Barriers, Facilitators, and Suggested Interventions for Lung Cancer Screening Among a Rural Screening-Eligible Population

被引:20
|
作者
Schiffelbein, Jenna E. [1 ,2 ]
Carluzzo, Kathleen L. [2 ]
Hasson, Rian M. [2 ,3 ]
Alford-Teaster, Jennifer A. [1 ,2 ]
Imset, Inger [1 ,2 ]
Onega, Tracy [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Hitchcock Norris Cotton Canc Ctr, One Med Ctr Dr,Hinman Box 7920, Lebanon, NH 03756 USA
[2] Dartmouth Coll, Geisel Sch Med, Hanover, NH 03755 USA
[3] Dartmouth Hitchcock Med Ctr, Lebanon, NH 03766 USA
来源
JOURNAL OF PRIMARY CARE AND COMMUNITY HEALTH | 2020年 / 11卷
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
lung cancer; lung cancer screening; rural; rural health; tobacco; smoking; PRIMARY-CARE PROVIDERS; METROPOLITAN COUNTIES; UNITED-STATES; COMMUNITY; NONMETROPOLITAN; PERCEPTIONS; GUIDELINES; MORTALITY; KNOWLEDGE; ATTITUDES;
D O I
10.1177/2150132720930544
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Introduction: Rural areas are disproportionally affected by lung cancer late-stage incidence and mortality. Lung cancer screening (LCS) is recommended to find lung cancer early and reduce mortality, yet uptake is low. The purpose of this study was to elucidate the barriers to, facilitators of, and suggested interventions for increasing LCS among a rural screening-eligible population using a mixed methods concurrent embedded design study. Methods: Qualitative and quantitative data were collected from rural-residing adults who met the eligibility criteria for LCS but who were not up-to-date with LCS recommendations. Study participants (n = 23) took part in 1 of 5 focus groups and completed a survey. Focus group discussions were recorded, transcribed, and coded through a mixed deductive and inductive approach. Survey data were used to enhance and clarify focus group results; these data were integrated in the design and during analysis, in accordance with the mixed methods concurrent embedded design approach. Results: Several key barriers to LCS were identified, including an overall lack of knowledge about LCS, not receiving information or recommendation from a health care provider, and lack of transportation. Key facilitators were receiving a provider recommendation and high motivation to know the screening results. Participants suggested that LCS uptake could be increased by addressing provider understanding and recommendation of LCS and conducting community outreach to promote LCS awareness and access. Conclusion: The results suggest that the rural screening-eligible population is generally receptive to LCS. Patient-level factors important to getting this population screened include knowledge, transportation, motivation to know their screening results, and receiving information or recommendation from a provider. Addressing these factors may be important to increase rural LCS uptake.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Lung cancer screening use among screening-eligible adults with disabilities
    Poghosyan, Hermine
    Richman, Ilana
    Sarkar, Sayantani
    Presley, Carolyn J.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN GERIATRICS SOCIETY, 2024, 72 (04) : 1155 - 1165
  • [2] Barriers and facilitators to uptake of lung cancer screening: A mixed methods systematic review
    Lin, Yu-an
    Hong, Yu Ting
    Lin, Xiu Jing
    Lin, Jia Ling
    Xiao, Hui Min
    Huang, Fei Fei
    LUNG CANCER, 2022, 172 : 9 - 18
  • [3] Facilitators and Barriers to Implementation of Lung Cancer Screening: A Framework-Driven Systematic Review
    Sedani, Ami E.
    Davis, Olivia C.
    Clifton, Shari C.
    Campbell, Janis E.
    Chou, Ann F.
    JNCI-JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 2022, 114 (11): : 1449 - 1467
  • [4] Rural barriers to early lung cancer detection: Exploring access to lung cancer screening programs in New Hampshire and Vermont
    Hasson, Rian M.
    Fay, Kayla A.
    Phillips, Joseph D.
    Millington, Timothy M.
    Finley, David J.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2021, 221 (04): : 725 - 730
  • [5] Rural barriers and facilitators of lung cancer screening program implementation in the veterans health administration: a qualitative study
    Lewis, Jennifer A.
    Bonnet, Kemberlee
    Schlundt, David G.
    Byerly, Susan
    Lindsell, Christopher J.
    Henschke, Claudia I.
    Yankelevitz, David F.
    York, Sally J.
    Hendler, Fred
    Dittus, Robert S.
    Vogus, Timothy J.
    Kripalani, Sunil
    Moghanaki, Drew
    Audet, Carolyn M.
    Roumie, Christianne L.
    Spalluto, Lucy B.
    FRONTIERS IN HEALTH SERVICES, 2023, 3
  • [6] Low Prevalence of Endoscopic Screening for Barrett's Esophagus in a Screening-Eligible Primary Care Population
    Eluri, Swathi
    Reddy, Sumana
    Ketchem, Corey C.
    Tappata, Manaswita
    Nettles, Hanna G.
    Watts, Ariel E.
    Cotton, Cary C.
    Dellon, Evan S.
    Shaheen, Nicholas J.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2022, 117 (11): : 1764 - 1771
  • [7] Attitudes Toward Colorectal Cancer Screening in the Digital Age: A Survey of Practices and Attitudes among Screening-Eligible Alabamians
    Perkins, Allen
    Nicholls, Keith
    Shaw, Thomas
    Liu, Gerald
    Molokhia, Ehab
    SOUTHERN MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2013, 106 (08) : 462 - 467
  • [8] Barriers and facilitators of colorectal cancer screening in Asia
    Hatamian, Sare
    Hadavandsiri, Fatemeh
    Momenimovahed, Zohre
    Salehiniya, Hamid
    ECANCERMEDICALSCIENCE, 2021, 15
  • [9] Understanding barriers to lung cancer screening in primary care
    Coughlin, Julia M.
    Zang, Yanyu
    Terranella, Samantha
    Alex, Gillian
    Karush, Justin
    Geissen, Nicole
    Chmielewski, Gary W.
    Arndt, Andrew T.
    Liptay, Michael J.
    Zimmermann, Laura J.
    Dowling, Linda
    Leyitan, Ashley
    Seder, Christopher W.
    JOURNAL OF THORACIC DISEASE, 2020, 12 (05) : 2536 - +
  • [10] Lung cancer screening among the smoker population
    Coureau, Gaelle
    Delva, Fleur
    BULLETIN DU CANCER, 2019, 106 (7-8) : 693 - 702