Strategies to retain rural breast cancer survivors in longitudinal research

被引:14
作者
Meneses, Karen M. [1 ]
Benz, Rachel L. [1 ]
Hassey, Lauren A. [1 ]
Yang, Ziqin Q. [2 ]
McNees, M. Patrick [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Alabama Birmingham, Sch Nursing, Birmingham, AL 35294 USA
[2] Univ Alabama Birmingham, Sch Hlth Profess, Birmingham, AL 35294 USA
关键词
Rural; Breast cancer; Survivors; Retention; Attrition; RECRUITMENT; INTERVENTION; ATTRITION; RETENTION; TRIAL; WOMEN;
D O I
10.1016/j.apnr.2013.08.001
中图分类号
R47 [护理学];
学科分类号
1011 ;
摘要
Aims: To describe the retention of rural women in the Rural Breast Cancer Survivors (RBCS) Intervention. Background: Few studies describe strategies and procedures for retention of participants enrolled in cancer research. Fewer studies focus on underserved rural cancer survivors. Methods: A descriptive design was used. A conceptual model of retention based on three factors: researcher, participant, and context with primary, secondary, and tertiary strategies was used to unify the data. Results: 432 women enrolled in the RBCS study, of which 332 (77%) were retained and completed the 12 month study. Favorable retention strategies included: run-in period, persistent attempts to re-contact hard to reach, recruitment and enrollment tracking database, and a trusting and supportive relationship with the research nurse. Conclusion: A conceptual model of retention with differential strategies can maintain participant retention in a longitudinal research study. (C) 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:257 / 262
页数:6
相关论文
共 16 条
[1]   Psychosocial intervention for rural women with breast cancer - The Sierra Stanford Partnership [J].
Angell, KL ;
Kreshka, MA ;
McCoy, R ;
Donnelly, P ;
Turner-Cobb, JM ;
Graddy, K ;
Kraemer, HC ;
Koopman, C .
JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2003, 18 (07) :499-507
[2]  
Computing R. F. F. S., 2008, R STAT SOFTW V2 15 0
[3]   Scientific Bias Arising from Sampling, Selective Recruitment, and Attrition: The Case for Improved Reporting [J].
Demark-Wahnefried, Wendy ;
Bowen, Deborah J. ;
Jabson, Jennifer M. ;
Paskett, Electra D. .
CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY BIOMARKERS & PREVENTION, 2011, 20 (03) :415-418
[4]   A systematic review highlights threats to validity in studies of barriers to cancer trial participation [J].
Fayter, Debra ;
McDaid, Catriona ;
Eastwood, Alison .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2007, 60 (10) :990-1001
[5]   Assessing the non-random sampling effects of subject attrition in longitudinal research [J].
Goodman, JS ;
Blum, TC .
JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT, 1996, 22 (04) :627-652
[6]   Attrition and retention of ethnically diverse subjects in a multicenter randomized controlled research trial [J].
Janson, SL ;
Alioto, ME ;
Boushey, HA .
CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIALS, 2001, 22 (06) :236S-243S
[7]   Testing the Feasibility of a Culturally Tailored Breast Cancer Screening Intervention with Native Hawaiian Women in Rural Churches [J].
Ka'opua, Lana Sue I. ;
Park, Soon H. ;
Ward, Margaret E. ;
Braun, Kathryn L. .
HEALTH & SOCIAL WORK, 2011, 36 (01) :55-65
[8]   Effect of Telecare Management on Pain and Depression in Patients With Cancer A Randomized Trial [J].
Kroenke, Kurt ;
Theobald, Dale ;
Wu, Jingwei ;
Norton, Kelli ;
Morrison, Gwendolyn ;
Carpenter, Janet ;
Tu, Wanzhu .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2010, 304 (02) :163-171
[9]   CONSORT 2010 explanation and elaboration: Updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials [J].
Moher, David ;
Hopewell, Sally ;
Schulz, Kenneth F. ;
Montori, Victor ;
Gotzsche, Peter C. ;
Devereaux, P. J. ;
Elbourne, Diana ;
Egger, Matthias ;
Altman, Douglas G. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2012, 10 (01) :28-55
[10]   Improving Subject Recruitment, Retention, and Participation in Research through Peplau's Theory of Interpersonal Relations [J].
Penckofer, Sue ;
Byrn, Mary ;
Mumby, Patricia ;
Ferrans, Carol Estwing .
NURSING SCIENCE QUARTERLY, 2011, 24 (02) :146-151