A comparative study of local galaxy clusters - II. X-ray and SZ scaling relations

被引:40
|
作者
Rozo, E. [1 ,2 ]
Evrard, A. E. [3 ,4 ]
Rykoff, E. S. [5 ,6 ]
Bartlett, J. G. [7 ,8 ]
机构
[1] Univ Chicago, Dept Astron & Astrophys, Chicago, IL 60637 USA
[2] Kavli Inst Cosmol Phys, Chicago, IL 60637 USA
[3] Univ Michigan, Dept Phys & Astron, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[4] Univ Michigan, Michigan Ctr Theoret Phys, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[5] SLAC Natl Accelerator Lab, Menlo Pk, CA 94025 USA
[6] Univ Calif Berkeley, Lawrence Berkeley Natl Lab, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA
[7] Univ Paris Diderot, APC, Observ Paris, CNRS,IN2P3,CEA,Irfu,Sorbonne Paris Cite, Paris 13, France
[8] CALTECH, Jet Prop Lab, Pasadena, CA USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会; 美国国家航空航天局;
关键词
galaxies:; clusters:; general; OBSERVED GROWTH; MASS; SCATTER; SAMPLE; COSMOLOGY; EVOLUTION; SIMULATIONS; CONSTRAINTS; RICHNESS; CATALOG;
D O I
10.1093/mnras/stt2160
中图分类号
P1 [天文学];
学科分类号
0704 ;
摘要
We compare cluster scaling relations published for three different samples selected via X-ray and Sunyaev-Zel'dovich (SZ) signatures. We find tensions driven mainly by two factors: (i) systematic differences in the X-ray cluster observables used to derive the scaling relations and (ii) uncertainty in the modelling of how the gas mass of galaxy clusters scales with total mass. All scaling relations are in agreement after accounting for these two effects. We describe a multivariate scaling model that enables a fully self-consistent treatment of multiple observational catalogues in the presence of property covariance and apply this formalism when interpreting published results. The corrections due to scatter and observable covariance can be significant. For instance, our predicted Y-SZ-L-X scaling relation differs from that derived using the naive 'plug in' method by approximate to 25 per cent. Finally, we test the mass normalization for each of the X-ray data sets we consider by applying a space density consistency test: we compare the observed ROSAT-ESO Flux-Limited X-ray (REFLEX) luminosity function to expectations from published L-X-M relations convolved with the mass function for a Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe 7 flat Lambda cold dark matter model.
引用
收藏
页码:62 / 77
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The generalized scaling relations for X-ray galaxy clusters: the most powerful mass proxy
    Ettori, S.
    MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY, 2013, 435 (02) : 1265 - 1277
  • [2] The MUSIC of galaxy clusters - II. X-ray global properties and scaling relations
    Biffi, V.
    Sembolini, F.
    De Petris, M.
    Valdarnini, R.
    Yepes, G.
    Gottloeber, S.
    MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY, 2014, 439 (01) : 588 - 603
  • [3] The physics inside the scaling relations for X-ray galaxy clusters: gas dumpiness, gas mass fraction and slope of the pressure profile
    Ettori, S.
    MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY, 2015, 446 (03) : 2629 - 2639
  • [4] A comparative study of local galaxy clusters - I. Derived X-ray observables
    Rozo, E.
    Rykoff, E. S.
    Bartlett, J. G.
    Evrard, A.
    MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY, 2014, 438 (01) : 49 - 61
  • [5] Effects of selection and covariance on X-ray scaling relations of galaxy clusters
    Nord, B.
    Stanek, R.
    Rasia, E.
    Evrard, A. E.
    MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY, 2008, 383 (01) : L10 - L14
  • [6] Testing for evolution in scaling relations of galaxy clusters: cross analysis between X-ray and SZ observations
    Ferramacho, L. D.
    Blanchard, A.
    ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS, 2011, 533
  • [7] SZ/X-ray scaling relations using X-ray data and Planck Nominal maps
    De Martino, I.
    Atrio-Barandela, F.
    MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY, 2016, 461 (03) : 3222 - 3232
  • [8] SZ Scaling Relations of Galaxy Groups and Clusters Near the North Ecliptic Pole
    Pratt, Cameron T.
    Bregman, Joel N.
    ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL, 2020, 890 (02)
  • [9] Planck early results. X. Statistical analysis of Sunyaev-Zeldovich scaling relations for X-ray galaxy clusters
    Aghanim, N.
    Arnaud, M.
    Ashdown, M.
    Aumont, J.
    Baccigalupi, C.
    Balbi, A.
    Banday, A. J.
    Barreiro, R. B.
    Bartelmann, M.
    Bartlett, J. G.
    Battaner, E.
    Benabed, K.
    Benoit, A.
    Bernard, J. -P.
    Bersanelli, M.
    Bhatia, R.
    Bock, J. J.
    Bonaldi, A.
    Bond, J. R.
    Borrill, J.
    Bouchet, F. R.
    Brown, M. L.
    Bucher, M.
    Burigana, C.
    Cabella, P.
    Cardoso, J. -F.
    Catalano, A.
    Cayon, L.
    Challinor, A.
    Chamballu, A.
    Chary, R. -R.
    Chiang, L. -Y
    Chiang, C.
    Chon, G.
    Christensen, P. R.
    Churazov, E.
    Clements, D. L.
    Colafrancesco, S.
    Colombi, S.
    Couchot, F.
    Coulais, A.
    Crill, B. P.
    Cuttaia, F.
    Da Silva, A.
    Dahle, H.
    Danese, L.
    de Bernardis, P.
    de Gasperis, G.
    de Rosa, A.
    de Zotti, G.
    ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS, 2011, 536
  • [10] Observational constraints on the redshift evolution of X-ray scaling relations of galaxy clusters out to z ∼ 1.5
    Reichert, A.
    Boehringer, H.
    Fassbender, R.
    Muehlegger, M.
    ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS, 2011, 535