Psychological flexibility: A psychological mechanism that contributes to persistent symptoms following mild traumatic brain injury?

被引:13
|
作者
Faulkner, Josh W. [1 ,4 ]
Theadom, Alice [1 ]
Mahon, Susan [1 ,4 ]
Snell, Deborah L. [2 ]
Barker-Collo, Suzanne [3 ]
Cunningham, Kay [4 ]
机构
[1] Auckland Univ Technol, Univ Technol, TBI Network, 90 Akoranga Dr, Auckland, New Zealand
[2] Univ Otago, 2 Riccarton Ave, Christchurch 8011, New Zealand
[3] Auckland Univ, Auckland CDB, Auckland 1010, New Zealand
[4] Wakefield Specialist Ctr, Proact Rehab, Florence St, Wellington 6021, New Zealand
关键词
Mild traumatic brain injury; Psychological flexibility; Post-concussion symptoms; Recovery; DEFAULT MODE NETWORK; POST-CONCUSSION SYNDROME; FEAR-AVOIDANCE MODEL; MINOR HEAD-INJURY; POSTCONCUSSION SYNDROME; COMMITMENT THERAPY; RISK-FACTORS; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL OUTCOMES; EXPERIENTIAL AVOIDANCE; POSTTRAUMATIC-STRESS;
D O I
10.1016/j.mehy.2020.110141
中图分类号
R-3 [医学研究方法]; R3 [基础医学];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
Persistent symptoms following a mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) can have profound implications on all aspects of an individual's functioning. Psychological factors have a significant role in contributing to the development of persistent post-concussion symptoms and predicting outcomes. Biopsychosocial explanations have therefore been applied to prognostic models of mTBI. What is not evident in the literature to date is an understanding of the psychological mechanisms that may be important in mediating the various psychological factors in these models. The construct of psychological flexibility holds promise in this regard. Psychological flexibility is the ability to act in alignment with values in the presence of inner discomfort such as pain and distress. It is hypothesised that psychological flexibility has a significant role in the development and maintenance of persistent symptoms following mild traumatic brain injury. The rationale that forms the basis of this hypothesis is as follows: a relationship exists between psychological flexibility and pre-injury psychological risk factors; psychological flexibility is vulnerable to the pathophysiology associated with mTBI; post-injury psychological and neuropsychological factors exacerbate and maintain psychological inflexibility; and psychological flexibility underlies psychological responses to mTBI that contribute to unfavourable outcomes. A discussion of the literature that pertains to each of these points is presented. Based on this hypothesis, we conclude, that there is rationale to empirically explore the role of psychological flexibility in mTBI and its relationship to outcomes. This may also lead to evaluation of specific interventions that target this psychological mechanism in mTBI, such as Acceptance and Commitment Therapy, and improve outcomes for this population.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Prevalence and structure of symptoms at 3 months after mild traumatic brain injury in a national cohort
    Lannsjo, Marianne
    Af Geijerstam, Jean-Luc
    Johansson, Ulla
    Bring, Johan
    Borg, Jorgen
    BRAIN INJURY, 2009, 23 (03) : 213 - 219
  • [42] Vestibular Assessment in Patients with Persistent Symptoms of Mild Traumatic Brain Injury
    Sadegh Jafarzadeh
    Akram Pourbakht
    Eshagh Bahrami
    Indian Journal of Otolaryngology and Head & Neck Surgery, 2022, 74 : 272 - 280
  • [43] Prognostic factors for persistent symptoms in adults with mild traumatic brain injury: protocol for an overview of systematic reviews
    Dery, Julien
    De Guise, Elaine
    Bussieres, Eve-Line
    Lamontagne, Marie-Eve
    SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2021, 10 (01)
  • [44] Peritraumatic Psychological Distress and Mild Traumatic Brain Injury Symptoms (MTBI) are Associated in the Early Aftermath of Trauma
    Goetzinger, Amy M.
    Orrey, Danielle
    Lee, Young M.
    Platts-Mills, Timothy F.
    Bortsov, Andrey
    Swor, Robert
    Peak, David
    Jones, Jeffrey
    Rathlev, Niels
    Lee, David
    Domeier, Robert
    Hendry, Phyllis
    Liberzon, Israel
    McLean, Samuel A.
    BIOLOGICAL PSYCHIATRY, 2012, 71 (08) : 75S - 75S
  • [45] Effect of Mild Traumatic Brain Injury and Demographic Factors on Psychological Outcome
    Shafiei, Elham
    Fakharian, Esmaeil
    Omidi, Abdollah
    Akbari, Hossein
    Delpisheh, Ali
    ARCHIVES OF TRAUMA RESEARCH, 2016, 5 (02)
  • [46] Metacognitive Therapy for People Experiencing Persistent Post-Concussion Symptoms Following Mild Traumatic Brain Injury: A Preliminary Multiple Case-Series Study
    Rauwenhoff, Johanne C. C.
    Hagen, Roger
    Karaliute, Migle
    Hjemdal, Odin
    Kennair, Leif Edward Ottesen
    Solem, Stian
    Asarnow, Robert F.
    Einarsen, Cathrine
    Halvorsen, Joar overaas
    Paoli, Stephanie
    Saksvik, Simen Berg
    Smevik, Hanne
    Storvig, Goril
    Wells, Adrian
    Skandsen, Toril
    Olsen, Alexander
    NEUROTRAUMA REPORTS, 2024, 5 (01): : 890 - 902
  • [47] Psychological Characteristics in Acute Mild Traumatic Brain Injury: An MMPI-2 Study
    Gass, Carlton S.
    Rogers, David
    Kinne, Erica
    APPLIED NEUROPSYCHOLOGY-ADULT, 2017, 24 (02) : 108 - 115
  • [48] A Prospective Biopsychosocial Study of the Persistent Post-Concussion Symptoms following Mild Traumatic Brain Injury
    Waljas, Minna
    Iverson, Grant L.
    Lange, Rael T.
    Hakulinen, Ullamari
    Dastidar, Prasun
    Huhtala, Heini
    Liimatainen, Suvi
    Hartikainen, Kaisa
    Ohman, Juha
    JOURNAL OF NEUROTRAUMA, 2015, 32 (08) : 534 - 547
  • [49] A Systematic Review of Psychiatric, Psychological, and Behavioural Outcomes following Mild Traumatic Brain Injury in Children and Adolescents
    Emery, Carolyn A.
    Barlow, Karen M.
    Brooks, Brian L.
    Max, Jeffrey E.
    Villavicencio-Requis, Angela
    Gnanakumar, Vithya
    Robertson, Helen Lee
    Schneider, Kathryn
    Yeates, Keith Owen
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY-REVUE CANADIENNE DE PSYCHIATRIE, 2016, 61 (05): : 259 - 269
  • [50] The Role of Psychological Flexibility in Injury Rehabilitation
    DeGaetano, Jessica J.
    Wolanin, Andrew T.
    Marks, Donald R.
    Eastin, Shiloh M.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SPORT PSYCHOLOGY, 2016, 10 (03) : 192 - 205