015, 52 (04) : 489 - 493
  • [19] Monobloc distraction osteogenesis in pediatric patients with severe syndromal craniosynostosis
    Meling, TR
    Due-Tonnessen, BJ
    Hogevold, HE
    Skjelbred, P
    Arctander, K
    JOURNAL OF CRANIOFACIAL SURGERY, 2004, 15 (06) : 990 - 1000
  • [20] Advances in the Treatment of Syndromic Midface Hypoplasia Using Monobloc and Facial Bipartition Distraction Osteogenesis
    Kumar, Anand R.
    Steinbacher, Derek
    SEMINARS IN PLASTIC SURGERY, 2014, 28 (04) : 179 - 183