Barriers, Facilitators, and Suggested Interventions for Lung Cancer Screening Among a Rural Screening-Eligible Population

被引:20
|
作者
Schiffelbein, Jenna E. [1 ,2 ]
Carluzzo, Kathleen L. [2 ]
Hasson, Rian M. [2 ,3 ]
Alford-Teaster, Jennifer A. [1 ,2 ]
Imset, Inger [1 ,2 ]
Onega, Tracy [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Hitchcock Norris Cotton Canc Ctr, One Med Ctr Dr,Hinman Box 7920, Lebanon, NH 03756 USA
[2] Dartmouth Coll, Geisel Sch Med, Hanover, NH 03755 USA
[3] Dartmouth Hitchcock Med Ctr, Lebanon, NH 03766 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
lung cancer; lung cancer screening; rural; rural health; tobacco; smoking; PRIMARY-CARE PROVIDERS; METROPOLITAN COUNTIES; UNITED-STATES; COMMUNITY; NONMETROPOLITAN; PERCEPTIONS; GUIDELINES; MORTALITY; KNOWLEDGE; ATTITUDES;
D O I
10.1177/2150132720930544
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Introduction: Rural areas are disproportionally affected by lung cancer late-stage incidence and mortality. Lung cancer screening (LCS) is recommended to find lung cancer early and reduce mortality, yet uptake is low. The purpose of this study was to elucidate the barriers to, facilitators of, and suggested interventions for increasing LCS among a rural screening-eligible population using a mixed methods concurrent embedded design study. Methods: Qualitative and quantitative data were collected from rural-residing adults who met the eligibility criteria for LCS but who were not up-to-date with LCS recommendations. Study participants (n = 23) took part in 1 of 5 focus groups and completed a survey. Focus group discussions were recorded, transcribed, and coded through a mixed deductive and inductive approach. Survey data were used to enhance and clarify focus group results; these data were integrated in the design and during analysis, in accordance with the mixed methods concurrent embedded design approach. Results: Several key barriers to LCS were identified, including an overall lack of knowledge about LCS, not receiving information or recommendation from a health care provider, and lack of transportation. Key facilitators were receiving a provider recommendation and high motivation to know the screening results. Participants suggested that LCS uptake could be increased by addressing provider understanding and recommendation of LCS and conducting community outreach to promote LCS awareness and access. Conclusion: The results suggest that the rural screening-eligible population is generally receptive to LCS. Patient-level factors important to getting this population screened include knowledge, transportation, motivation to know their screening results, and receiving information or recommendation from a provider. Addressing these factors may be important to increase rural LCS uptake.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Lung Cancer Screening in a Surgical Lung Cancer Population: Analysis of a Rural, Quaternary, Academic Experience
    Hasson, Rian M.
    Phillips, Joseph D.
    Fay, Kayla A.
    Millington, Timothy M.
    Finley, David J.
    JOURNAL OF SURGICAL RESEARCH, 2021, 262 : 14 - 20
  • [22] A population survey on beliefs around cervical cancer screening: determining the barriers and facilitators associated with attendance
    Judah, Gaby
    Dilib, Faisal
    Darzi, Ara
    Huf, Sarah
    BMC CANCER, 2022, 22 (01)
  • [23] Barriers and Facilitators of Colorectal Cancer Screening for Patients of Rural Accountable Care Organization Clinics: A Multilevel Analysis
    Wang, Hongmei
    Qiu, Fang
    Gregg, Abbey
    Chen, Baojiang
    Kim, Jungyoon
    Young, Lufei
    Wan, Neng
    Chen, Li-Wu
    JOURNAL OF RURAL HEALTH, 2018, 34 (02) : 202 - 212
  • [24] Facilitators of and Barriers to Gastric Cancer Screening Among Korean Americans
    Sin, Mo-Kyung
    Kim, Il-Ho
    CANCER NURSING, 2017, 40 (04) : E59 - E65
  • [25] Barriers to lung cancer screening
    Rehman, Sameer
    Lim, Mike
    Sidhu, Ranjit
    Ramis, Phil
    Rohren, Eric
    CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2025, 94
  • [26] Perspectives of Screening-Eligible Women and Male Partners on Benefits of and Barriers to Treatment for Precancerous Lesions and Cervical Cancer in Kenya
    Ragan, Kathleen R.
    Lunsford, Natasha Buchanan
    Smith, Judith Lee
    Saraiya, Mona
    Aketch, Millicent
    ONCOLOGIST, 2018, 23 (01) : 35 - 43
  • [27] Geographic access to lung cancer screening among eligible adults living in rural and urban environments in the United States
    Sahar, Liora
    Wills, Vanhvilai L. Douangchai
    Liu, Ka Kit
    Fedewa, Stacey A.
    Rosenthal, Lauren
    Kazerooni, Ella A.
    Dyer, Debra S.
    Smith, Robert A.
    CANCER, 2022, 128 (08) : 1584 - 1594
  • [28] National Cancer Institute Smoking Cessation at Lung Examination Trials Brief Report: Baseline Characteristics and Comparison With the U.S. General Population of Lung Cancer Screening-Eligible Patients
    Meza, Rafael
    Jeon, Jihyoun
    Jimenez-Mendoza, Evelyn
    Mok, Yoonseo
    Cao, Pianpian
    Foley, Kristie L.
    Chiles, Caroline
    Ostroff, Jamie S.
    Cinciripini, Paul M.
    Minnix, Jennifer
    Rigotti, Nancy A.
    Haas, Jennifer S.
    Taylor, Kathryn
    Williams, Randi M.
    Toll, Benjamin A.
    Joseph, Anne M.
    JTO CLINICAL AND RESEARCH REPORTS, 2022, 3 (07):
  • [29] Real-world lung cancer screening decision-making: Barriers and facilitators
    Lowenstein, Margaret
    Vijayaraghavan, Maya
    Burke, Nancy J.
    Karliner, Leah
    Wang, Sunny
    Peters, Melissa
    Lozano, Amy
    Kaplan, Celia P.
    LUNG CANCER, 2019, 133 : 32 - 37
  • [30] Barriers and Facilitators to Informed Decision-Making About Prostate Cancer Screening Among Black Men
    Shungu, Nicholas
    Sterba, Katherine R.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN BOARD OF FAMILY MEDICINE, 2021, 34 (05) : 925 - 936