Barriers, Facilitators, and Suggested Interventions for Lung Cancer Screening Among a Rural Screening-Eligible Population

被引:20
|
作者
Schiffelbein, Jenna E. [1 ,2 ]
Carluzzo, Kathleen L. [2 ]
Hasson, Rian M. [2 ,3 ]
Alford-Teaster, Jennifer A. [1 ,2 ]
Imset, Inger [1 ,2 ]
Onega, Tracy [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Hitchcock Norris Cotton Canc Ctr, One Med Ctr Dr,Hinman Box 7920, Lebanon, NH 03756 USA
[2] Dartmouth Coll, Geisel Sch Med, Hanover, NH 03755 USA
[3] Dartmouth Hitchcock Med Ctr, Lebanon, NH 03766 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
lung cancer; lung cancer screening; rural; rural health; tobacco; smoking; PRIMARY-CARE PROVIDERS; METROPOLITAN COUNTIES; UNITED-STATES; COMMUNITY; NONMETROPOLITAN; PERCEPTIONS; GUIDELINES; MORTALITY; KNOWLEDGE; ATTITUDES;
D O I
10.1177/2150132720930544
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Introduction: Rural areas are disproportionally affected by lung cancer late-stage incidence and mortality. Lung cancer screening (LCS) is recommended to find lung cancer early and reduce mortality, yet uptake is low. The purpose of this study was to elucidate the barriers to, facilitators of, and suggested interventions for increasing LCS among a rural screening-eligible population using a mixed methods concurrent embedded design study. Methods: Qualitative and quantitative data were collected from rural-residing adults who met the eligibility criteria for LCS but who were not up-to-date with LCS recommendations. Study participants (n = 23) took part in 1 of 5 focus groups and completed a survey. Focus group discussions were recorded, transcribed, and coded through a mixed deductive and inductive approach. Survey data were used to enhance and clarify focus group results; these data were integrated in the design and during analysis, in accordance with the mixed methods concurrent embedded design approach. Results: Several key barriers to LCS were identified, including an overall lack of knowledge about LCS, not receiving information or recommendation from a health care provider, and lack of transportation. Key facilitators were receiving a provider recommendation and high motivation to know the screening results. Participants suggested that LCS uptake could be increased by addressing provider understanding and recommendation of LCS and conducting community outreach to promote LCS awareness and access. Conclusion: The results suggest that the rural screening-eligible population is generally receptive to LCS. Patient-level factors important to getting this population screened include knowledge, transportation, motivation to know their screening results, and receiving information or recommendation from a provider. Addressing these factors may be important to increase rural LCS uptake.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Barriers to and facilitators of prostate cancer screening among men in Uganda prisons
    Atuhe, Innocent
    Jatho, Alfred
    Nalwadda, Babra
    Basaza-Ejiri, Annabella Habinka
    Atuyambe, Lynn
    Orem, Jackson
    ECANCERMEDICALSCIENCE, 2023, 17
  • [32] Barriers and Facilitators of Prostate Cancer Screening Among Filipino Men in Hawaii
    Conde, Francisco A.
    Landier, Wendy
    Ishida, Dianne
    Bell, Rose
    Cuaresma, Charlene F.
    Misola, Jane
    ONCOLOGY NURSING FORUM, 2011, 38 (02) : 227 - 233
  • [33] Colorectal Cancer Screening Among South Asians: Focus Group Findings on Attitudes, Knowledge, Barriers and Facilitators
    Ivey, Susan L.
    Mukherjea, Arnab
    Patel, Aashna
    Kapoor, Nilesh
    Rau, Sameeha
    Kazi, Eiman
    Bhatia, Jaskirat
    Somsouk, Ma
    Tseng, Winston
    JOURNAL OF HEALTH CARE FOR THE POOR AND UNDERSERVED, 2018, 29 (04) : 1416 - 1437
  • [34] Colorectal cancer screening barriers and facilitators among Jordanians: A cross-sectional study
    Jadallah, Khaled
    Khatatbeh, Moawiah
    Mazahreh, Tagleb
    Sweidan, Aroob
    Ghareeb, Razan
    Tawalbeh, Aya
    Masaadeh, Ansam
    Alzubi, Bara
    Khader, Yousef
    PREVENTIVE MEDICINE REPORTS, 2023, 32
  • [35] Barriers and facilitators to anal cancer screening among people living with HIV in Puerto Rico
    Cruz, Gabriela
    Ramos-Cartagena, Jeslie M.
    Torres-Russe, Jose L.
    Colon-Lopez, Vivian
    Ortiz-Ortiz, Karen J.
    Pericchi, Luis
    Deshmukh, Ashish A.
    Ortiz, Ana Patricia
    BMC PUBLIC HEALTH, 2023, 23 (01)
  • [36] Physician-office vs home uptake of colorectal cancer screening using FOBT/FIT among screening-eligible US adults
    Chido-Amajuoyi, Onyema Greg
    Sharma, Anushree
    Talluri, Rajesh
    Tami-Maury, Irene
    Shete, Sanjay
    CANCER MEDICINE, 2019, 8 (17): : 7408 - 7418
  • [37] Barriers to and Facilitators of Cervical Cancer Screening among Women in Southeast Asia: A Systematic Review
    Chua, Brandon
    Ma, Viva
    Asjes, Caitlin
    Lim, Ashley
    Mohseni, Mahsa
    Wee, Hwee Lin
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2021, 18 (09)
  • [38] Disparities in lung cancer screening rates among the Hispanic/LatinX population
    Olazagasti, Coral
    Seetharamu, Nagashree
    LUNG CANCER MANAGEMENT, 2021, 10 (03)
  • [39] Understanding the perceived benefits, barriers, and cues to action for lung cancer screening among Latinos: A qualitative study
    Alaniz-Cantu, Edgar I.
    Goodwin, Kalese
    Smith, London
    Acosta, Eliany
    Chavez-Iniguez, Arlette
    Evans, Mary Jo
    Gaitan, Marcela
    Lei, Fang
    Yousefi-Nooraie, Reza
    Fiscella, Kevin A.
    Rivera, M. Patricia
    Cupertino, Ana Paula
    Cartujano-Barrera, Francisco
    FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2024, 14
  • [40] Barriers and facilitators of colorectal cancer screening access
    Schenfeld, Yamila
    Schernenco, Joel
    Bellando, Maria Belen
    Robles, Manuel
    Picardi, Gonzalo
    Danieli, Inaki M. Dopazo
    Albanesi, Lucia
    Reig, Maria Ernestina
    Esandi, Maria Eugenia
    Bruzzone, Ariana
    MEDICINA-BUENOS AIRES, 2024, 84 (02) : 267 - 278